Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
!!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year !!! Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos named LGBTQ Nation's 2016 Person of the Year

02-18-2017 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
Nice try at obfuscating the point, I am not interested in your nitpicking...
It's not a nitpick. Using a prerogative is always a fail, and always unnecessarily unresponsive, when it comes to categorization. Regardless of today's flavor of snarl words, this fact will never change. Moving right along...

Imagining that FlyWf panders to Islamists (ignorantly or not) is even more loltastically absurd than imagining he has sympathies for militant leftist groups. FYI: those two things are mutually exclusive, are you claiming FlyWf is schizo too?
02-18-2017 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
It's not a nitpick. Using a prerogative is always a fail, and always unnecessarily unresponsive, when it comes to categorization. Regardless of today's flavor of snarl words, this fact will never change. Moving right along...

Imagining that FlyWf panders to Islamists (ignorantly or not) is even more loltastically absurd than imagining he has sympathies for militant leftist groups. FYI: those two things are mutually exclusive, are you claiming FlyWf is schizo too?

Like pandering to Islamists is not the only characteristic of the regressive left. I have no idea if he does or not, but I do remember him arguing for some token of guilt on the cartoonists after the Charlie Hebdo massacre. He seemingly supports the violent riots at Milo speeches and punching Nazis, so it is not too far fetched that he supports militant leftist groups. I don't see them as mutually exclusive, in Sweden we have overlap between Islamism and the extreme left.
02-18-2017 , 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
Like pandering to Islamists is not the only characteristic of the regressive left. I have no idea if he does or not, but I do remember him arguing for some token of guilt on the cartoonists after the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
Citation ****ing needed here.

Quote:
He seemingly supports the violent riots at Milo speeches and punching Nazis, so it is not too far fetched that he supports militant leftist groups. I don't see them as mutually exclusive, in Sweden we have overlap between Islamism and the extreme left.
Uh, the extreme left is secular, you moron.
02-18-2017 , 02:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
Like pandering to Islamists is not the only characteristic of the regressive left...
The linkee you shared focus on Islamists. Once again, instead of throwing out this vague pejorative, why don't you skip the middle man, and simply explain what you're trying to get at directly. As in, FlyWf panders to Islamists, and ______, and ______. If your goal is to actually be understood, as opposed to signaling you're in with this new hipster crowd by using their new hipster terms, using a pejorative is always a fail.

Quote:
... in Sweden we have overlap between Islamism and the extreme left.
Yeah, and those overlappers are schizo. Extreme leftism is fundamentally incompatible with Sharia.
02-18-2017 , 02:04 PM
There's a helluva lot of schizos these says on both sides.
02-18-2017 , 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
There's a helluva lot of schizos these says on both sides.
Uh, the schizos were chatting about are schizo exactly because they would be claiming to be on both sides at the same exact time. So if there were 100 of these schizo peeps, there would be 100 on one side... and the same 100 on the other side.

So... all you are really saying is there are a helluva lotta schizos these days, full stop.
02-18-2017 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Citation ****ing needed here.

Uh, the extreme left is secular, you moron.
Not worth my time digging in that old thread, you were certainty arguing together with Dvaut how immoral and damaging it was to make such cartoons.

Using your style of counter argument regarding racial issues that would pretty much make you a hard core Islamist.

Last edited by Marn; 02-18-2017 at 02:15 PM.
02-18-2017 , 02:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Uh, the schizos were chatting about are schizo exactly because they would be claiming to be on both sides at the same exact time. So if there were 100 of these schizo peeps, there would be 100 on one side... and the same 100 on the other side.



So... all you are really saying is there are a helluva lotta schizos these days, full stop.

So I was being redundant, and saying the same thing twice?
02-18-2017 , 02:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
... Using your style of counter argument regarding racial issues that would pretty much make you hard core Islamist.
Can we get a cite for this too? Is it in the Quran or hadith?
02-18-2017 , 02:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shame Trolly !!!1!
Can we get a cite for this too? Is it in the Quran or hadith?
What cite? It was an analogy.

Defends racists = racist

Defends Islamists = Islamist
02-18-2017 , 02:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
Not worth my time digging in that old thread, you were certainty arguing together with Dvaut how immoral and damaging it was to make such cartoons.

Using your style of counter argument regarding racial issues that would pretty much make you a hard core Islamist.
Citation ****ing needed.
02-18-2017 , 02:30 PM
Also for whatever it's worth I proudly self-identify as Dirtbag Left.
02-18-2017 , 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Also for whatever it's worth I proudly self-identify as Dirtbag Left.
So... you played LF for Long Beach State?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marn
What cite? It was an analogy. Defends racists = racist
Defends Islamists = Islamist
Well, FlyWf doesn't defend racists, and AFAIK he doesn't defend Islamists either. So... your analogy, such as it is, doesn't apply here at all.
02-18-2017 , 02:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
It;s journalistic opinion, and you;re a lying weasel.

Retract your claim of supporting facts (which amazingly you ca';t produce), or go to moderation.
wtf is this go to moderation bull****?
02-18-2017 , 02:40 PM
By posting unsupported opinion as fact, and failing to either post any substantiation of it or retract it, you're breaking forum rules.
02-18-2017 , 02:46 PM
Ordinarily I'd think nobody would be masquerading their views, but even I wonder about some of the posters, and whether they are just pretending. Fly does half-deserve being trolled, btw.
02-18-2017 , 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
By posting unsupported opinion as fact, and failing to either post any substantiation of it or retract it, you're breaking forum rules.
If eibert can go full Maddow, then wtf National Review lol. Race to the bottom left-right plz 4 me.
02-18-2017 , 03:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Citation ****ing needed.
Why should I give a citation to a lying misrepresenting piece of human trash like yourself?
02-18-2017 , 03:04 PM
Lol @ fly being described as center left. He even said he identified as full dirtbag left, which is exactly what he is.
02-18-2017 , 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
Lol @ fly being described as center left. He even said he identified as full dirtbag left, which is exactly what he is.
Giving you the benefit of the doubt here wil, because you're known to be embarrassingly clueless about anything outside the US (as well as many things inside it), but centre left for the UK is roughly equal to far left in the US.
02-18-2017 , 03:17 PM
That's because the US has provided your security for the past century, protecting you and the rest of Euroland like our wife and kids.
02-18-2017 , 03:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
That's because the US has provided your security for the past century, protecting you and the rest of Euroland like our wife and kids.
LOL

Nice homespun analogy (surprised you didn't manage to crowbar some apple pie in there too, though), but completely inappropriate given the losses incurred by other nations, not least of all Russia, who opposed Germany way before Pearl Harbour.

At least that was an improvement on WW1.

A bit embarrassing for you that you had to reply on your worst enemy saving your wife and kids while you sat around doing SFA.

Last edited by jalfrezi; 02-18-2017 at 03:27 PM.
02-18-2017 , 03:26 PM
I'm talking about the rest of the way, guy. You've lived comfortably throughout the cold war and since and gladly taken our protection, preferring instead to put your resources into cushy social welfare programs, all while bitching about US hegemony.
02-18-2017 , 03:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
Giving you the benefit of the doubt here wil, because you're known to be embarrassingly clueless about anything outside the US (as well as many things inside it), but centre left for the UK is roughly equal to far left in the US.
Just because you guys have people more extreme than ours doesn't make my description wrong. Fly isn't considered center left in American terms by any stretch. Just because he isn't a militant anarchist doesn't make you correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FoldnDark
That's because the US has provided your security for the past century, protecting you and the rest of Euroland like our wife and kids.
To be fair, the UK have assisted in almost everything we've tried to do as far as foreign policy, even when we made mistakes. But also to be fair many countries in NATO don't pull their weight and spend what they should be spending on defense.
02-18-2017 , 03:31 PM
Yeah, I kid. Giving the center left lime a hard time.

      
m