Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
Amazing.
I can't believe that would be in their records.
Still with this Colburn calling in to double-check the license plate nonsense?
Taken in and of itself, without Strang suggesting otherwise, there is absolutely zero noteworthy in that testimony. He had been given a plate number of a missing person. He called in to double-check it. How exactly does this prove he was "looking at the plate" when he called? There is no reason to think this, none - except that Strang planted the seed.
And so now they poured through what are likely thousands of pages of documentation, found one report with the wrong date entered, and somehow now this proves that Colburn actually was looking at the car?
If nothing else this proves that the arguments that "Avery may have been guilty but not beyond a reasonable doubt", and "it's all about procedure not being properly followed" are disingenuous. It is as I've known all along - people want to believe in a massive police conspiracy to frame SA. Not only want to believe it... they do believe it. If you didn't, you would not be so excited by one typed report that shows the car seized on 11/3. It is plain that you see this as proof that the police had the car, and planted it on Avery's property. Along with all the other evidence. Which is ridiculous. You realize people sometimes make typos, right? Or just enter the wrong date?
Too boring an explanation, compared to the massive police conspiracy I suppose.