Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Making a Murderer Making a Murderer

08-12-2016 , 10:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33 Making a Murderer
no his confession wasn't coerced...
Jesus. Really? Did you even see the show? If so, I assume you're law enforcement?

That "confession" was complete horse****.
08-12-2016 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by marke. Making a Murderer
Lol.
If they had real "evidence", you know the stuff most cases are based on, "propaganda" would do absolutely nothing for him.
I'm sure that excuse goes down well in the TH Facebook groups tho (which you don't have any connection to but do have contact with ofcourse)
As I said, this isn't the first time, nor will it be the last.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Porter

And I never said what you are claiming I said. I said I was invited to pro guilty groups by friends of hers after they saw me commenting in pro innocent groups. That is where I talked to people that knew her. I have said this half a dozen times.
08-12-2016 , 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189 Making a Murderer
Jesus. Really? Did you even see loose change? If so, I assume you're law enforcement?

That "terrorist attack" was complete horse****.

...
08-13-2016 , 01:51 AM
Yep you're too smart to fall for any propaganda. Way smarter than that federal judge.

The judge's ruling offers an extremely strong rebuke of a prior court's ruling. Judges don't do things like that lightly. But yeah he was just swayed by propaganda.
08-13-2016 , 03:11 AM
Vindication?

failey and poorshillz still doing Dat Thang

Cliffs on last few months?
08-13-2016 , 03:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33 Making a Murderer
take a deep breath, calm down, and realize you watched a piece of propaganda not a documentary.

Then take a moment to remember the victim, and be grateful that at least the 2 psychos who killed her are in prison.
So many great gifs I could post here; it's an embarrassment of riches.
08-13-2016 , 03:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004 Making a Murderer
Oh wow
Quote:
Originally Posted by prana Making a Murderer
Waiting for shills, revots and Fraley to comment lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichGangi Making a Murderer
Quote:
Originally Posted by smacc25 Making a Murderer
https://www.reddit.com/r/TickTockMan...en_overturned/

Great news, SA next.

To Revots, Fraley & P,Skills Anythiing to say boys?

...

Its called Justice. Some men help the unfortunate in this world Ya Know.

squad
08-13-2016 , 08:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33 Making a Murderer
If you read my posts I said multiple times that Dassey deserved a new trial, based solely on the incompetent representation he received.

Yes he still did it, no his confession wasn't coerced, yes he should be in jail for the rest of his life.

08-13-2016 , 01:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackize5 Making a Murderer
Yep you're too smart to fall for any propaganda. Way smarter than that federal judge.

The judge's ruling offers an extremely strong rebuke of a prior court's ruling. Judges don't do things like that lightly. But yeah he was just swayed by propaganda.
So in other words, it is your contention that if this doc was never made this judge would still make this decision? Guess we will never know but I will respectfully disagree with you.
08-13-2016 , 02:22 PM
I mean ok that's an even dumber position than I thought you had taken.

We don't know how long these legal proceedings have been going on. My guess is that they started more than ~6 months ago when the doc came out.

But even if a judge never would have looked at the case were it not for the doc, the conclusion that propaganda got him released is absurd.
08-13-2016 , 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33 Making a Murderer
If you read my posts I said multiple times that Dassey deserved a new trial, based solely on the incompetent representation he received.

Yes he still did it, no his confession wasn't coerced, yes he should be in jail for the rest of his life.
lol. Did you even read the judge's decision as to why he overturned the case?

Spoiler:
Quote:
The judge found that Dassey's confession was involuntary in a 91-page decision handed down Friday
08-13-2016 , 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fraleyight Making a Murderer
So in other words, it is your contention that if this doc was never made this judge would still make this decision? Guess we will never know but I will respectfully disagree with you.
I haven't followed this thread closely at all, but this statement alone is dumb enough to cause me to discount anything you've said here.
08-13-2016 , 04:06 PM
Welcome to this thread where lawyer who trick kids to get
them convicted are hero and lawyer who try to get them out pro Bono are monsters.
Enjoy your stay
08-13-2016 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fraleyight Making a Murderer
I said I was invited to pro guilty groups by friends of hers after they saw me commenting in pro innocent groups. That is where I talked to people that knew her. I have said this half a dozen times.
So do you think perhaps your sources of info are, ehemm, biased?
08-13-2016 , 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorSkillz Making a Murderer
Bumping my thoughts from months ago that I still stand by today.

At this point, I hope Brendan takes some kind of Alford plea admitting to helping Steven cover up the crime.
It'd be a real shame if history repeats itself and he once again gets ****ed over falling on his sword for Steven.
LOL. No falling on swords, no alford pleas. Nothing like this will happen because the murder of Teresa Halbach by Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey never happened. The end.
08-13-2016 , 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by prana Making a Murderer
The judge found that Dassey's confession was involuntary in a 91-page decision handed down Friday

91 pages? maybe he was just copy-pasting from this thread
08-13-2016 , 05:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostinthesaus Making a Murderer
LOL. No falling on swords, no alford pleas. Nothing like this will happen because the murder of Teresa Halbach by Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey never happened. The end.


Welcome back Bro.

Proud of ya to post again even if its hard to ignore the noise from the guilty crew, its a pity(well not really) that they CAN'T provide ANY zilch nadda evidence that BD was involved.

WrestleManiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa 2016/2017
Here We Goooooo
[IMG] [/IMG]
08-13-2016 , 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by prana Making a Murderer
lol. Did you even read the judge's decision as to why he overturned the case?
Yep and before that an appeals court ruled the confession was voluntary. This is one opinion about how the interviews were conducted, by one particular judge. It's not proof of innocence nor is it proof the confession was coerced.

Even this judge said there was no statement by the investigators that represented a promise of leniency, which is exactly what the state court of appeals found. This judge however took the strange position that the cops "cumulatively" deceived Brendan because of his low IQ and their pattern of acting like they were on his side.
08-13-2016 , 06:23 PM
^lol

08-13-2016 , 06:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33 Making a Murderer
Yep and before that an appeals court ruled the confession was voluntary. This is one opinion about how the interviews were conducted, by one particular judge. It's not proof of innocence nor is it proof the confession was coerced.

Even this judge said there was no statement by the investigators that represented a promise of leniency, which is exactly what the state court of appeals found. This judge however took the strange position that the cops "cumulatively" deceived Brendan because of his low IQ and their pattern of acting like they were on his side.
And because obvious coercion was obvious
08-13-2016 , 06:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeotaJMU Making a Murderer
And because obvious coercion was obvious
Not that obvious, since a prior appeals court found it wasn't. And when this finally reaches the federal court in Chicago they may or may not find the same. Nice to see you guys celebrating a win for your team though, poor Brendan Dassey and his harmless teddy bear of an uncle.
08-13-2016 , 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33 Making a Murderer
Yep and before that an appeals court ruled the confession was voluntary. This is one opinion about how the interviews were conducted, by one particular judge. It's not proof of innocence nor is it proof the confession was coerced.

Even this judge said there was no statement by the investigators that represented a promise of leniency, which is exactly what the state court of appeals found. This judge however took the strange position that the cops "cumulatively" deceived Brendan because of his low IQ and their pattern of acting like they were on his side.
Clearly we just need to find another judge who doesn't watch Netflix.
08-13-2016 , 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33 Making a Murderer
Yep and before that an appeals court ruled the confession was voluntary. This is one opinion about how the interviews were conducted, by one particular judge..
Was it judge Willis who tried BD who was also this appeals judge you speak of?

YA NO WONDER HE DID NOT RULE AGAINST HIMSELF.

#Ticktock
08-13-2016 , 08:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by smacc25 Making a Murderer
^lol

Are you a fan or is this a random grab?

      
m