Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDean1
i don't think being a good wolf should price into somebody's villager game at all. they both should be evaluated in a vaccuum since skills pay the bills and you shouldn't get extra credit for being a lol wolf
also i think in spite of his wolf rep WN is often a super villagery villager that is easy to clear. good wolves can be obvious villagers too
thanks sexdoll. i don't actually have mets on ignore, but would prefer that people who were inclined to interact with him did. i don't want the thread to devolve into stupid arguments with him and whoever he baits into engaging.
I'm more talking about consensus when saying how wolf games factor into village games. It also depends on what you value. If a big part of being a good villager is never being mislynched then having a rep as a bad wolf is pretty useful. WN was the rare case where he was pretty much impossible to lynch in either role for quite some time.
Personally I don't find being unmislynchable to be a super super valuable trait in a villager compared to being able to make good reads/wagon the correct people, but in terms of consensus-forming it obviously is.
And yeah, I agree on good wolves being able to be obvious villagers, and I think WN can be a super obvious villager. I just also think he's the exception (although most good players will be exceptions, obv).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix the Cat
I thought well named thought well named wasn't a very good wolf?
This is coming from a vague recollection of a comment of his that was in-game so it is probably inaccurate. Pretty sure he was a villager that game. He may have also been a wolf; I'm fairly sure he wasn't a serial killer. It may have been a vanilla game. In fact I'm pretty sure it was a vanilla game and thus serial killer was outside his range at that point during the game. Not sure though.
WN is kinda adorably self-deprecating <3 But yeah I think he considers himself a meh wolf but his track record is very good.