Quote:
Originally Posted by mmbt0ne
On the regular? They're 4-2-7 (-5 GD) against those teams in the last decade.
So yeah, they beat one of them every 2.5 years.
USA's beaten Spain in 2009, Italy in 2012 and Germay in 2013, so that's every a win every 1.4 years for us. Sounds like we're ~70% better.
one of them? did you actually look at their results? in the past 1 and a half year they played spain, italy 2x, brazil 2x, france, belgium and the netherlands, of those games they only lost vs. Netherlands, they beat italy, brazil, spain and belgium and drew with france (along with additional draws vs brazil and italy). This is in the past 18 months or so.
looking at the past decade in international football when trying to analyse current state of affairs is short-sighted at best
implying that the USA should be anything else than a size-able underdog vs. England makes you one (or all) of: a troll, blinded by homerism or just seriously lacking in knowledge of the game
i watched a handful of USA games in qualifying and they legit struggled in the ones i watched which is just lol when taking into regard the seemingly high estimation you have of them and the relative ability of the teams in CONCACAF. I mean you don't even need to look further than their team-sheet, it just doesn't match up at all.
England gets perpetually underestimated by most (at least judging by posters on this forum) which maybe isn't strange given the expectations that come when it's league is the pinnacle of interest in the footballing world and they "invented" association football. But their results are rarely poor, they have lost only 2 of their last 24 matches and they've lost i think 5 or less times since 2010. Sure the current squad doesn't look as good on paper as it has in recent past, couple of formerly key players aging etc., but the US team sure as **** doesn't match up.
I'm not a USA hater, i have a US passport and always root for you guys but i am, however, a hater of sick delusion.