Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1

10-18-2013 , 02:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theshocker7
To be honest I have no idea on USA midfielders but carrick and wilshere are top class midfielders, they would start or at least be a rotation option for all 20 prem teams, Gerrard and Lampard have still got decent parts to their game.

You're in the wrong forum to dis Bradley like that. You're welcome to say what you want about most players on our side but Bradley is at least as top class as Carrick or Wilshire. He has had very little club stability. But he put De Rossi's ass on the bench once and if he's healthy I have little doubt he'll do it again.



Attacking wise there is no way you can compare altidore, Dempsey and Donovan to anything England can field.

Rooney would be our best option clearly. Other than that...

Altidore tanked one season in England already and is hardly pulling up trees now at Sunderland although to be fair it isn't going to be easy to impress there.

He also scored 39 in 67 for AZ. He's neither as good or as bad as his numbers have made him appear. Scoring in 6 straight matches he started for the nats isn't a bad number either. Especially when every team you play hates you to the utmost.



Dempsey was a solid prem player but his highest achievement was being a rotation option for spurs,






Donovan looked ok for Everton.

http://espn.go.com/sports/soccer/sto...n-player-month

I watched all those matches. Other than Baines, who was close and I'd be willing to listen to an argument for, Landon was their most important player on the pitch during his last loan.
.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 02:37 AM
Isn't the main factor of our draw being bad the fact that we are in that pod in the first place (i.e going to be against a pod 1 team and a solid UEFA team) and the fact that we are the best in the pod doesn't matter as much

Last edited by Biesterfield; 10-18-2013 at 02:43 AM.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 02:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loosekanen
I did a massive analysis of this about a month ago and yeah, I knew that **** was coming. We are highly likely to be in the toughest group unless we draw the Swiss. Just because we're at another level from everybody else in our pod. And after Japan's performance in CONFED Cup I'm confident ranking us ahead of them though they do always bring the WIM to WC.
Mexico has a higher chance at being in group of death because nations actually respect us and they laugh at your national team. when people see Mexico as the 3rd best team of the group, that automatically wins the title of group of death. that won't happen if they see USA instead.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:00 AM
Few things anger me more than people talking **** about Jozy and his first PL season. He was NINETEEN ****ING YEARS OLD AND PLAYING FOR HULL CITY.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruizn63
Mexico has a higher chance at being in group of death because nations actually respect us and they laugh at your national team. when people see Mexico as the 3rd best team of the group, that automatically wins the title of group of death. that won't happen if they see USA instead.
trolololOLOLCRUZINNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:07 AM
@Loosekanen - No way you can put Michael Bradley anywhere near Wilshere or Carrick.
Jozy scored 39 in 67 in a terrible league? Most championship level strikers could probably match that, or at least come close...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobboFitos
actually, our front 6 is probably stronger than lolengland.
Lmao.

I can't believe how deluded some Americans are about their soccer team... They're way behind England and you'd be an idiot to say they aren't. You can just look at the leagues the majority of your national team plays in and already decide that they don't even come close, never mind the fact that you lost to Costa Rica and Honduras this year.
Michael Bradley would be the best player on ~10 EPL teams? Haha, he wouldn't even be the best player on ~10 Championship teams.


Quote:
Originally Posted by BobboFitos
This is rubbish. Yeah, Rooney would be our best player. England has played 6 competitive matches this year, so this is their team based on #caps...

GK - Joe Hart. Hart wouldn't make our team.

Hart is better than Brad Guzan, do you really think title challengers like Man City would just keep using him because they can't be bothered to buy a new keeper? I'd also take Fraser Forster, John Ruddy and maybe Jack Butland over Brad Guzan

D - Walker/Baines/Jagielka/Cahill [Cole] Baines is pretty great. Kyle Walker would be an upgrade for us, but that's more because we are very weak there; I don't think he's anything to be proud about internationally. Ashley Cole is older and losing it a bit, but I do like Jagielka a lot. Really England's back 4 would all pretty clearly be our back line, but none of those guys would be our best player. Baines would be in the MB90/Demps/Landon tier, maybe. Jagielka in the 2nd tier.

Baines is one of the, if not the best LB in the world, Kyle Walker isn't our best RB imo (Glen Johnson is) and he's much better than anyone the US has, Ashley Cole is still one of the best defensively at LB, although not as good attacking wise anymore - but again still far better. LOL at that tier of Dempsey and Landon (average mid-table EPL players), Baines (world class) is way above those and even Jagielka is a bit above those.

M - Gerrard, Lampard [Carrick] lol? I like Stevie G a LOT, and Carrick has a million fan boys on 2p2. Could probably pair any of those guys with MB90, since I doubt Jones or Cameron beat them on a spot. But our pairing isn't really that far off for them.

LOL at pairing one of those with MB, he wouldn't even see the bench - Wilshere, Carrick, Lampard, Gerrard, Ravel Morrison, Barkley, Rodwell, cleverly and Shelvey are all definitely better than him. Leon Osman is probably also better.

W - Welbeck, Walcott, Townsend Townsend is pretty legit, but Welbeck legit sucks. Theo is a wildcard.

I'm not a fan of Welbeck but he would still start every game for your national team. Walcott is valued at over £20 million, the entire US national team squad is valued at ~£30 million and your calling him a wildcard? His decision making is often a bit poor and he's not very intelligent football wise but he still has immense ability and, again, would easily start every game for the US. We also have Lennon, Adam Johnson, Zaha, Young (who sucks), Sterling, Milner and Oxlade-Chamberlain who are better than anyone you have.

S - Rooney, Sturridge Give me Jozy over Sturridge. Yeah, Rooney would be our best player, but he's the only slam dunk.

Haha at Jozy over Sturridge, Jozy is a mid-table/bottom half of the table EPL player, Sturridge is one of the best strikers in England and if he can continue to be consistent will become one of the best in Europe.
Defoe is better than Jozy, as is Lambert.

The fact that you lost to Honduras and Costa Rica this year should be enough to make you wake up and yet you try to say the US national team is better than England?
This might be a good time to mention that England haven't lost a competitive match in 3 years iirc (at Euro 2012 they went out on penalties) and played Brazil in two friendlies this year; beat them at home and drew away.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wAzZu24
trolololOLOLCRUZINNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
tell me which would be seen as the group of death:

Argentina
USA
Russia
Netherlands

or

Argentina
Mexico
Russia
Netherlands


ill tell you right that im 100% sure that those 3 countries would much rather play USA over Mexico and that the majority of the world would see the 2nd group as the group of death and not the first one.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:14 AM
Those groups aren't even possible, so neither one.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:18 AM
how are they not possible? i got them from that simulator site.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:25 AM
didn't realize russia was being tossed into group 3 since there isn't enough uefa teams being seeded

to answer the question, the 1st one would be the group of death

where's the debate? i mean even if teams from other places have the perception that the mexico is better, that doesn't make the 1st group not the group of death

usa is better than mexico, there is no debate on that
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Microdegen
This might be a good time to mention that England haven't lost a competitive match in 3 years iirc (at Euro 2012 they went out on penalties) and played Brazil in two friendlies this year; beat them at home and drew away.
In 2013, USA played 16 competitive matches. (Non-friendlies) We went 13-2-1.

That is far more impressive than England's "unbeaten" streak, as they played 6 competitive matches going 4-0-2. Congratulations on beating up San Marino and Moldova to continue that unbeaten streak, folks. San Marino wouldn't even give Belize a game!

England looked good the previous 2 matches to nail down their group; they have looked very unimpressive the entire year. I'd say USA USA USA has momentum, given we're the Kings of CONCACAF. England? Grats on barely rubbing off Ukraine for your group.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wAzZu24
didn't realize russia was being tossed into group 3 since there isn't enough uefa teams being seeded

to answer the question, the 1st one would be the group of death

where's the debate? i mean even if teams from other places have the perception that the mexico is better, that doesn't make the 1st group not the group of death

usa is better than mexico, there is no debate on that
the world determines the group of death. if they think Mexico's group would be the group of death, its because everyone knows that Mexico is better. and you arent better. just like the english dudes showed you by comparing player-by-player, we can do the same for Mexico and you would be lucky to get 3 spots.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:45 AM
rofl if you think only 3 americans make mexicos roster

you are trolling even harder than usual right now, quick turnaround for a guy rooting for a team that was gifted life in WCQ and still might lose

perception != reality

Also I'm not so sure that people from other countries are actually as dumb as you think they are. Mexico is a complete mess, I'd rather draw them than Japan.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:47 AM
God I'm so glad I'm not an English soccer fan. You guys are insufferable. Who knew BAIDS was actually top tier?
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wAzZu24
rofl if you think only 3 americans make mexicos roster

you are trolling even harder than usual right now, quick turnaround for a guy rooting for a team that was gifted life in WCQ and still might lose

perception != reality

Also I'm not so sure that people from other countries are actually as dumb as you think they are. Mexico is a complete mess, I'd rather draw them than Japan.
Ditto rather draw them than South Korea.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruizn63
the world determines the group of death. if they think Mexico's group would be the group of death, its because everyone knows that Mexico is better. and you arent better. just like the english dudes showed you by comparing player-by-player, we can do the same for Mexico and you would be lucky to get 3 spots.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:53 AM
http://www.oddschecker.com/football/world-cup/matches

In the event you guys dont also read the WC thread, odds up for NZ/Mehico. I'm amazed at how the books are treating Mexico. My advice...

Load up on the Kiwis!
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:54 AM
I will give Cruizn credit that the group with Mexico in it would be the group of death. If you are in a group with Mexico that means you didn't make the tournament.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:56 AM
6-1 freeeee money for El Tie.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:58 AM
NZ is really 14/1 at home to win?
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 03:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by loosekanen
6-1 freeeee money for El Tie.
ya this is what i think. NZ are actually a tough out - they were undefeated in last WC! - and i have to imagine they'll be parking the bus like no other. we all know how mexicans do with buses in a parking lot.

azteca just isn't a fortress. gonna make for a scintillating game regardless, but 0-0 is totally in the cards.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 04:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by charder30
NZ is really 14/1 at home to win?
game is in mexico (leg 1). i dont like betting NZ to win tho

Last edited by BobboFitos; 10-18-2013 at 04:09 AM.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 04:02 AM
oh yeah leg 1 is in Mexico, makes more sense.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 04:10 AM
cant wait for mexico to lose to a team that just tied a 4th division american club team

link isnt working but:
Quote:
VENTURA, CA – Honours were shared as the All Whites drew a training match 1-1 with US club Ventura County Fusion in California today.

Quote:
Ventura County Fusion is an American soccer team based in Ventura, California, United States. Founded in 2006, the team plays in the USL Premier Development League (PDL), the fourth tier of the American Soccer Pyramid
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote
10-18-2013 , 04:13 AM
i would love to see you guys burn money on betting against Mexico, but because you guys saved us from missing the world cup, i'm going to do you a solid and tell you NOT to bet against Mexico.

reasons:
1) new legit manager tomorrow. he is expected to have the majority of his soon-to-be ex club players on the team and that will fix our problem of looking like a clueless team out there.
2) no chicharo. suspended for first match. he cant **** anything up this time.
3) 2pm game. c'mon now. just remember all those times donovan's bitch ass ran out of breath at the end of games. those kiwis will be dead by halftime.
4) im tried and want to finish this post so this is enough.


don't bet on a draw, its not happening. i dont care if kiwi's park their entire bench, Mexico will find a way to score a few goals and win this match comfortably.
US Men's National Soccer Team Thread: USA #1 Quote

      
m