@Loosekanen - No way you can put Michael Bradley anywhere near Wilshere or Carrick.
Jozy scored 39 in 67 in a terrible league? Most championship level strikers could probably match that, or at least come close...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobboFitos
actually, our front 6 is probably stronger than lolengland.
Lmao.
I can't believe how deluded some Americans are about their soccer team... They're way behind England and you'd be an idiot to say they aren't. You can just look at the leagues the majority of your national team plays in and already decide that they don't even come close, never mind the fact that you lost to Costa Rica and Honduras this year.
Michael Bradley would be the best player on ~10 EPL teams? Haha, he wouldn't even be the best player on ~10 Championship teams.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobboFitos
This is rubbish. Yeah, Rooney would be our best player. England has played 6 competitive matches this year, so this is their team based on #caps...
GK - Joe Hart. Hart wouldn't make our team.
Hart is better than Brad Guzan, do you really think title challengers like Man City would just keep using him because they can't be bothered to buy a new keeper? I'd also take Fraser Forster, John Ruddy and maybe Jack Butland over Brad Guzan
D - Walker/Baines/Jagielka/Cahill [Cole] Baines is pretty great. Kyle Walker would be an upgrade for us, but that's more because we are very weak there; I don't think he's anything to be proud about internationally. Ashley Cole is older and losing it a bit, but I do like Jagielka a lot. Really England's back 4 would all pretty clearly be our back line, but none of those guys would be our best player. Baines would be in the MB90/Demps/Landon tier, maybe. Jagielka in the 2nd tier.
Baines is one of the, if not the best LB in the world, Kyle Walker isn't our best RB imo (Glen Johnson is) and he's much better than anyone the US has, Ashley Cole is still one of the best defensively at LB, although not as good attacking wise anymore - but again still far better. LOL at that tier of Dempsey and Landon (average mid-table EPL players), Baines (world class) is way above those and even Jagielka is a bit above those.
M - Gerrard, Lampard [Carrick] lol? I like Stevie G a LOT, and Carrick has a million fan boys on 2p2. Could probably pair any of those guys with MB90, since I doubt Jones or Cameron beat them on a spot. But our pairing isn't really that far off for them.
LOL at pairing one of those with MB, he wouldn't even see the bench - Wilshere, Carrick, Lampard, Gerrard, Ravel Morrison, Barkley, Rodwell, cleverly and Shelvey are all definitely better than him. Leon Osman is probably also better.
W - Welbeck, Walcott, Townsend Townsend is pretty legit, but Welbeck legit sucks. Theo is a wildcard.
I'm not a fan of Welbeck but he would still start every game for your national team. Walcott is valued at over £20 million, the entire US national team squad is valued at ~£30 million and your calling him a wildcard? His decision making is often a bit poor and he's not very intelligent football wise but he still has immense ability and, again, would easily start every game for the US. We also have Lennon, Adam Johnson, Zaha, Young (who sucks), Sterling, Milner and Oxlade-Chamberlain who are better than anyone you have.
S - Rooney, Sturridge Give me Jozy over Sturridge. Yeah, Rooney would be our best player, but he's the only slam dunk.
Haha at Jozy over Sturridge, Jozy is a mid-table/bottom half of the table EPL player, Sturridge is one of the best strikers in England and if he can continue to be consistent will become one of the best in Europe.
Defoe is better than Jozy, as is Lambert.
The fact that you lost to Honduras and Costa Rica this year should be enough to make you wake up and yet you try to say the US national team is better than England?
This might be a good time to mention that England haven't lost a competitive match in 3 years iirc (at Euro 2012 they went out on penalties) and played Brazil in two friendlies this year; beat them at home and drew away.