Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Here we go again... (unarmed black teen shot by cop): Shootings in LA and MN Here we go again... (unarmed black teen shot by cop): Shootings in LA and MN

09-24-2016 , 06:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
The fail is that it is BS.

The truth is cops are way way way way quicker to draw their guns and tell people to put their hands up in the first place, and obviously way way way way more likely to do it to black people.

Cops and them getting caught on video is what has changed.
They have interactions with alcoholics, drug abusers, psychiatrically ill, criminals, etc on a regular basis. Being mindful of your safety and asking someone to put their hands up seems like a sensible request.
09-24-2016 , 06:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrChesspain
I know, I mean, if black people just knew how to step and fetch better in the face of harassment they just might get to live another day.
Exactly.Quit acting a fool.

Ain't always fair or right but living to get pissed over it ....priceless.
09-24-2016 , 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevenPoke
I'm honestly not seeing "So much fail" in this.
There's plenty of fail. There's victim blaming for one. There's the insinuation that if the cops tell you not to video tape them, you need to listen. There's the gross generalization that society is "uncivilized and vulgar." Just a lot of pearl clutching in general. And that was just the first paragraph. LOL.
09-24-2016 , 06:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kohut
They have interactions with alcoholics, drug abusers, psychiatrically ill, criminals, etc on a regular basis. Being mindful of your safety and asking someone to put their hands up seems like a sensible request.
You know what's a sensible request? Not being shot and killed from the police when you are not committing a crime.
09-24-2016 , 07:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
The Charlet PD deleted a bunch of tweets. These guys are stupid.
But they can at least spell Charlotte.
09-24-2016 , 07:37 PM
The body cam video cleared nothing up. Have not seem the dash cam yet.
09-24-2016 , 07:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by campfirewest
But they can at least spell Charlotte.
It's Charlet. Get it right. I lived there so I know. Duh.
09-24-2016 , 08:01 PM
Have no idea why they sat on those videos.
09-24-2016 , 08:05 PM
Because even if he has a gun in his hand he is backing up and never raises it would be my guess.
09-24-2016 , 08:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kohut
They have interactions with alcoholics, drug abusers, psychiatrically ill, criminals, etc on a regular basis. Being mindful of your safety and asking someone to put their hands up seems like a sensible request.
It also seems sensible to request that the cops not summarily execute these people when they're slow to put their hands up.
09-24-2016 , 08:10 PM
politics forum, nice knowing you lol
09-24-2016 , 08:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
The body cam video cleared nothing up. Have not seem the dash cam yet.
It sort of clears up for me the fact that the objects on the ground in the wife's video were all gloves. That and the guy's right ankle appears to have a blurry something that looks kind of like the holster they admitted into evidence on it.
09-24-2016 , 08:46 PM
Dash cam looked to me like he had something in his hand when he was getting out of the car (or being strangely arm-out limp-wristed), that what the guy in red was passing to the black cop was very likely gloves and not a gun/the gun on the ground... and that he got shot with his arms down not pointing or moving to point.
09-24-2016 , 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chips Ahoy
They might? have a problem without the weed claims.

http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions...d/115084.P.pdf



That was a case where Charlotte police detained on the basis of open carrying and the court tossed it. If they don't have the right to question somebody for open carrying, how can they order him out of his car? The initial reports didn't list a crime, just a gun.
Yea I was thinking that. Without the weed sighting they'd be in some trouble.
09-24-2016 , 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Yea I was thinking that. Without the weed sighting they'd be in some trouble.
Smoking some weed is like a class c misdemeanor, like stealing ice cream from a store, not punishable by public execution as far as I'm aware.
09-24-2016 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
Smoking some weed is like a class c misdemeanor, like stealing ice cream from a store, not punishable by public execution as far as I'm aware.
Of course not, but the opportune sighting of weed and a gun is a good way to explain, after the fact, why they were bothering the guy when they were supposed to be doing something else. A gun alone wouldn't be enough and weed alone would be a weak reason but weed + gun = menace to society. Maybe that's how it went down, maybe it's a nice CYA, who knows?
09-24-2016 , 11:57 PM
100% CYA. Yeah cops are some sketchy ****s imo.
09-25-2016 , 01:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Used2Play
It's obvious the advice is not for dead people. Why would you think it so? But if you are in your teens/20's (like a lot of people on this forum) it is good advice. Forget the things you can't control, think of self-preservation first.

This guy made a huge mistake. It doesn't justify police overreaction/killing him but he could have gone home to his family if he would have listened to the person pointing a gun at him. You are a fool if you think (especially after watching all these videos) that the police "wouldn't dare do this or that", "I'm not being threatening", "police should act this way".

My advice is very simple and very true, you can't control the actions of the police (or robber) but you can control yours. If someone points a gun at you, do what they say.
Taxpayers pay for police, not robbers. We hold police to higher standards as we hope they hold themselves.

Small crimes shouldn't lead to deaths.

What is interesting about both of these cases is that officers involved were on completely different cases than the ones they shot their suspects.

Tulsa Sheriff was on her way to a domestic violence call and the Charlotte officer was on his was to make an arrest for a warrant. And somehow a person with car problem and a guy smoking a joint are both dead. It wasn't like they saw a bank robbery in progress. It does appear from the videos that each situation escalated extremely quickly (seconds). It is the officer that should much better trained and equipped on de-escalating any situation. For everyone's sake.
09-25-2016 , 02:07 AM
the problem is that people who share your sentiment don't want to be police officers. the ones who want to be police officers are ex-military, love to hunt, love to go to the firing range, pick up driving frat boy types. thus we end up with the kind of police force that we have today.
09-25-2016 , 02:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
the problem is that people who share your sentiment don't want to be police officers. the ones who want to be police officers are ex-military, love to hunt, love to go to the firing range, pick up driving frat boy types. thus we end up with the kind of police force that we have today.
Then we have to change the type of people. A person who was trained to shoot someone in a cave in Afghanistan is probably not the right person to be called out to a domestic violence call. The officer in Tulsa had TWO domestic violence/restraining orders against HER personally. Everything about the military is so different. The military attacks in waves with thousands of people with a huge arsenal. In the US, we are sending them out in waves of 2 or 4 people and only giving them a gun. And not much less or more. Sheriffs in the Wild West had a rope to use from a distance. I am sure someone who served in the military is freaked out by all of this and is prone to use their weapon.
09-25-2016 , 07:55 AM
a big reason marijuana is still mostly illegal today is because police (and GOP voters) want that excuse for escalating with civilians (disproportionately non-white) that are otherwise not breaking the law. with NC being an open carry state, if marijuana were also legal, Keith Lamont Scott would still be alive
09-25-2016 , 09:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by conlaw
I, like Steve Harvey's children, was taught to submit and comply and treat police with complete deference. Not to say I must accept their point of view, but when in an encounter, I have always submitted and been respectful. I can say the police have not always treated me with respect. I am white and without a felony record yet I have been assaulted and unfairly stopped by police on several occasions. But I was never shot. And I don't complain about how I must behave when confronted by police.
"If you submit and are respectful you might get assaulted by police but not shot" is not a great argument to make.
09-25-2016 , 10:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
the problem is that people who share your sentiment don't want to be police officers. the ones who want to be police officers are ex-military, love to hunt, love to go to the firing range, pick up driving frat boy types. thus we end up with the kind of police force that we have today.
Your insightful soul-read seems spot on, I'm sure you are just running cold lately
09-25-2016 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis Cyphre
"If you submit and are respectful you might get assaulted by police but not shot" is not a great argument to make.
Those are the facts. Police are the lawful authority. Whether they have probable cause to arrest and/or behave appropriately, under the law we must comply. The only time we can resist arrest and defend ourselves is if the arrest is illegal (objectively) and we have a reasonable fear for our lives.(objective standard)

In all of these police shooting in the media, the arrestees have disobeyed the police commands ad the arrests were lawful. In my opinion, this entire debate is absurd.

If I was black, I would be arguing for better policing in my community so the astronomical black on black crime rate is reduced.

At the same time I would be arguing for reform of the criminal justice system especially in terms of sentencing and drug crimes.

The issue of "implicit bias" which the black lives matter movement admits black officers possess, cannot be legislated away because it is unconscious.

I do not see how we can argue that government should be in the business of making laws with the threat of force behind them which seek to regulate the subconscious minds of citizens.
09-25-2016 , 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Louis Cyphre
"If you submit and are respectful you might get assaulted by police but not shot" is not a great argument to make.
What is wrong with dispensing accurate common sense advice to avoid being killed?

You would prefer everyone was confrontational and non compliant with police officers so they maximize their chance of getting killed in every encounter with a police officer?

      
m