"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! - Page 196 - Other Topics Forum - Discuss Pop Culture, Arts and Entertainment

Two Plus Two Forums 2+2 Communities Other Other Topics

"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode!

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 196 of 247

First

96 146 176 186 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 206 216 246

Last

Page 196 of 247

First

96 146 176 186 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 206 216 246

Last

03-06-2014 , 02:30 PM

#4876

KPowers

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 13,431

"Why doesn't aol.com track hits anymore?"

I feel this is not how this should be written, but I don't really know what's better.

Oh, and tell your grandparents not to worry, aol.com is still tracking hits.

EDIT:

How does "Why is aol.com no longer tracking hits?" sound?

Quote

03-06-2014 , 04:20 PM

#4877

PokerDharma

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 2,212

I like semicolons; they're useful for adjoining complete thoughts.

Quote

03-06-2014 , 05:21 PM

#4878

Didace

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 20,452

Quote:

Originally Posted by KPowers

"Why doesn't aol.com track hits anymore?"

I feel this is not how this should be written, but I don't really know what's better.

Why do you feel that way? It looks fine to me.

Quote

03-06-2014 , 06:10 PM

#4879

PokerDharma

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 2,212

Why for come AOL no track hits?

Quote

03-06-2014 , 06:17 PM

#4880

NewOldGuy

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,935

Quote:

Originally Posted by PokerDharma

Why for come AOL no track hits?

No, you forgot the mandatory double negative.

"Why AOL don't track no hits?"

But to translate the original properly into standard bad grammar you need this:

"Why AOL don't track no hits no more?"

Quote

03-09-2014 , 07:12 PM

#4881

metsandfinsfan

banned

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 160,445

Quote

03-09-2014 , 11:49 PM

#4882

mindraider

adept

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 723

Always "If I were you..." or "If I were a rockstar...", and never was, right?

Quote

03-10-2014 , 12:13 AM

#4883

ChrisV

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 40,336

Quote:

Originally Posted by mindraider

Always "If I were you..." or "If I were a rockstar...", and never was, right?

"Were" is correct but either are considered acceptable. "Was" is slightly more colloquial, fine in conversation but sloppy in written language.

Quote

03-10-2014 , 12:28 AM

#4884

NewOldGuy

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,935

Last edited by NewOldGuy; 03-10-2014 at 12:34 AM.

Quote

03-10-2014 , 11:34 AM

#4885

RussellinToronto

veteran

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 2,243

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisV

"Were" is correct but either are considered acceptable. "Was" is slightly more colloquial, fine in conversation but sloppy in written language.

The subjunctive "were" is a way of indicating impossible or implausible statements. "If I were you" sounds much better to me in conversation as well as in writing.

Even in the song, it's "If I were a carpenter ..." Though when Johnny Cash sings it, it's not hard to imagine that he could become one.

Quote

03-10-2014 , 05:08 PM

#4886

metsandfinsfan

banned

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 160,445

Werr is the conditional tense

Quote

03-10-2014 , 06:52 PM

#4887

W0X0F

sit back, relax, and enjoy the flight

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 5,853

Quote:

Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan

Werr is the conditional tense

In what language?

Quote

03-10-2014 , 08:49 PM

#4888

steve1238

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 7,631

Quote:

Originally Posted by mindraider

Always "If I were you..." or "If I were a rockstar...", and never was, right?

http://youtu.be/v9YOptg8D-U#t=00m26s

Quote

03-10-2014 , 09:58 PM

#4889

JaredL

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 22,523

Had a Facebook friend share this and did a double take. Anybody else think the headline implies something rather different about the song than the author intended?

Quote:

Ryan Dolan releases anti-gay bullying song ‘Start Again’

Ryan Dolan has released a new single with an anti-gay bullying message.

Dolan, who represented Ireland at last year’s Eurovision Song Contest, came out as gay last month (February).

ETA: Thinking about it, there is are two possible interpretations, neither of which are what the author intended.

Quote

03-10-2014 , 10:05 PM

#4890

NewOldGuy

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,935

I think a second hyphen after "gay" fixes it and would have the intended meaning.

Quote

03-10-2014 , 11:22 PM

#4891

steve1238

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 7,631

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewOldGuy

I think a comma after "gay" fixes it and would have the intended meaning.

Fyp

Quote

03-10-2014 , 11:38 PM

#4892

NewOldGuy

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,935

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve1238

Fyp

Yeah, now it has the opposite meaning. Punctuation is everything.

Quote

03-11-2014 , 09:43 AM

#4893

GMan42

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 5,329

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewOldGuy

I think a second hyphen after "gay" fixes it and would have the intended meaning.

Pretty much, but again this is one that benefits most from just rephrasing it. Like "Ryan Dolan releases 'Start Again', a song speaking out against gay bullying" or whatever.

Quote

03-11-2014 , 10:57 AM

#4894

joejoe1337

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 16,347

My phone is being annoying and won't let me upload but my girlfriend got me a pack of the candy love hearts and one said 'its love'. Rage.

Quote

03-11-2014 , 12:36 PM

#4895

steve1238

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 7,631

Quote

03-11-2014 , 03:41 PM

#4896

Shrike

adept

Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,163

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisV

"Were" is correct but either are considered acceptable. "Was" is slightly more colloquial, fine in conversation but sloppy in written language.

There is a difference between being common (as, for example, misuse of the conditional in oral English) and being acceptable.

Quote

03-11-2014 , 03:44 PM

#4897

Shrike

adept

Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 1,163

And btw:

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisV

"Were" is correct but either are is considered acceptable.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaredL

ETA: Thinking about it, there is are two possible interpretations, neither of which are is what the author intended.

Quote

03-15-2014 , 10:47 PM

#4898

Hector Cerif

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 1,556

So I've been seeing parenthesis sentence structure I'm not used to lately and I'm wondering what's best.

Blah blah blah (blah).

or,

Blah blah blah. (blah.)

Quote

03-15-2014 , 10:52 PM

#4899

Hector Cerif

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 1,556

Bonus round:

I was just corrected for saying "on accident." (It's "by accident" ldo.)

But then why doesn't that hold true for "on purpose?" You don't normally hear "by purpose" (unless there's some grammatical rule here I'm not getting).

Quote

03-16-2014 , 09:44 AM

#4900

baumer

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 4,061

I think it has something to do with the intention.

You act on purpose. The act and intention is due to some purpose, the actor receives credit for acting on a purpose.

You screw up by accident. The mechanism that determines the outcome was not the intended/planned for, so it is attributed to some outside force using "by".

Quote

Page 196 of 247

First

96 146 176 186 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 206 216 246

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 196 of 247

First

96 146 176 186 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 206 216 246

Last