Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! "Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode!

04-01-2013 , 03:04 PM
Now I feel bad English isn't his first language.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-01-2013 , 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJW
Just came across this on the first page.

"mom turns 52, sports a lot, has her own communication office and very social"

I'm normally pretty uninterested in grammar and punctuation but the use of "Sports" as a verb just really annoys me the poster also managed to use emphatic when he meant empathic but that's forgivable.
"Sports" can definitely be used a verb, but needs an object. Here's a possible rewrite for you:

"mom turns 52, sports a lot of cleavage, has her own communication office and very social"
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-01-2013 , 08:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by W0X0F
"Sports" can definitely be used a verb, but needs an object. Here's a possible rewrite for you:

"mom turns 52, sports a lot of cleavage, has her own communication office and very social"
From a grammar standpoint it only needs an object if you use it with the meaning in your example. But the verb "sports" can certainly be defined in an intransitive sense. Use your imagination. Grammar doesn't care about word definitions, only that you construct the sentence properly to convey the intended meaning.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-01-2013 , 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewOldGuy
From a grammar standpoint it only needs an object if you use it with the meaning in your example. But the verb "sports" can certainly be defined in an intransitive sense. Use your imagination. Grammar doesn't care about word definitions, only that you construct the sentence properly to convey the intended meaning.
I couldn't think of an example where "sports" would be intransitive. Since you have a better imagination, would you mind sharing?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-01-2013 , 08:59 PM
Very tilting billboard.

"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-01-2013 , 10:24 PM
What is that billboard even advertising?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-01-2013 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rei Ayanami
What is that billboard even advertising?
It's just an empty billboard advertising for an ad there.

Not so easy to take a good picture while driving 80 MPH.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-02-2013 , 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rei Ayanami
What is that billboard even advertising?
"If U have 2 ask," U can't a4d it.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-02-2013 , 08:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by W0X0F
I couldn't think of an example where "sports" would be intransitive. Since you have a better imagination, would you mind sharing?
I'm sure you're familiar with the colloquial use of "represents" as an intransitive verb, as in, "he's representing", or the street slang form, "he be representin'."

Similarly, she can be sportin'.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-02-2013 , 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewOldGuy
I'm sure you're familiar with the colloquial use of "represents" as an intransitive verb, as in, "he's representing", or the street slang form, "he be representin'."

Similarly, she can be sportin'.


I'll accept that, but it comes under the heading of slang or colloquial speech. I don't think anyone would call it "proper grammar."
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-03-2013 , 09:46 AM
Neck in neck.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-03-2013 , 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ObezyankaNol
Neck in neck.
Tongue and cheek?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-03-2013 , 01:25 PM
When writing in English, should the spelling be "Carnaval" or "Carnival" when referring to festivals in countries which spell the event "Carnaval"?

I always spell it "Carnaval", but I find that I may be in the minority. (For what it's worth, I also use the Spanish pronunciation when speaking about it in English.)
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-03-2013 , 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by soah
When writing in English, should the spelling be "Carnaval" or "Carnival" when referring to festivals in countries which spell the event "Carnaval"?

I always spell it "Carnaval", but I find that I may be in the minority. (For what it's worth, I also use the Spanish pronunciation when speaking about it in English.)
In American usage these should really be two different words, but they are often spelled interchangeably.

Carnaval is another word for Mardi Gras, or any pre-Lent celebration (not necessarily on "fat tuesday").

In American usage, "carnival" is a traveling circus/fair/rides.

Edit:
Word origin of the first is Italian "carnevale" meaning no meat, leave out the meat (for Lent).

Last edited by NewOldGuy; 04-03-2013 at 03:47 PM.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 01:56 AM
I just read milleniums on the website of... wait for it... the New York ****ing Times.

the illiterate mother****ers surrounding us have won.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 02:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by five4suited
I just read milleniums on the website of... wait for it... the New York ****ing Times.

the illiterate mother****ers surrounding us have won.
An acceptable plural according to Merriam-Webster. We speak English; why should we use Latin plural forms?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 08:18 AM
This is a snippet from another thread (about Roger Ebert's death):

Quote:
The anniversary of Siskel's death was a few months ago, and Roger posted this collection of outtakes of he and Gene sniping at each other.
I see this so often that I'm beginning to think I've been wrong all this time. I've always believed it should be "him" following any preposition, but this particular usage is rampant on radio, TV, podcasts, etc. It's like an aural speed bump to me.

Could one of the grammar mavens itt please chime in and let me know: should it be "he" or "him" in this sentence?
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 10:06 AM
him
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 10:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by garcia1001
him
Agreed.

Edit:
Here we have a participial phrase ("sniping at each other") functioning as an adjective and modifying two nouns conjuncted together ("him and Gene"), which in turn is the object of the preposition. Take away the participial and the confusion goes away.

If it sounds wrong to a literate person, it usually is.

Last edited by NewOldGuy; 04-05-2013 at 10:49 AM.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by five4suited
I just read milleniums on the website of... wait for it... the New York ****ing Times.

the illiterate mother****ers surrounding us have won.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ObezyankaNol
An acceptable plural according to Merriam-Webster. We speak English; why should we use Latin plural forms?
it may be an acceptable plural; it's not an acceptable spelling.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 03:32 PM
I'm assuming that 54s was the one that left out the 2nd n, not NYT.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 09:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikech
it may be an acceptable plural; it's not an acceptable spelling.


lol at me. thought it looked wrong.

nevertheless, if millenniums is acceptable, so is octopuses, radiuses, etc. so unless this thread has had a "language grows and changes, common-use-and-so-on" conversation (which is pretty much bull**** imo), it is completely unacceptable.

in which case just enjoy the lulz I've provided for you peeps, ttyl
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 10:35 PM
Octopuses is the correct plural.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 10:35 PM
Actually, octopuses is correct.

Damn, sniped.
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote
04-05-2013 , 10:47 PM
Sick burns
"Grammar" and "Punctuation" nit's unite! You're "head" will literally explode! Quote

      
m