Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazuya
Just caught up with this thread from last few days, and despite lots of awesome posters it's clear there's a few posters in this thread who are subtle ETH trolls. I've made a decision I'm not going to respond to them personally anymore even if they quote my post as it's pretty clear to me they likely own no ETH at all (or possibly minimal) and/or are just purely trolling with the purpose of muddying the waters for the less-informed. To protect yourself, everyone should definitely do their own research outside of this thread/forum to get different viewpoints. And when you think you know a fair amount, go do even more research
Looking through the posts since your last one, I can't really see which ones you mean are trolling or trying to muddy the waters? Raising questions about solutions to issues that will affect ETH in the long term is pretty reasonable, if those are the posts you're referring to.
Also, how many ether someone holds is irrelevant to the validity of someones post. I agree that people should do their research, and get it from many sources. But this is a discussion forum, and I don't see a reason why some things shouldn't be discussed here, but should only be researched elsewhere.
Personally I'm very interested in Ethereum, but I have trouble investing in something I don't believe in long term. I have a bit of trouble trusting in the long term of ETH until I know there are solutions on the horizon for the obvious long term issues. I know that some people trust the developers when they say that they will solve it in time. That's not enough for me though, I would like to have some more info on how it will be done technically, so that I can make my own decision on if it's a good solution and if it's probable to succeed. I've looked around a bit and haven't found any good answers, but that doesn't mean the answers aren't out there.
I'm not saying ETH isn't worth anything without solutions to scaling problems, I think it's pretty good the way it is now. But not at this valuation, that pretty much factors in the trust in successful implementation of "sharding" and proof of stake. Well, a probability of success for them at least. But are there any publicly available solutions to those problems, that are deemed safe in an adversarial environment?