Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** *** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD ***
View Poll Results: Who will win the Durrrr Challenge II?
Tom "Durrrr" Dwan
1,577 41.89%
Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates
2,188 58.11%

08-30-2010 , 03:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximose
These guys are so aggressive and bluff happy. You can play solid ABC poker and pick off these bluffs like peaches in Georgia. Really though, you put a guy like Chris Ferguson or Phil Gordon in this challenge and it wouldn't be close. (Unless Dwan ran like God.) Obviously I understand the money would be insignificant to Ferguson or Phil, Cuz of their books and highstake limit games etc., but it would be nice to see them crush.
I think Phil hellmuth would perform even better vs durrr/jungle
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:24 PM
so does all the money durrr lost as a 50bb stack not count? what i mean is if he is down $10k or so after 50k hands can he turn around and say that those couple hundred hands did not count therefore they must play more?
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:24 PM
I see peoples point about Dwan being a more experienced net player, clicking tells, bet size reading etc., but Gordon and Ferguson prey on guys like this in the sky high cash games. I know its stupid to even talk about so dont flame too much cuz obviously Gordon wouldn't take the time too play for relatively small stakes, but still would be fun hypothetical.
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:25 PM
Durrrr just loves 3-balling 39s and 38s pf for some reason. He seriously loves those hands lol.
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:25 PM
if jungle is up say 3-400k with a few k hands left would it be ethical for jungle (if he thought it was +ev in doing so) to withdraw a massive chunk of his roll so he can shortstack...

durr making rules and not choosing to follow them is kinda confusing?! or was the rules for opponents only and he can do whatever the **** he likes lol..
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BT2
so does all the money durrr lost as a 50bb stack not count? what i mean is if he is down $10k or so after 50k hands can he turn around and say that those couple hundred hands did not count therefore they must play more?
nyet
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shpanko
Durrrr just loves 3-balling 39s and 38s pf for some reason. He seriously loves those hands lol.
he has straight blockers vs 56 67 etc
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximose
I see peoples point about Dwan being a more experienced net player, clicking tells, bet size reading etc., but Gordon and Ferguson prey on guys like this in the sky high cash games. I know its stupid to even talk about so dont flame too much cuz obviously Gordon wouldn't take the time too play for relatively small stakes, but still would be fun hypothetical.
Keep it coming bro! You a funny man.
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximose
I see peoples point about Dwan being a more experienced net player, clicking tells, bet size reading etc., but Gordon and Ferguson prey on guys like this in the sky high cash games. I know its stupid to even talk about so dont flame too much cuz obviously Gordon wouldn't take the time too play for relatively small stakes, but still would be fun hypothetical.
you are delusional and out of your mind.

Phil Gordon...seriously, dude?
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoInOne
I think Phil hellmuth would perform even better vs durrr/jungle
I realize you are likely joking, but Hellmuth did play Dwan heads-up twice where in the first match he got him to put in all of his chips as a 4-to-1 underdog.

And Hellmuth then destroyed him the next time they played.

Small sample size, yes, but Hellmuth, like him or not, did play very well versus Dwan.
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximose
I see peoples point about Dwan being a more experienced net player, clicking tells, bet size reading etc., but Gordon and Ferguson prey on guys like this in the sky high cash games. I know its stupid to even talk about so dont flame too much cuz obviously Gordon wouldn't take the time too play for relatively small stakes, but still would be fun hypothetical.
the first post was somewhat funny, but not anymore. Dude you have to learn when to quit. It might turn funny again if you keep going and going with this same bs for a few more days.
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximose
I see peoples point about Dwan being a more experienced net player, clicking tells, bet size reading etc., but Gordon and Ferguson prey on guys like this in the sky high cash games. I know its stupid to even talk about so dont flame too much cuz obviously Gordon wouldn't take the time too play for relatively small stakes, but still would be fun hypothetical.
I almost believe u
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:27 PM
LOL. Well obviously hes not serious. Just a funnyman at work.
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcadianSky
yes...bc 1000 hands is enough to reflect ANYONE'S "true winrate".

huh.. I said *if* it's his true winrate
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:27 PM
I'd love to see Durrrr vs Farha PLO challange, but he doesn't play online
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:27 PM
jungleman12 is crushing
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:27 PM
Nobody feed the trolls please, this thread has been derailed enough times already.
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jungleboy
if jungle is up say 3-400k with a few k hands left would it be ethical for jungle (if he thought it was +ev in doing so) to withdraw a massive chunk of his roll so he can shortstack...

durr making rules and not choosing to follow them is kinda confusing?! or was the rules for opponents only and he can do whatever the **** he likes lol..
or jungle just fold every hand and takes the 1.5 million

Edit : In before jungleman
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:27 PM
+170ish
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mich P Rich
What are the chances durrrr buys out of this after 1 or 2 more sesh's like this one?

I doubt he'd buy out no matter how bad he runs/ gets owned, but this challenge could kick his ass pretty hard.
0% chance he buys out
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:28 PM
jungle pwns again.........
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:28 PM
nice
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerPlayer80
I realize you are likely joking, but Hellmuth did play Dwan heads-up twice where in the first match he got him to put in all of his chips as a 4-to-1 underdog.

And Hellmuth then destroyed him the next time they played.

Small sample size, yes, but Hellmuth, like him or not, did play very well versus Dwan.
lol ur talking about shortstacked ST HUSNG's basically. TT vs AA was so std, this is not at all comparable to 50k hands at 100bb cash.
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jungleman
+170ish
being as unbias as possible, do you think you've run above or below the curve thus far?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isura
0% chance he buys out
this

Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerPlayer80
I realize you are likely joking, but Hellmuth did play Dwan heads-up twice where in the first match he got him to put in all of his chips as a 4-to-1 underdog.

And Hellmuth then destroyed him the next time they played.

Small sample size, yes, but Hellmuth, like him or not, did play very well versus Dwan.
posts like this make me cringe.
hellmuth would be crushed into oblivion against dwan in heads up cash over any decent sample size.
also, comparing tourney style to deep cash is effing absurd.
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote
08-30-2010 , 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jungleman
+170ish
FINNALY a post to listen to
*** Durrrr Challenge: Stage II; Daniel "Jungleman12" Cates - IN RUNNING THREAD *** Quote

      
m