Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
I thought you were making a case for why we shouldn't write off the PPC, and then I realized you were replying to Lozen's point about the Bloc. I have no idea what the point of your comparison is - the Reform party may have its origin in one region, but it ran candidates across the country. The Bloc exists only in Quebec, and its goal initially (and likely still is in the minds of many) was nothing less than breaking up the country. They are completely different from Reform or the PPC, and I can definitely see a case to be made for excluding them from debates. I don't think they should be, but I can understand the logic.
Why a political party like Bloc Québécois , should not be part of it when the totality of its electorate represent many smaller provinces combined ?
Should a political party be restricted just because of the design territorial of the country over the amount of the electorate it represent ?
May be by dividing Quebec in 4 parts would make the bloc more relevant because it was aiming at 4 «*distinct*» territory instead of 1 , like the reform party was ?
Fwiw , I never understood why the bloc never put some candidates throughout the country .
Frenchies do exist outside Quebec, shrug .
Anyway , i do believe political parties should be validated by the number of votes they bring in and not how much territory it draws from a map with anemic results .