Dude that is just **** posting, throw out a catch phrase and hope it sticks.

The worst an independent committee can do is point out that due to racist/paranoid back benchers, we might spend too much on IT equipment.

Its easily spun away and amounts to nothing in the scheme of things.

Unlike Russians helped Boris win Brexit.

That's bizarre, the government has faced rebellions over Huawei. It's being forced into changes of policy and its just the front line in the tensions building between the USA and China. Huge pressure is being put on the UK from both sides and the government is squirming. This is not just about some IT equipment ffs!

It's even brexit related because the only* sensible place for us to be when it comes to usa vs china pressures is with the EU.

*some may think it's in the warm embrace of the usa.

The Government is removing Huawei from our 5G network. (due to backbenchers)

The committee look at this and finds?

Insert something reasonable and worse than Russians helped Boris win Brexit.

Absolutely nothing bizarre about you being unable to manage that insert.

Holy cow.

Anyway another real issue is Galileo, oneweb etc. I look forward to another ridiculous dismissal of that as something the government wont be concerned about being scrutinised while they cower in terror about something a bit embarrassing about brexit.

So no actual insert just very typical handwave.

Cant think of anything to do with Huawei, mention something else. Say holy cow for emphasis.

We are only talking about a party/government built on the issue of Brexit.

I am sure they will be terrified that there base here's some bad news about oneweb.

This is is hilarious.

No one gives a single **** about your attempted tangents, they are half a paragraph on a website that gets removed after a few hours for an update on Katy Price.

okay oaf. I think you've illustrated my point enough.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...at-but-why-now

FYP

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ral-capitalism

Yes we know, but so what?

Again, the ISC looks at this, and finds INSERT HERE.

You dont have anything close to an argument until you insert here.

Insert here must be worse than (from article I linked above):

I have inserted, the insert is in your court. You could just say holy cow though and will probably do something along those lines rather than honestly attempt to progress your argument.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/poli...-a4497611.html

Insert here:

So far=




Just posting news articles about Huawei says nothing.

It might help if you genuinely didn't understand that the key issues are serious issues and very real politics.

Bolded is quoted for truth, another classic post empty of argument, content or evidence but full of handwave goodness.

There are plenty of serious issues and very real politics, you have yet to get close to substantiating or expounding upon in anyway how the issue you are handwaving for grim life for, relates to the this issue.

All you have to do is

insert here.

Fully expect another complete handwave of AIDS in reply.

So you now agree that Huawei is not just about a bit of IT. Also plenty of other very serious issues that will come under the gaze of this comittee?

Can you take the tiny step to scrutiny being awkward for the government?

Can you understand why they would want to have some control over the narrative?

Can you understand why grayling would be very attractive to them?

I have already acknowledged all those completely no **** sherlock things. Stop handwaving, or do you think pointing out those things is some kind of revelation.

wat? Cmon, who are you playing to, just stop.

What you have not acknowledged is how scrutiny of those things will reveal anything worse than what I have suggested.

The tory party is already reacting to Graylings fail, there are pictures of Corbyn all over the news cycle holding the redacted talks between USA and UK, "proof" of Russia helping Labour.

Huawei is an issue, but its not something that is going to have massive forbearance with the ISC, its much more relevant to trade etc, its a done deal, its going, what will ISC looking at that find that is so embarrassing Boris will helicopter in Grayling. Nothing, and to suggest otherwise is pure absurdity.


Its good you are admiting its obviously nothing to do with Huawei, how could it be, and are now trying to claim other issues, but cmon, if you are going to do that, you still have to do the one thing I have done.

Insert here.

Without insert here you just have a very weak random cool story bro hypothesis that aint worth a fart in the wind.

ok so bluster aside you can now acknowledge there are serious reasons for the government to want grayling that go into the future and way beyond a bit of embarrassment about the russian report?

The government is quite clear that the decision relates to US sanctions, though it does also reflect reasonable security concerns. Huawei is a Trojan horse.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/h...tworks-by-2027

'Quick, chaps! Let's look as if we're jolly tough on Russia! And could we all avoid mentioning Dominic's time in Russia, please?'

The Court of Appeal has ruled that she may return to the UK to fight her case in the British courts. So that's something.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53427197

No, stop.

Its obviously to try and stop publication of the report, the other issues are just bread and butter issues that normally find their way across the desk and Boris would not give a single **** about if there was some negative news or whatever because politically, some bad news about onenet is nothing.

Unless, Insert here.

just bread & butter lol

Maybe you have some ludicrous faith over boris' ability to butter this bread without any scrutiny he might want to avoid.

jesus

As you seem to know nothing about the security issues over leaving Galileo or about one web, I know you will appreciate some starter links

https://www.theguardian.com/science/...galileo-brexit