Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
British Politics British Politics

02-16-2020 , 01:50 PM
Of course, I mean all's good right. Right?
British Politics Quote
02-16-2020 , 01:54 PM
Johnson appointed a pro-eugenics aide.
British Politics Quote
02-16-2020 , 02:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PartyGirlUK
Johnson appointed a pro-eugenics aide.
That does not sound very jewish?
British Politics Quote
02-16-2020 , 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiMor29
That does not sound very jewish?
I'm concerned that the Overton Window hasn't really moved left at all.
British Politics Quote
02-16-2020 , 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiMor29
That does not sound very jewish?
I'm honestly not sure you mean - care to elaborate?
British Politics Quote
02-17-2020 , 05:34 AM
Oh...

British Politics Quote
02-17-2020 , 08:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
Oh...

This is an obvious example of the very thing I was posting about earlier.
British Politics Quote
02-17-2020 , 08:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Husker
This is an obvious example of the very thing I was posting about earlier.
Exactly
British Politics Quote
02-18-2020 , 04:54 AM
Following on from this, Dawn Butler thinks that "a child is born without sex".
British Politics Quote
02-18-2020 , 09:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
Following on from this, Dawn Butler thinks that "a child is born without sex".
I’m sure that’ll help win back the Labour Red Wall.
British Politics Quote
02-18-2020 , 09:39 AM
With that and the ongoing obsession with the Palestine/Israel they are certs for a landslide in 2024.
British Politics Quote
02-18-2020 , 01:28 PM
Jesus Christ, is MI5 poisoning Labour offices with stupid juice?
British Politics Quote
02-19-2020 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
Following on from this, Dawn Butler thinks that "a child is born without sex".
To be fair to Dawn, she immediately corrected it to "formed without sex". Unfortunately, that was just as stupid and wrong, since sex is determined instantaneously and irreversibly at the moment of conception, male or female, and this is true of every human being who has ever lived.

As far as I know, Dawn, now 50, has never had children, which is probably, on the whole and taking the one thing with the other, just as well.
British Politics Quote
02-19-2020 , 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 On Red
since sex is determined instantaneously and irreversibly at the moment of conception, male or female, and this is true of every human being who has ever lived.
You are miles out here.
British Politics Quote
02-19-2020 , 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 On Red
To be fair to Dawn, she immediately corrected it to "formed without sex". Unfortunately, that was just as stupid and wrong, since sex is determined instantaneously and irreversibly at the moment of conception, male or female, and this is true of every human being who has ever lived.

As far as I know, Dawn, now 50, has never had children, which is probably, on the whole and taking the one thing with the other, just as well.
Even by the incredibly low standards of scientific arguments I have come to expect in the debate around sex and gender identity this is ridiculous. Completely ignoring any social aspects of the issue there are a large number of people born intersex - between 0.1% and 0.001% of births depending on how strictly you define it. That is at least tens of thousands of people in the world right now who are not, and have never been, obviously male or female.
British Politics Quote
02-20-2020 , 04:36 AM
I see the Conservative Party now seem to think that unemployment is at 8 million in this country.
British Politics Quote
02-20-2020 , 02:35 PM
British Politics Quote
02-20-2020 , 02:49 PM
It's great to see some standing up against the extradition to the USA. Also

Quote:
Separately, the Council of Europe commissioner for human rights. Dunja Mijatović, said Assange should not be extradited because of the potential impact on press freedom and concerns about “the real risk of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment”, in contravention of the European convention on human rights.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...john-mcdonnell
British Politics Quote
02-20-2020 , 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willd
Even by the incredibly low standards of scientific arguments I have come to expect in the debate around sex and gender identity this is ridiculous. Completely ignoring any social aspects of the issue there are a large number of people born intersex - between 0.1% and 0.001% of births depending on how strictly you define it. That is at least tens of thousands of people in the world right now who are not, and have never been, obviously male or female.
It’s arbitrary anyways because biology doesn’t really care about man made definitions and categories. But by definition sexually reproducing species are divided into 2 sexes, male and female. And if you don’t fit into either of these categories you are intersex. If you want to argue intersex should be incorporated by definition as a sex, that is fine. But it currently isn’t in any dictionary or biology textbook I have ever read.
British Politics Quote
02-20-2020 , 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelhus999
It’s arbitrary anyways because biology doesn’t really care about man made definitions and categories. But by definition sexually reproducing species are divided into 2 sexes, male and female. And if you don’t fit into either of these categories you are intersex. If you want to argue intersex should be incorporated by definition as a sex, that is fine. But it currently isn’t in any dictionary or biology textbook I have ever read.
This seems entirely tangential to my post, the point of which was to point out that the statement "sex is determined instantaneously and irreversibly at the moment of conception, male or female, and this is true of every human being who has ever lived." is complete nonsense. Since you acknowledge that people can be intersex I'm not sure what your point is.
British Politics Quote
02-20-2020 , 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willd
This seems entirely tangential to my post, the point of which was to point out that the statement "sex is determined instantaneously and irreversibly at the moment of conception, male or female, and this is true of every human being who has ever lived." is complete nonsense. Since you acknowledge that people can be intersex I'm not sure what your point is.
My point is tangential, so fair enough. I will say, when it comes to biological rules, if your threshold for whether that rule is valid or not is as low as 0.1-0.01% of the time, you might as well throw your biology textbook in the trash; because pretty much nothing you will read in the entire book will reach that threshold.

Biology is a good framework to understand how biological systems operate. But it isn't that precise. In fact, making a statement and having it be true 99.9% of the time is actually pretty damn good. I am not sure anything is that precise outside of pure mathematics.
British Politics Quote
02-21-2020 , 03:40 AM
0.1% might be relevant for sexual differences identified at birth, but the figure is more likely 1% or higher when you factor in differences that develop during the lifespan, most commonly during adolescence.

Either way, neither number is insignificant when discussing sexual development. Dwarfism is far more rare than differences in sexual development, and I'm pretty sure most people can more readily identify whether someone is a dwarf or not more accurately than they can identify a person's sex.
British Politics Quote
02-23-2020 , 10:14 AM
Johanna Cherry is putting herself up for nominations to stand as an MSP in Edinburgh Central. Pretty ridiculous as she's already an MP and is claiming she can do both jobs.

The reason for this though, in addition to greed, is that she is positioning herself to go for the party leadership, as is her rival for the candidacy Angus Robertson.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...itics-51601035
British Politics Quote
02-23-2020 , 04:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Husker
Johanna Cherry is putting herself up for nominations to stand as an MSP in Edinburgh Central. Pretty ridiculous as she's already an MP and is claiming she can do both jobs.

The reason for this though, in addition to greed, is that she is positioning herself to go for the party leadership, as is her rival for the candidacy Angus Robertson.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...itics-51601035
I see she is now saying she will step down as a MP if she was elected. Hopefully she gets the nomination and wins the seat as she'll be a disaster if she manages to win the leadership of the SNP at some point. Completely charmless and very divisive, even within her own party.
British Politics Quote
02-23-2020 , 04:15 PM
"Completely charmless and very divisive" is almost everyone from the SNP, surely?
British Politics Quote

      
m