Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011

01-27-2011 , 09:35 PM
I guess I'm putting some more money back on Stars now.

Good Job guys!
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:37 PM
haha, as expected, fullstackers won't be happy until pokerstars direct deposit fish's money into their accounts
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:41 PM
so what kind of winrates will be attainable in the cap games?

imo majority of the fish will just play cap now 50bb tables are gone...
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xss127
haha, as expected, fullstackers won't be happy until pokerstars direct deposit fish's money into their accounts
Unfortunately this won't work either due to DOJ and processor issues.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynamics
so what kind of winrates will be attainable in the cap games?

imo majority of the fish will just play cap now 50bb tables are gone...
I was winning at 2.5bb/100 at the .25/.50 CAP games, obviously that was before the change though, so I haven't tried other limits since .25/.50 was pretty much the only choice unless you played nosebleeds.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:49 PM
40-100bb for heads up if you'd be so kind.

If not, 20-100bb is fine please just get rid of the 2 table types, it is the most unnecessary thing ever HU
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:49 PM
Well done Stars!
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:50 PM
Before we worry about ss fish migrating how are they even going to deposit? PS has shut off all deposit options for US now

Good changes though.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by curtains
I think moving to another tab is just ridiculous. Tons of players (myself included) are going to play a mixture of both CAP and NL tables, and this is extremely obvious. You want those players to have to switch back from tab to tab over and over? It's like the worst idea I've ever heard.

It's much much easier to play both CAP and NL tables simultaneously than it is to do the same thing with Limit and NL. It's not even a comparison. I can and have played CAP tables and NL at the same time without even the slightest bit of confusion. The rare times in the distant past when I tried to mix in Limit, it was unbelievably confusing.

Why in the world would you want to make it as hard and annoying as possible for players to play both NL and CAP tables at the same time?

A second point: I believe that NL and CAP are more similar than PL, which makes it even more absurd to change to a different tab. In CAP you can bet your effective stack size at each and every moment when it's your turn to bet, in PL you can't do that. The fact that the effective stack size will be smaller in CAP doesn't make it less like NL than PL. In fact playing PL at the same time as playing NL would be significantly more annoying to me than playing CAP.

Pokerstars should really think hard about unmixing the games, because it makes very little logical sense to me. To me it's just NL, with a maximum stack size. That's really not that different from straight NL, and there is not one other single rule that has changed.
First of all, let's get one thing straight. No limit and cap limit are two different betting structures. Here are the definitions of both the no limit and cap limit betting structures within poker. I'm sure we can all agree on them:

No limit: "A game played with a no-limit betting structure allows each player to raise the bet by any amount up to and including his entire remaining stake at any time (subject to the table stakes rules and any other rules about raising)." [1]

"There is no restriction on the maximum amount of bet in no limit games. You can bet your entire stack on one bet at any time in the game." [2]

Cap limit: "Hands in a cap limit or "capped" structure are played exactly the same as in regular no limit or pot limit games until a pre-determined maximum per player is reached." [3]

"In some no-limit and pot-limit games, there is a maximum amount any player can bet in one hand, or 'cap' on betting." [4]


Second, your entire argument is based solely on the statement that you will be playing both no limit and cap limit, and that you will find it annoying to go back and forth between the lobbies. Need I even tell you how silly this argument is, and how little weight it carries?

What if I want to play both fixed limit and no limit at the same time? What if I want to play both PLO and NLHE at the same time? Should Stars put them in the same lobby as well? The decision to have different tabs for different betting structures of a game is designed for the reason that they are, indeed, different betting structures, not to make it difficult for you to play both at the same time.


In regards to no limit and pot limit sharing tabs, I agree that it's also faulty given that they are two different betting structures, but it has its reasons. As far as I know, the pot limit games have never been very popular, so them having a tab of their own doesn't seem warranted. However, the cap games are much more likely to be popular, and should then have their own tab.

Not only because it's a different betting structure from limit, no limit and pot limit, but also because people that want to play cap should have an easy time finding the games. Just like people that want to play no limit should have an easy time finding those games. Pot limit games could have their own tab as well, but it seems like an insignificant change given how rarely those games run, and what a small percentage of the total games they represent.


I also think that Stars should immediately update their Texas Hold'em explanation page to include cap as one of the mentioned and underlined "major variations of Hold'em at PokerStars". [5] If you are going to introduce cap games on a large scale you should do it properly, and have them properly explained and represented on your site.


As for the numbered sources, I'm sure there are many more sites that agree with the quoted definitions for the different betting structures, as well as most poker players in general. It's common knowledge, really.

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betting_(poker)#no_limit
2. http://www.777onlinepoker.com/unders...o-limit-games/
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betting_(poker)#Cap_limit
4. http://poker.about.com/od/pokerglossary/g/cap.htm
5. http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/games/texas-holdem/
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82
You can see the seeds of it already. When this fails to increase game quality at 100bb because a lot of fish start playing CAP, it'll be,

"oh noez pokerstars, you're tricking fish into playing CAP, you should move it to a tab far away!"

So shameless.
You must either be clairvoyant or maaaybe it's because you lived in the SSer thread where putting the 20bb Cap games on another tab was probably the most suggested topic recently. This was almost as good as when you repeated ~100x that "fullstackers got what they wanted with 20-50bb tables, yet they are never satisfied".
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:16 PM
LOL at separate tab for CAP games. When we compromise we shouldn't be asking for things like that.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:23 PM
thank you pokerstars for these changes! especially the changes at $10nl and $25nl!

please put the CAP games in a seperate tab to No-Limit. there are clearly 20bb LIMITS in CAP games and is therefore not No-Limit.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:26 PM
the one question most people have seemed to miss, what will happen to all the players currently playing 20-50 at NL25? will they all move up to NL50 cap and get crushed?
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by needbeer
Steve,

Will HU CAP tables be offered at some point in the future?

-Kevin

P.S. Keep CAP on same tab imo.
+1

The white wizard speaks
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:28 PM
wow this is so great, wp stars!
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sub-Zer0118
PS has shut off all deposit options for US now
When did this happen? I deposited via e-check like... less than two weeks ago.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xss127
20bb cap poker will be the future

there should be 20bb cap tournaments, 20bb cap live events, 20bb cap tv poker, nosebleed 20bb cash games, etc
+1

red elf needs food badly
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlCaTrAzz
the one question most people have seemed to miss, what will happen to all the players currently playing 20-50 at NL25? will they all move up to NL50 cap and get crushed?
I guess? I suppose I never realized a $10 buy in was so soul crushing.


Seriously though, any explanation as to why cap games aren't available at less than NL50? I mean, I guess it'll be nice when fish try the cap games realize they can make Supernova on $10 buyins, but still.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82
When did this happen? I deposited via e-check like... less than two weeks ago.
eChecks are now shut off in a bunch of states. I made a deposit a month ago and I got a pretty email saying they never got the money from months ago and they deducted 500 from my account
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82
When did this happen? I deposited via e-check like... less than two weeks ago.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sub-Zer0118
eChecks are now shut off in a bunch of states. I made a deposit a month ago and I got a pretty email saying they never got the money from months ago and they deducted 500 from my account
I just deposited $100 on stars to see if this was the case. It let me deposit just fine...and i deposited about 2 weeks ago as well (just started playing again...didn't busto...but I am just a part time micro guy)
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:49 PM
Well done Stars.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:51 PM
The eChecks usually will go through, I will however warn you 15-30 days later do not be shocked if they get recalled.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:56 PM
offtopic...sidetracked
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashy
so no increased ratholing time?
FAIL

we are still getting ratholed on the 40-100 tables by the spanish ratholing army

I don't play in this tables, and i don't have nothing against you, but only can say one thing: fy.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 10:59 PM
echecks not related to the new cash game structures
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote

      
m