Quote:
Originally Posted by curtains
I think moving to another tab is just ridiculous. Tons of players (myself included) are going to play a mixture of both CAP and NL tables, and this is extremely obvious. You want those players to have to switch back from tab to tab over and over? It's like the worst idea I've ever heard.
It's much much easier to play both CAP and NL tables simultaneously than it is to do the same thing with Limit and NL. It's not even a comparison. I can and have played CAP tables and NL at the same time without even the slightest bit of confusion. The rare times in the distant past when I tried to mix in Limit, it was unbelievably confusing.
Why in the world would you want to make it as hard and annoying as possible for players to play both NL and CAP tables at the same time?
A second point: I believe that NL and CAP are more similar than PL, which makes it even more absurd to change to a different tab. In CAP you can bet your effective stack size at each and every moment when it's your turn to bet, in PL you can't do that. The fact that the effective stack size will be smaller in CAP doesn't make it less like NL than PL. In fact playing PL at the same time as playing NL would be significantly more annoying to me than playing CAP.
Pokerstars should really think hard about unmixing the games, because it makes very little logical sense to me. To me it's just NL, with a maximum stack size. That's really not that different from straight NL, and there is not one other single rule that has changed.
First of all, let's get one thing straight. No limit and cap limit are two different betting structures. Here are the definitions of both the no limit and cap limit betting structures within poker. I'm sure we can all agree on them:
No limit: "A game played with a no-limit betting structure allows each player to raise the bet by any amount
up to and including his entire remaining stake at any time (subject to the table stakes rules and any other rules about raising)." [
1]
"There is no restriction on the maximum amount of bet in no limit games.
You can bet your entire stack on one bet at any time in the game." [
2]
Cap limit: "Hands in a cap limit or "capped" structure are played exactly the same as in regular no limit or pot limit games
until a pre-determined maximum per player is reached." [
3]
"In some no-limit and pot-limit games,
there is a maximum amount any player can bet in one hand, or 'cap' on betting." [
4]
Second, your entire argument is based solely on the statement that you will be playing both no limit and cap limit, and that you will find it annoying to go back and forth between the lobbies. Need I even tell you how silly this argument is, and how little weight it carries?
What if I want to play both fixed limit and no limit at the same time? What if I want to play both PLO and NLHE at the same time? Should Stars put them in the same lobby as well? The decision to have different tabs for different betting structures of a game is designed for the reason that they are, indeed, different betting structures, not to make it difficult for you to play both at the same time.
In regards to no limit and pot limit sharing tabs, I agree that it's also faulty given that they are two different betting structures, but it has its reasons. As far as I know, the pot limit games have never been very popular, so them having a tab of their own doesn't seem warranted. However, the cap games are much more likely to be popular, and should then have their own tab.
Not only because it's a different betting structure from limit, no limit and pot limit, but also because people that want to play cap should have an easy time finding the games. Just like people that want to play no limit should have an easy time finding those games. Pot limit games could have their own tab as well, but it seems like an insignificant change given how rarely those games run, and what a small percentage of the total games they represent.
I also think that Stars should immediately update their Texas Hold'em explanation page to include cap as one of the mentioned and underlined "major variations of Hold'em at PokerStars". [
5] If you are going to introduce cap games on a large scale you should do it properly, and have them properly explained and represented on your site.
As for the numbered sources, I'm sure there are many more sites that agree with the quoted definitions for the different betting structures, as well as most poker players in general. It's common knowledge, really.
1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betting_(poker)#no_limit
2.
http://www.777onlinepoker.com/unders...o-limit-games/
3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betting_(poker)#Cap_limit
4.
http://poker.about.com/od/pokerglossary/g/cap.htm
5.
http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/games/texas-holdem/