Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011

01-27-2011 , 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack0
Im sorry, I still dont get you.

I shortstacked for a while while I started out. The big reason I was successful is because I had the advantage of shortstacking on a deep table. If everyone is playing short, the games are much harder to beat in my eyes.

Not that I care, Im a deepstack player now.
say I have 20 BB on the button.
MY hem says I get called 30% of time on my pushes.
7 times SB/BB fold = $10.5 dollars AT .5/1 tables.

3 times I get called. $10.5 / 3= $3.5 per hand

30% sb/bb calling = 15% hand range average. 20bb or $20-$3.5= $16.5 dollars per hand break even point.
example:

I push $20 and BB calls. Pot is now $40.50, but my break even is $16.50 + rake because of the 7 times folded. $40.50 raked is $38.50 and i need to win above $16.50 or 43% of there calling range wich is 15% on average. I pull out pokerstove and find wich hands are 43% or better equity against a 15% calling range.

That's short stacking friend. The advantage comes from the ratholing or going south wich pokerstars does for you at the CAP tables.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trueteller
curtains, +1
+1

The logic is irrefutable.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by curtains
I think moving to another tab is just ridiculous. Tons of players (myself included) are going to play a mixture of both CAP and NL tables, and this is extremely obvious. You want those players to have to switch back from tab to tab over and over? It's like the worst idea I've ever heard.

It's much much easier to play both CAP and NL tables simultaneously than it is to do the same thing with Limit and NL. It's not even a comparison. I can and have played CAP tables and NL at the same time without even the slightest bit of confusion. The rare times in the distant past when I tried to mix in Limit, it was unbelievably confusing.

Why in the world would you want to make it as hard and annoying as possible for players to play both NL and CAP tables at the same time?

A second point: I believe that NL and CAP are more similar than PL, which makes it even more absurd to change to a different tab. In CAP you can bet your effective stack size at each and every moment when it's your turn to bet, in PL you can't do that. The fact that the effective stack size will be smaller in CAP doesn't make it less like NL than PL. In fact playing PL at the same time as playing NL would be significantly more annoying to me than playing CAP.

Pokerstars should really think hard about unmixing the games, because it makes very little logical sense to me. To me it's just NL, with a maximum stack size. That's really not that different from straight NL, and there is not one other single rule that has changed.
agree.
20bb cap is similar to standard NL games, the only difference is effective stack sizes is smaller with CAP. You can still raise or bet any amount you want on any street up to the capped amount.

I also mix games so a different tab would be annoying. Full Tilt doesn't separate CAP into a different tab, let players use the filters to display or hide the games of their choosing.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:18 PM
LOL @ all the people lobbying for a seperate tab for CAP games here.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricepaw1226
Love the change
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelis123
LOL @ all the people lobbying for a seperate tab for CAP games here.
they just scared that all the fishies will go to the CAP tables, then they'll still cry foul when their 100bb games are still full of regs.

Last edited by gobby888; 01-27-2011 at 06:22 PM. Reason: i
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:22 PM
I want to say I think CAP needs its own tab. It's simply NOT NLHE and all the problems we've had have been because two different games were in the same sandbox. Steve said CAP games may extend to other sizes like 30bb or 50bb. If that happens, we run the risk of more problems that we've had in the past. CAP is a form of hold'em so keep it there BUT it's NOT no limit so give it its own tab.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelis123
LOL @ all the people lobbying for a seperate tab for CAP games here.
LOL. They want pokerstars to hide the small buy in games. Next they want the lettering on the CAP TAB to be real small wait and see.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:24 PM
and can anybody explain me, why are they cutting the 20-50bb tables?
what's so bad in them? 20-50 bb are more popular then 40-100bb and are also played on 25-50 (where the cap game exists for a long time). If there will be no 20-50 bb , there will be no game with 20-40bb stack available on stars ( and allmost all other rooms have it)
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phatty
I want to say I think CAP needs its own tab. It's simply NOT NLHE and all the problems we've had have been because two different games were in the same sandbox. Steve said CAP games may extend to other sizes like 30bb or 50bb. If that happens, we run the risk of more problems that we've had in the past. CAP is a form of hold'em so keep it there BUT it's NOT no limit so give it its own tab.
+1
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:24 PM
Pre-announcement: "It's going to be hilarious when all the fish move to CAP."
Post-announcement: "aajfkl;35425u08us9a0fduajkl;j2 ****ing CAP f25#$#@% cashing out now."

Was that thinly veiled desperation we were hearing earlier from a lot of the 1 post wonders?
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveMyBum
Can someone please explain how this hurts shortstackers. Can't they just do the same on the CAP tables? How is it different?
1.) No structural edge against deeper stacks
2.) Fishies might go away
3.) Volume of tables might be too low

Last edited by pineapple888; 01-27-2011 at 06:36 PM.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phatty
I want to say I think CAP needs its own tab. It's simply NOT NLHE and all the problems we've had have been because two different games were in the same sandbox. Steve said CAP games may extend to other sizes like 30bb or 50bb. If that happens, we run the risk of more problems that we've had in the past. CAP is a form of hold'em so keep it there BUT it's NOT no limit so give it its own tab.
+2


and lower the rake at micros please!!!
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:29 PM
cap should be in a different tab, by definition it's capped so it's not no limit. totally different game.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adi
cap should be in a different tab, by definition it's capped so it's not no limit. totally different game.
Of course CAP is no limit. Duh.

As Doyle says, REAL no-limit would mean you could bet your entire net worth at any moment, and if Villain can't match it, he has to fold. This variation was actually played way back when, but didn't last, for obvious reasons. Every other no-limit game is "table stakes" and the only distinction is what exactly those table stakes are.

People are going to argue for whatever is in their best interests of course (which is how to steer the fish in their direction) but it's completely clear that objectively it should be grouped with the no-limit games.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phatty
I want to say I think CAP needs its own tab. [...] Steve said CAP games may extend to other sizes like 30bb or 50bb. If that happens, we run the risk of more problems that we've had in the past. CAP is a form of hold'em so keep it there BUT it's NOT no limit so give it its own tab.
A 50bb Cap table and a 40bb Min Buy In non cap table can be played both with the same stack and betting structure between 40-50bb stacksize. They are closer together than to a 40bb min Buy In Pot Limit table.

A new TAB for CAP tables is reasonable for 20bb CAP but not for 50bb imo. But on the other hand 50bb CAP tables are not reasonable in itself with the new changes
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:34 PM
How about PL is it the same? But they are on the same tab that's just ridiculous wanting the fishes to go to ur tab. So lame...
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:35 PM
Table ninja for CAP tables NOW!!!!
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:36 PM
And LOL at 40BB tables not being short stack. I'm sitting with 40bb and raise 5bb and a deep stack 3-bets. Taking into account just a little fold equity I can shove 40% equity against his 3-bet range lol lol lol. Good luck 3-betting light

Last edited by TAGKILLA; 01-27-2011 at 06:43 PM.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:37 PM
So raise to 2bb...
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple888
Of course CAP is no limit. Duh.
So much fail in so few words. If a guy is sitting with 200bb at a NL table, his effective stack is 200bb (assuming other 200bb stacks obv). If the same guy were at a Cap table instead with 200bb, his effective stack is always limited 20bb... hence CAPPED, and NOT NL.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phatty
I want to say I think CAP needs its own tab. It's simply NOT NLHE and all the problems we've had have been because two different games were in the same sandbox. Steve said CAP games may extend to other sizes like 30bb or 50bb. If that happens, we run the risk of more problems that we've had in the past. CAP is a form of hold'em so keep it there BUT it's NOT no limit so give it its own tab.
Neither is pot limit but they are together in the lobby. Why is no one crying about how PLHE needs it's own tab?
Stars does what all the cry babies ask for and you all still cry that they are not directing the players right to you. Maybe they should just seat people at 40-100bb as soon as they log in. Hell make it a rule they have to play 3 rounds before they can play the game they choose to play.

Last edited by dogkicker666; 01-27-2011 at 06:53 PM.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaycareInferno
it should have its own lobby called "poison-dont go here"
ok i lolled.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogkicker666
Neither is pot limit but they are together in the lobby. Why is no one crying about how PLHE needs it's own tab?
Stars does what all the cry babies ask for and you all still cry that they are not directing the players right to them. Maybe they should just seat people at 40-100bb as soon as they log in. Hell make it a rule they have to play 3 rounds before they can play the game they choose to play.
Like I said ealier:

Quote:
Originally Posted by JH1
+1 for separate tab.

It is hold'em. But FL is not NL is not CAP. All separate tabs.
In before "What about PL in the NL tab" strawman.
Whatever. If putting CAP in it's own tab means we're out of line with PL being in the NL tab, by all means move PL to it's own tab. I certainly won't complain about those 3% of tables having to move.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote
01-27-2011 , 06:54 PM
It wouldn't bring tears to my eyes if pot limit was moved to another tab and if it meant CAP was moved to its own tab, I'd snap call. But, the reason pot limit can stay is because it plays like no limit. You can get a 100bb stack allin by the river if you keep betting pot.

Make no mistake though, ratholers will keep lobbying for ANY possible way they can leech off our game and stay in our tab.
PokerStars Ring Game Changes: Effective January 27th, 2011 Quote

      
m