Obviously they accept equivalents otherwise no foreign student could ever study at an English university without going through the rigmarole of gaining a 'to them' foreign English qualification.

Yeah, I fully understand that. I thought you were trying to prove you HAD to have GCSE English, didn't realise you were trying to prove the opposite. Sorry.

Right, it's just that a minute ago you said you HAD to have GCSE English.

Let me guess though, that obviously meant or equivalents and any intelligent person would have known that without saying and as I am lacking intelligence I didn't spot that and I should now do a google search of some sort ?

No.

I was wrong.

And when I discover I'm wrong I immediately admit it and correct the mistake so that the inaccuracy is not propagated any further than necessary.

Which part of "On checking, I found that, for at least one university, it was no longer the case so the assertion falls." did you not understand?

Is it not clear to you that I was admitting I'd made a mistake?

I suppose that's what comes of not even achieving the minimal standards of GCSE English.

Like I said, I understand it all, just missed it at the time.

It's completely clear to me.

I didn't even attempt or have the opportunity to attempt GCSE English, as I don't live in a country where that's an option. It wasn't a case of not achieiving GCSE English.

Top-Level Real Deal Poker Being Initiated into Coven


clearly, there is something evil about Real Deal if you must demonstrate loyalty by marking your flesh. it's probably an anti-semitic discrimination tool iyam.

Newly-minted Real Deal Poker Pro (?) gives his take on their "Dedicated Forums" - I guess the only way you can prove your dedication is by breaking God's law forbidding the mutilation of the body.
ya think the mods there have an agenda? at least we let 'tards be 'tards here, no matter how dumb.
each bullet point stupider than the last.

Here's a gem:

RNG deals

it has all the good stuff, rigtards at real deal, naysayers and even a guy who will soon become exasperated trying to explain that if you get your money in as a 75% favorite you'll win 75% of the time.

I've got some catchin' up to do with this forum today!

oh, here's the voice of reason there:
I guess he does say the "sample size" thing sarcastically, but that's not the only hole in his analysis. but it's probably sufficient for the epic dummies there.

I checked out their forums quickly after clicking your link. Sort of a really dumbed down version of this thread (riggies and shills alike)

http://www.realdealpokerforums.com/s...inning-to-many

is a good example. Pretty much the same patterns of human behavior as in this thread on all sides except literally everyone is amusingly stupid, with some bonus posts by the guy who created the site like

"I'm getting at the fact that Real Deal deals hands from a live deck of cards. Ur trying to goat me? Please. move on. "

Sadly nobody asked what he really meant by "trying to goat me"

OP of the thread mentioned above:
I bet a machine-shuffled-deck does work the same way as an RNG.
what are the true odds of this guy having data to back up this claim?

and here's the first reply:
so it's rigged then, huh?

gestapo tactics imo
nothing scarier than the prospect of Gene Goia knocking on your door in the middle of the night...

A dumbed down version of this thread?


That's even possible?

you tell me.

Ralph Wiggum would be bembarrassed for you if this was your work:

I am sure i made more than one bad post

1. Proved Superuser..not proofed how many are not catched
2. Proved DON ring..not proofed how many others cheat
3. Proved sponsoring deals not complete paid
4. Proved closing account..not proofed if thats all time correct

5. Proofed in general more and more software in use to get an edge
legal, half legal and non legal

By the way i was never a big winning player, but for a few years a parttime bonusabuser

Um, that's unpossible.

an attempt at humor. nicely done.
numbers 3 & 4 don't really seem to count as "proved." can you elaborate?

and I'm not sure number 5 counts as a scandal, but tbh, I'm not exactly sure wtf you're trying to say there either.
so what are you worried about?

anyway - and I'm being serious - I believe you can whore online Bingo sites. I don't know if they're rigged or not though, but it seems like easy money if that's all you're interested in doing.

no need to edit my quotes for me.

The Pokerz mus be rig. Too many bad beat.

this is a truly sad gimmick, buddy.


edit: truly, truly, sad.

But not a bad screen name....gotta love Scooby!

that's the only reason he's not banned.

3 & 4 i was never involved myself so anything is only from hearing and reading ...but i guess overall that is not a massive problem.

5 depends from the point of view.

If i play without any software is it " scam " that others use software, or is it OK i could use the software, too.

Is a Hud Ok..or is a programm that play 24 tables preflop also OK.
Principle a preflop- software do nothing that i dont do in real .

Or is a bot that play like me should be allowed too ?

Overall its not a big difference if you loose the edge against software or against a rigged deck. I have a OK fulltimejob and decided for myself that
there is not enough profit for me to play volume.

Yes, but that is because you don't have the skill to do so. You make it seem like it's because of the industry that you don't win. That's simply not true since there are plenty of winning players today.

Why do tha Shaggys wit da big stack keeps takin tha Scoobys short snacks even tho tha Scoobs in wit da best paw?

Its true i never do large efforts to improve my game..i mostly run for the free money in the old days.

But how many winning players use HUD, Trackingsites? 85%-95% ?
And how large is the software - edge ? 1-2 BB ?
And i have NOT PROVED doubts that people play 12 hours 24 tables without autofolders or other tools