Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition
View Poll Results: Is Online Poker Rigged?
Yes
3,508 34.88%
No
5,615 55.84%
Undecided
933 9.28%

06-25-2010 , 06:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14cobster
So you are saying they have the same shuffle as Full Tilt.
No, there is a subtle difference.

The search button is your friend.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 06:25 PM
I just read someone's account that poker stars shuffles the 52 cards at first and that is that. But I have to admit that Wiki's insinuation has caught my interest more than the original question. Great place to start a stupid argument
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiki
I think they are pretty much shuffling all the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14cobster
So you are saying they have the same shuffle as Full Tilt.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 06:28 PM
Stars uses a set deck afaik.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tk1133
nicely done, sir.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingOfFelt
Stars uses a set deck afaik.
don't they have some thing that uses atmospheric conditions as part of their algorithm?

(not joking)
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 06:42 PM
I believe that's the mouse movements.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 06:47 PM
When I go to a brick and mortar poker room I suffer the same bad beats and 2500-1 shot losses (2 perfect cards--I know odds are approximate--in a limit game 2000-1 and 2500-1 are the same as far as pot odds go--not worth it.)

Online you play faster and are more suspicious and are usually against better players.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiki
That's really funny.

I can see it's your ambition to become the world's greatest wit.

Well, don't give up because I have good news for you:

You're half way there already.
Far below your usual standard, wik. Must be getting tired!
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:00 PM
Playing faster, particularly six max online, is better to the extent that you need to see a bad player's stack dwindle.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucky Day
In a way, each of us has to face ******ation. For some, shyness might be their ******ation. For others, a lack of education might be their ******ation. For us, a ******ation is a big, dangerous man who wants to kill us. But as sure as my name is Lucky Day, the people of Santa Poco can conquer their own personal ******ation, who also happens to be *the actual* El Guapo!
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markusgc
don't they have some thing that uses atmospheric conditions as part of their algorithm?
(not joking)
Yeah, I think you are right, but it uses that information to draw a deck and it deals from that deck in that order throughout the hand. On FTP the deck is constantly being shuffled even after the hole cards have been dealt.

Josem can correct me if I'm wrong.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:23 PM
A bag of walnuts.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by robhimself
A bag of walnuts.
candied or raw? they better be raw
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiki
You're just getting your panties in a bunch over nothing.

You cannot emasculate the English language by removing every word that has negative connotations because otherwise you'll end up with nothing to do the job.

Where would you draw the line?

Could you say someone was an idiot or would there be a danger of upsetting the seriously idiotic?

The reason some of us (quite a lot in my experience of this forum) find '******' acceptable - in the context of this forum - is that it has never been an official description of someone suffering some affliction.

Using words that have been so used 'spastic', 'mongol', etc certainly would be unacceptable as would using words that have racial connotations and are associated with long term racist usage.


I thought maybe I'd been mistaken on this, but on searching for it, Wikipedia would appear to confirm my first thoughts:

'As of 2010, the Special Olympics, Best Buddies and over 100 other organizations are striving to help eliminate the use of the "r-word" (analogous to the "n-word") in everyday conversation.'

'In the UK, it is very important to understand that the verbs (?) '******ation' and '******ed' (along with private usage of '******') are highly, and completely unacceptable in both professional and personal situations - and it is deemed just as offensive as many other stereotypical pejoratives used in the United States. A BBC poll conducted in the United Kingdom came to the conclusion that '******' was the most offensive disability-related word.'

I genuinely thought the word became unacceptable many years ago and if not, it's clear from the two quotes above that it is certainly thought of as derogatory and in the process of being phased out.

As I said, many words have become offensive which you may not have once considered to be so, you have to be respectful enough of other people to stop using such words, WHETHER YOU BELIEVE THEM TO BE OFFENSIVE OR NOT and WHETHER THEY ARE DIRECTED AT THAT PARTICULAR GROUP OF PEOPLE OR NOT.

We live in a tolerant, accepting society and there is no need to be using a word which could be considered offensive, when there are 10 or 100 other words which aren't offensive which could easily be used instead.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatedToPretend
I thought maybe I'd been mistaken on this, but on searching for it, Wikipedia would appear to confirm my first thoughts:

'As of 2010, the Special Olympics, Best Buddies and over 100 other organizations are striving to help eliminate the use of the "r-word" (analogous to the "n-word") in everyday conversation.'

'In the UK, it is very important to understand that the verbs (?) '******ation' and '******ed' (along with private usage of '******') are highly, and completely unacceptable in both professional and personal situations - and it is deemed just as offensive as many other stereotypical pejoratives used in the United States. A BBC poll conducted in the United Kingdom came to the conclusion that '******' was the most offensive disability-related word.'

I genuinely thought the word became unacceptable many years ago and if not, it's clear from the two quotes above that it is certainly thought of as derogatory and in the process of being phased out.

As I said, many words have become offensive which you may not have once considered to be so, you have to be respectful enough of other people to stop using such words, WHETHER YOU BELIEVE THEM TO BE OFFENSIVE OR NOT and WHETHER THEY ARE DIRECTED AT THAT PARTICULAR GROUP OF PEOPLE OR NOT.

We live in a tolerant, accepting society and there is no need to be using a word which could be considered offensive, when there are 10 or 100 other words which aren't offensive which could easily be used instead.
We get it. You are offended by things that you read on internet message boards. Stop deflecting though and answer the below before you call other people's character into question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo_Boy
Thats excellent, glad to hear it. However, you stated that you had carried out calculations that showed something suspicious, so what happened? Were you lying? Did you calculate wrong?
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo_Boy
Thats excellent, glad to hear it. However, you stated that you had carried out calculations that showed something suspicious, so what happened? Were you lying? Did you calculate wrong?



Your original posts were standard rigtard material and it is hard to believe they would come from a mathematician. Anybody who has done a maths degree should have done a fundamental probability / statistics module even if they generally avoided that field. They wouldnt be making sweeping statements about what they "felt" about a huge amount of data because they would be well aware of the inaccuracies of doing so.

Your inability to understand simple logic is worrying for a mathmatician.

More generally, you seem unable to cary out the most simple tasks with a computer and I think you have asked "what does that mean" to simple words (menial? Appologies if it wasn't you. All you rigtards sound the same).

Your complete lack of progress in the most fundamental analysis of your hands (just checking how many pocket pairs you're dealt) seems incongruous with the rigours of a science degree.

You say you have a maths degree but instead of trying to get a real job with it (no offence poker pros) you are struggling to win at poker to such a degree that you cant aford a copy of pokertracker.

By proudly announcing you have a maths degree you are somehow devaluing it by association. Sorry to be an A-hole, but you did ask.


When I said I'd carried out calculations, I meant I'd calculated that aces or any other pair should be dealt once every 221 hands. I didn't say I'd calculated how often it was actually happening. If you check the post to which you're referring you will see that.

I did do several statistics modules at uni. I was commenting on what I felt I was witnessing as that was all I had to go on. I wouldn't claim what I felt was accurate without looking into it further. That would be naive in the extreme.

Also, I didn't know what the word 'menial' meant. Heard it used a few times before but didn't know at the time I asked. I am TERRIBLE with computers as well, not sure why that's so hard to believe, never really had to use them as part of my degree.

I am trying to get a job using my degree, believe me. Easier said than done.

I didn't mean to 'proudly' announce my degree, I don't generally do that as I don't think it's anything to be particularly proud of as I have seen how readily they hand them out. I was just making a point related to maths and felt it would be taken more seriously if I explained what knowledge I was basing it on.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatedToPretend
When I said I'd carried out calculations, I meant I'd calculated that aces or any other pair should be dealt once every 221 hands. I didn't say I'd calculated how often it was actually happening. If you check the post to which you're referring you will see that.
And this is what is frustrating. Figuring out how often you've been dealt certain hands is perhaps the simplest and easiest statistical analysis you can do. If you need help figuring out how to do so, then ask. But before you post anymore, don't you think you should at least figure out if what you thought you were observing was accurate?
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arouet
And this is what is frustrating. Figuring out how often you've been dealt certain hands is perhaps the simplest and easiest statistical analysis you can do. If you need help figuring out how to do so, then ask. But before you post anymore, don't you think you should at least figure out if what you thought you were observing was accurate?


I need help figuring out how to do so please ?
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatedToPretend
I need help figuring out how to do so please ?
1. Get your handhistories: if they aren't already saved on your computer, contact your site and they will send them to you: get as many as you call, all of them if possible.

2. Download either pokertracker 3 or holdem manager. you can google them. They each have free trials. Wait until you receive your HHs so you don't waste time. You can decide to buy later if you want.

3. Import your hands into the program (you should be able to figure it out, post if you can't)

3. In PT3 (i don't have HEM) got to the Hands tab. It will show you exactly how many of each hand type you have seen. You can play with filters if you want to see only pairs, for example. (can't remember if the demo allows access to all the features, hopefully this feature will be enabled.)

Hope this helps!
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 08:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arouet
1. Get your handhistories: if they aren't already saved on your computer, contact your site and they will send them to you: get as many as you call, all of them if possible.

2. Download either pokertracker 3 or holdem manager. you can google them. They each have free trials. Wait until you receive your HHs so you don't waste time. You can decide to buy later if you want.

3. Import your hands into the program (you should be able to figure it out, post if you can't)

3. In PT3 (i don't have HEM) got to the Hands tab. It will show you exactly how many of each hand type you have seen. You can play with filters if you want to see only pairs, for example. (can't remember if the demo allows access to all the features, hopefully this feature will be enabled.)

Hope this helps!

Unfortunatley I am not able to download these programs at the moment. I'm hoping to have them as soon as possible though.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 08:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatedToPretend
Unfortunatley I am not able to download these programs at the moment.
Why not?
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 08:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arouet
Why not?

I tried downloading them, clicked 'run' and nothing happens. A fault with my computer I think.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 08:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatedToPretend
I tried downloading them, clicked 'run' and nothing happens. A fault with my computer I think.
And have you tried their website for support? Gone to the forums?
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 08:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatedToPretend
I tried downloading them, clicked 'run' and nothing happens. A fault with my computer I think.
Can you run any exe files? Test this by clicking on Start/Run and typing in calc.exe and enter. If nothing happens, then you can't.

Some viruses, and removal of some viruses, will break the exe file association in Windows and not let them run.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555067

If that doesn't work, look here:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=&oq=&gs_rfai=

You then need to make sure your antivirus software is up to date and run a full system scan. I'd run a good spyware scan too, like superantispyware.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
06-25-2010 , 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spadebidder
Can you run any exe files? Test this by clicking on Start/Run and typing in calc.exe and enter. If nothing happens, then you can't.

Some viruses, and removal of some viruses, will break the exe file association in Windows and not let them run.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555067

If that doesn't work, look here:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=&oq=&gs_rfai=

You then need to make sure your antivirus software is up to date and run a full system scan. I'd run a good spyware scan too, like superantispyware.
also malwarebytes

oh and pt has a forum on 2+2, lots of places for help
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote

      
m