Actually, i have made some posts trying to explain why the software is manipulated, and how blatantly obvious it is, as have others on here tried to do. But, there are so many site promoters on here and people just plain out of touch with reality, it seems to be a waste of time. SO, why not hassle goofs like WIKI for the hell of it.

Great.

Please post a link to the post where you show the evidence for the 'blatantly obvious' manipulation.

LOL, you actually believe that you are hassling me?

You really are as stupid as you appear to be, aren't you?

WIKI, there is a poster here looking to take a survey of people who make 10,000 dollars a year playing online. Why dont you sign up? This is not a joke.

There are probably a couple hundred blogs with sharkscopes/graphs,etc that can prove this.

Maybe you could read those if you weren't trolling 24/7.

Be honest bro, anyone who can prove to you they make money at poker is obviously a site shill. Gotta love circular logic. No one who isn't a shill can prove to me they make money.

"I make money."

"That's because you are a shill".

The best in the survey.

1. for high profitable
2. at least 10 000 $

For me thats far away from the same

Now this is a real shocker!! I think the thread asking for survey members has already been deleted!!!!!!!

Yes, because 2+2, according to the ******s like yourself who insist on line poker is rigged, is 'in' on the deal and covering up for the site. (Despite allowing you to post your unsubstantiated drivel without let or hindrance).

So, of course they are going to prevent people who make half decent money which would suggest that the sites are not rigged against stronger players from promulgating that fact.

Er, wait ...

You just keep giving us more and more evidence of your staggering lack of analytical ability.

How would everybody in this thread being a "dreamer" or "site promoter" stop you from posting evidence of your claims? You can't even provide a logical explanation of your claims, let alone evidence. You might as well just say "there are too many people pointing out how stupid I am and it's not fair".

It would also be interesting for you to quote something in this thread that is "out of touch with reality" and evidence / explanation as to why you think this is the case.

Can your logic get any more moronic?

Ill say it again for the "slow" members like yourself. Ive already given examples, just like others have before. Not going to do it again and again.

FYP

Okay, if you didn't realise Wiki was levelling then you are probably not a gimmick.

If you did realise it and then relevelled, you're an even better gimmick than I thought.

So hard to pick which one...starting to lean more to the former.

I cashed out one time and the next time I played I got deal A 10 and another guy at table has A Q. The final board read A 7 J 3 6. Now you tell me something fishy isn't going on.

Full Tilt is currently allowing a player to buyin multiple times to the same tournament. It is NOT a rebuy tournament. I took this guy out over an hour ago with my AA vs his QQ and he shows back up on my table! I have a screen shot showing he was busted out 3 times and is still in the tournament with the same name! How is this possible!? Tournament is STILL going on: 214258739. Super Stack $28K Guaranteed....[IMG]http://************/699lv22[/IMG] -- http://************/699lv22

lol multi-entry tournaments bringing out the rigtards. nh ftp.

Impossible. I tested it to see if it's fishy and it is. I took a deck of cards and dealt out 6 hands face up and a 5 card board, 2 times just to be sure, and both times there was only 1 player who would have had an Ace. Rigged.

So much fail in this thread. Truth, I already posted my graph so I guess I must work for the poker sites according to your logic?

Oh wait, I forgot, my graph is fake.

Also lol at people playing multi-entry tournaments without knowing they're playing in them.

And the worst part is next hand they deal me 54. Woulda been a straight if I had it the hand before.

Isn't it weird how rigtards and fish think exactly the same way?

Hmmmmmmm...

I sat down at a bricks and mortar site and was immediately dealt Kh Qd.

WTF?

How the hell could that happen if the deck was not rigged?

Not sure if that really happened or not but I'd say thats pretty unlikely to happen again.

I do hope the multi entry tournaments generate some great paranoid beliefs that completely ignore how the site grabs a chunk of rake simply by offering the multiple entry feature in and by itself.

Even if the guys at Tilt came on here and posted various forms of "muhaha look at how we get money from people who need to gamble right away with a simple game format change" all that would be considered is a cover up for the sinister way they set up the entries to punish "winning players" who just cashed out who had a small stack against a flush draw on a Tuesday with their laptop.

I was disappointed Rush Poker did not generate any real solid riggie beliefs (I guess most riggies play casual low buy in MTTs), so hopefully this one will better hit the mark.

I once was trusting like you guys then a couple weeks ago a very reliable source told me the card randomizer may or may not be 100% random.

Change any minds?

Its like the guy that enters a two way street - with a sign on it announcing so - and says: "wtf, there are guys coming from the other side!"

Kind of funny, in fact...

As has been stated many times before, if it's blatantly obvious, it should be pretty easy to provide evidence.