Quote:
Originally Posted by swissmiss
What? No.I said their voices are important and I have a hard time seeing what is so bad about them.
You're simply wrong about this. Their voices aren't important
anymore. There have been investigations, independent studies, you name it. Things were looked into, then debunked. It's over. That argument is done. Saying over and over that "they may have a point" after it's investigated is simply stupidity.
This is exactly what people do on issues like Benghazi or the vaccination-autism-link or holocaust denial or 9/11 truthers. Every single one of those points have been investigated and debunked by indepedent and bipartisan experts in their respective fields.
It's like banging your head against a wall. In some cases like 9/11 truthers or Benghazi, it just makes you look like an idiot. In the case of holocaust denial, it makes you look like an anti-semite. In the case of vaccinations, it is actually dangerous.
Honestly, swiss, everyone is trying to explain this to you. It's as simple as simple can be. There is no controversy. There is no debate, no whistle-blowing, no nothing. These arguments are no longer arguments because they have been proven as invalid, without merit or insignificant. Anyone who thinks 9/11 is an inside job just doesn't get a voice anymore.
Why is this so hard to understand?