And intellectual freedom, free speech, freedom of association, and human rights.

Uh, sexism. Really?

This is amessage board spank, not real life and we are not the govt

You really think the liberal message is: More tolerance and open-mindedness to racists, homophobes, anti-semites, and other divisive positions. Hey let's just give all these positions more airtime so we can really hear them out. They might be on to something, you never know!

Yep, that's what liberal leaders, liberal media, and liberal rank and file are always going on about. You really nailed all those fake liberal hypocrites on 2+2 that don't sing this song!

No. We are real people here, on earth, where this forum is located. Your weak justification for abusing people is dismissed with very basic reason. Don't expect to abuse people here and not get a response.

And **** your disgusting, sexist post. Most foul.

Whoa, whoa, I've missed a few pages here and need to catch up, but are people suggesting Politics posters don't like SMPers? Wtf?

Swiss, I've explained it multiple times. You either don't get it or refuse to acknowledge it. The only other way I can think of explaining it is in a question. Is there any debate where a person brings up a refutation or point that is so ridiculous you have to dismiss it? Just name it, and then apply it to this issue.

I honestly can't explain it in any more ways.

We are suggesting SMPers are tards.

I agree with most of this. But this is PU, so it must be taken in context.

The comma thing is kinda funny though.

yeah, but it's only because you're all a bunch of illogical morons who like to congratulate each other on being super duper smart for questioning things like how okay it is to shoot minorities because statistitcs

Aargh. I know I won't be able to that. And I know I should. But nevertheless your advice is appreciated very much. I am still grappling with your PC thing, it is interesting.

I'd like to hear your comparison of the worst SMPers vs the worst Politards.

As I have said, no Nazis or Nazi followers there.

worst politards to have been banned, or worst that are still around?

Okay, well you're entitled to those opinions, of course. Would you accept it as fair for me to point out not only are they off base entirely, but also as childish as a thread devoted to who you middle schoolers all collectively believe is the worst poster?

Ok yes, I will dismiss some arguments. The question is just: why?

Never considered it. Should I have?

Both might be more interesting.

It's certainly your opinion that our opinions are off base.

Of course, after your performance on #teamBruce, it's pretty obvious that, aside from being completely insane, you are completely out of touch with reality.

So, to give our opinions the same weight as yours is demonstrably faulty.

Okay, fun hypothetical. So let's say someone from the middle east wanted to talk politics and stumbled on our funny little forum. Maybe he googled "best politics forum" lol. Say maybe he was thinking of joining ISIS and killing him some infidels, but first thought he'd give some of us a chance to explain ourselves and our position on matters meaning the most to him. Would you say his experience here would make him more or less likely to join ISIS and try to kill us.

I was being contrarian.

Oh, that is apparent. I made it to like the second round of your contest and everything. Very well documented. Are you on the school newspaper by chance during study hall?

Of course, the context is they have to deal with a response and can't hide behind mods if they overplay their hand. The fact we can post almost anything doesn't mean that anything posted is free of consequence. It's places like these where we truly find out what people's characters are made of, IMO.

Yah the comma thing is pretty minor, I do not object to friendly teasing and it seems swissmiss takes it that way for the most part. The challenge lies in determining what's friendly teasing and what is dumbass cruelty; and if a person is actually okay with either.

You know wil, I have always respected your straightforwardness as a poster, even when I thought you might be kinda racist in that c-walk thread. I'm glad I was wrong to think that.

? you are a mod and you called me a truther even though we hadn't discussed the report and even though I said that all my criticism doesn't mean the events did not happen as described. You were the one calling me a truther and you should prove that you were right.

By targeting another poster like that? Did the pile-on gang find it funny?