I can kind of understand for the most part. For instance, in the Smackdown Recall comments that type of response was given to a post that had the following quotes:
Quote:
(I thought the WrestleMania booking was horrible, but my response was lost. Go figure.)
Quote:
It gets to be a bit ridiculous, and undermines the legitimacy of the illusion of athletic competition (I know the cat has LONG been out of the bag here, but if this doesn’t exist, then why wrestle at all? Why not just have debates? Or chess matches? Why isn’t it just a soap opera?)
Quote:
On Kozlov challenging legit MMA fighters: Terrible, horrible, career-killing idea.
Quote:
So almost all around, this seems like an unfathomably terrible idea, even if you don’t follow MMA and Puro like I do.
It seems to always come after one of those "these things suck, I know what im talking about because i follow xxx (in this case MMA and Puro), etc" types of posts from people who don't seem to know/want to have a civil discussion. I can't blame him for the "Theres no reason to respond normally to you" mentality he gives those people, although I'd still at least attempt to personally.