Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Making a Murderer Making a Murderer

09-21-2016 , 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EfromPegTown
As soon as someone presents a plausible theory on how TH was murdered that fits with the evidence, I'll consider presenting one of how I think someone else could have committed the crime.
The theory had been presented. Many people seem to think it takes a criminal mastermind to clean blood off a floor and burn evidence in a bonfire. They also believe he wouldn't be dumb enough to hide the victim's car half-assed in his own salvage yard, even though by all accounts he's exactly dumb enough to do just that.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 10:31 AM
The prosecution in this case couldn't even decide on a single narrative that fit all the evidence. So they presented 2 different theories in 2 separate trials.

Are you saying you know better than them?
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 12:36 PM
I'll settle for who you think did it, no theory.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EfromPegTown
The prosecution in this case couldn't even decide on a single narrative that fit all the evidence. So they presented 2 different theories in 2 separate trials.

Are you saying you know better than them?
The prosecution did whatever they wanted. Even after the trial, they claimed that SA raped TH, yet didn't even charge him with that offense.

Last edited by golfnutt; 09-21-2016 at 01:22 PM.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 01:21 PM
I'm inclined to think it was a few people who were likely liable in a multi million dollar lawsuit.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33
The theory had been presented. Many people seem to think it takes a criminal mastermind to clean blood off a floor and burn evidence in a bonfire. They also believe he wouldn't be dumb enough to hide the victim's car half-assed in his own salvage yard, even though by all accounts he's exactly dumb enough to do just that.
Except he didn't clean the blood (or DNA) off the floor. His Blood and DNA (and other people's DNA) was found all over. However TH's and BD's DNA were never found in the trailer or garage.

Your story is a heaping pile of sh*t. It has been from day one. Hence the wild popularity of the documentary.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 01:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by happyhappy...
I'm inclined to think it was a few people who were likely liable in a multi million dollar lawsuit.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 03:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by revots33
The theory had been presented. Many people seem to think it takes a criminal mastermind to clean blood off a floor and burn evidence in a bonfire. They also believe he wouldn't be dumb enough to hide the victim's car half-assed in his own salvage yard, even though by all accounts he's exactly dumb enough to do just that.
And bold enough to give a TV interview right next to the bones, calm enough to meet with police and let them search his trailer, and crazy enough to go on vacation.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by happyhappy...
I'm inclined to think it was a few people who were likely liable in a multi million dollar lawsuit.
Ok, so I'm assuming you mean the former sheriff and former DA, who were the only two individuals liable and who would be indemnified by the county - i.e. not personally liable for any payment (barring some absolute bombshell that has never surfaced). In turn, the county was covered by insurance and the insurance companies had no contested this (except for the former sheriff's own home-owner's insurance) and indeed ended up covering the settlement.

Besides the over-exaggerated motive though, is there any evidence that leads you to believe they were the ones involved?

How do you think it was all done? Who was all involved in the murder and the frame-job and how?
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
I think he does want an answer.
PoorSkillz has said he has me on ignore. How is he going to obtain knowledge of any answers?

It's blindingly obvious these are merely rhetorical questions.

Quote:
I do too. If you think he is innocent and framed aren't these the next logical questions to ask yourself?
I do think Steven is innocent of any crimes against Teresa, for reasons already laid out.

My doubts about the prosecution case are more than reasonable. Unlike the jury in Steven's trial, I know that they couldn't even settle on one theory of the crime - it's blatantly obvious the prosecution doubted its own case!

Exactly how the framing was carried out is something that waits for the results of a thorough investigation, which is what it appears Zellner is engaged in.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorSkillz
Ok, so I'm assuming you mean the former sheriff and former DA, who were the only two individuals liable and who would be indemnified by the county - i.e. not personally liable for any payment (barring some absolute bombshell that has never surfaced). In turn, the county was covered by insurance and the insurance companies had no contested this (except for the former sheriff's own home-owner's insurance) and indeed ended up covering the settlement.
It's not clear if the insurance would cover payouts in cases of malice.

They did end up covering the much smaller settlement because the case never proceeded any further due to the 'coincidence' that Steven was charged with serious crimes and needed money ASAP to defend himself.

Otherwise Steven would have ended up with a creep like Len Kachinsky instead of competent lawyers.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 05:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorSkillz
Ok, so I'm assuming you mean the former sheriff and former DA, who were the only two individuals liable and who would be indemnified by the county - i.e. not personally liable for any payment (barring some absolute bombshell that has never surfaced). In turn, the county was covered by insurance
Not necessarily. Let me restate: likely personally liable, including the MCSO.

Quote:
How do you think it was all done? Who was all involved in the murder and the frame-job and how?

Well, dude, we just don't know.

That's what everyone with an IQ over 10 is trying to figure out in here.

With millions of dollars at stake, I think it's probably as simple as the organization that has a history of being corrupt just hired an unsavory professional they probably knew personally, and that they had SA's phone tapped, and the pro found his opportunity that day.

Last edited by Heady; 09-21-2016 at 05:22 PM.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorSkillz
Ok, so I'm assuming you mean the former sheriff and former DA, who were the only two individuals liable and who would be indemnified by the county - i.e. not personally liable for any payment (barring some absolute bombshell that has never surfaced). In turn, the county was covered by insurance and the insurance companies had no contested this (except for the former sheriff's own home-owner's insurance) and indeed ended up covering the settlement.

Besides the over-exaggerated motive though, is there any evidence that leads you to believe they were the ones involved?

How do you think it was all done? Who was all involved in the murder and the frame-job and how?
Obviously this is all standard minimization techniques utilized by shills. There are countless articles and attorneys who have posted on reddit that absolutely destroy everything PooShillz has said here. Feel free to search yourself.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 05:29 PM
Of course. I entertained his soulless persona in a moment of weakness.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heady
Not necessarily. Let me restate: likely personally liable, including the MCSO.
This is simply false. I've explained before:

Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorSkillz
Yes, of course the county would still have to pay the deductible, and probably any amount above the $5 million coverage.

This was not the end of the world (or county) however.

Just to be clear, the individual defendants would be indemnified by the county, since all parties (individual defendants, the county, and Avery) agreed the defendants had acted under color of law and within the scope of employment. This means the individual defendants would not be on the hook for the potential financial judgment and would be covered by the county.


For more information on why the lawsuit motive is ridiculously overblown, one can read some reddit threads here, including a Q&A with someone claiming to have been a civil defense lawyer on the case being discussed.
Do some further reading and you will see that the defendants were clearly going to be indemnified by the county.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Heady
Well, dude, we just don't know.

That's what everyone with an IQ over 10 is trying to figure out in here.

With millions of dollars at stake, I think it's probably as simple as the organization that has a history of being corrupt just hired an unsavory professional they probably knew personally, and that they had SA's phone tapped, and the pro found his opportunity that day.
Can you give me a reasonable theory (in your opinion) for how it all took place though? Use your imagination to fill in the blanks; just adhere to the known facts, please.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 05:45 PM
Nah. I don't think you're sincere enough of a human being to respond to anymore than I already have.

Last edited by happyhappy...; 09-21-2016 at 05:46 PM. Reason: Using two devices, sorry all. Happy = heady
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 05:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by proudfootz

Otherwise Steven would have ended up with a creep like Len Kachinsky instead of competent lawyers.
Everything about Wisconsin is unique.

***Wisconsin is the only state in which “local” graduates of Wisconsin law schools approved by the American Bar Association (ABA) do not have to take the state bar examination in order to be admitted to the state bar.***

All you have to do is not flunk out of any law school in Wisconsin, and you can start practicing as a lawyer.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 05:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by happyhappy...
Nah. I don't think you're sincere enough of a human being to respond to anymore than I already have.
The words of someone who tried and failed to think up a reasonable framing theory.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 06:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfnutt
Everything about Wisconsin is unique.

***Wisconsin is the only state in which “local” graduates of Wisconsin law schools approved by the American Bar Association (ABA) do not have to take the state bar examination in order to be admitted to the state bar.***

All you have to do is not flunk out of any law school in Wisconsin, and you can start practicing as a lawyer.
...and they made this guy - who spent more time trying to convince the press and public his client was guilty than he spent with his client -they made this POS a judge!

https://www.linkedin.com/in/len-kachinsky-49021b15
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 06:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoorSkillz
The words of someone who tried and failed to think up a reasonable framing theory.
The words of someone profiting off of the exploitation of innocent people and ruined lives based on the beliefs that their lives are of little value to society.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 06:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by proudfootz
...and they made this guy - who spent more time trying to convince the press and public his client was guilty than he spent with his client -they made this POS a judge!

https://www.linkedin.com/in/len-kachinsky-49021b15
Smart move going to the press and the public. BD isn't voting -- the public does.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostinthesaus
Obviously this is all standard minimization techniques utilized by shills. There are countless articles and attorneys who have posted on reddit that absolutely destroy everything PooShillz has said here. Feel free to search yourself.
I am an attorney and have experience defending big insurance cases. I had already weighed in on my take in this thread.

If you don't want to dig it up, I put the settlement value of the case at around 10 - 15 mm. Trial value would have been substantially higher.

Also, I offered the opinion that individuals would face exposure as well.

Poorshillz is completely wrong on that topic and demonstrates that he or she does not have any idea of how civil litigation or insurance policies work in the real world.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 06:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heady
Not necessarily. Let me restate: likely personally liable, including the MCSO.




Well, dude, we just don't know.

That's what everyone with an IQ over 10 is trying to figure out in here.

With millions of dollars at stake, I think it's probably as simple as the organization that has a history of being corrupt just hired an unsavory professional they probably knew personally, and that they had SA's phone tapped, and the pro found his opportunity that day.
You think its likely that they hired a hit man to not kill SA but instead kill an innocent woman? Why wouldn't they just kill SA?
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
You think its likely that they hired a hit man to not kill SA but instead kill an innocent woman? Why wouldn't they just kill SA?


It's tough to say what goes through the mind of corrupt LE officers in a case like this. I would guess killing SA would seem a little too obvious. Again, we're talking millions of dollars and multiple peoples professions at stake here. Imo, yes, that could bring into play an innocent passerby.

That's the big question, how does TH tie into this? I've always wondered if maybe TH had a one off or short lived affair with someone in LE. I only thought that because someone wrote she was a criminal justice major. I never looked further into it. I don't know.

Far fetched, but their corrupt actions leave pretty much anything in play.

One thing is for sure, burning a body that thoroughly takes some serious work.

Edit- And they wouldn't have had to hire a hit man, just simply contact another unsavory professional within their corrupt organization of LE.

All speculation of course. I hope we find out.

Last edited by Heady; 09-21-2016 at 06:59 PM.
Making a Murderer Quote
09-21-2016 , 06:56 PM
Making a Murderer Quote

      
m