Quote:
Originally Posted by ProBoyMagic
trying to get a gauge from actual law students with hindsight / experience. if you could go back to the application process, what's the lowest ranking school you'd go to with a) no money? b) some money? c) full ride?
fwiw i have 3.6 / 163 / URM and i'm considering everything from full ticket at uc hastings / davis / berkeley (if i get in) to full ride at pacific / unlv.
also, i'm interested in either PI or crim defense. also considering PD or ADA but obv not sure yet. and i want to stay in the SW (cali, AZ, vegas)
tyty.
I went to a TTT on a full ride, but I already had intern experience into the field I wanted to do and had a very good idea of what I needed to do in order to get a job in my field (patent). Before I went to law school, I already put several plans in place and I also had several backup plans to ensure that I would break into the field upon graduating.
In fact, it worked out so well that most places I applied to, I was more or less a shoo in with only a cursory interview, and the employers didn't seem to care what school I went to or to some extent, what my law school GPA was (my GPA was pretty bad; just barely enough to maintain my scholarship). That being said, a lot of the people ranked higher than me in law school could not find a job for almost a year after graduation, and this was 2008.
If you have that kind of planning already laid out, then go for the full ride. If not, and you are
absolutely sure you want to be an attorney, then go for the highest ranked school you can get into, study and network like your life depended on it (because it does), and pray that the economy turns around by the time you get out.