These cool roles can be pretty stressful and then you wish to get something easier without any powers.

To lose a game due to a ****ty POE type scenario where everyone basically claimed/character hinted due to lore, as opposed to losing because you have been deemed wolfy because of behavior or voting patterns is absolutely the ****tiest way to go.

For future games, I feel like some limits have to be placed on the wishing.

I think we should eliminate mod peeks altogether and at least leave the option of someone lying, and counter claims, up in the air. Giving the village a free mod peek every day is pretty powerful, especially when we have 3-4 other seer roles already.

The QB mod peek was pretty devastating to the wolves.

I'm goat gg all but baud

yep that D1 before QB peek where we have 7-7 W-W wagons and you're on a villager was GOAT

My role said redirect!!!!!1

This makes um 6 straight games where I lived to the end, 5 V 1 W. 3-3

there has to be an award for mediocrity for that.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/59...hread-1328933/

i will say that this particular neutral role would have been great had wg tried to achieve his wincon

indeed


Telco DID peek weather guy...


WP all

Yeah, I'm not a fan of wish granters either.

i agree

You may be conceptually right, but I rather doubt anyone saying "Hard claim I was granted my wish, QB is a wolf" on d1 of a game would have resulted in anything different.

yeah the modpeeks were super strong

yea i mean an unhuntable super seer is just not ww

good post obv

Felt like the whole village was seers from the other side.

I was on a wolf team of 6 that got swept once in a vanilla+. 2 tammates outed themselves to (unsuccessfully) save our 1x vig on day 1.

To be fair, I also posted terribly thorough the game.

i would have stoped posting after wg claimed a bopolis shot

pinocchio game is fun to read because of the LOST WOLF COVER of 2013

in hindsight I should have made the reality gem 25 or 50% chance to grant wish ldo

I'm the best. That play was bananas and amazing
Not just thy I left my real peek very clear.
I called puzzles V and bunnies villager.
Then a said a few times I didn't peek puzzles and he's prob a wolf slanking and said in the same sentence:
Bunnies still a villager... I mean.
It dare kruze who was getting shot so good.
Filthy should move allowed to play. He trolls the game and it's no better or worse than other people we banned before.
I will shoot him even if he is peeked so deal with it.
Yes. And personal too
I'm tired of attacks on me that have no reason but trolling and sabotaging.
Chatty and filthy need to be talked to or I will go back to troll Games, cheat, angle shoot and play against my Wincon like they do.
Shooting people cuz I don't like them and voting them.

Not kidding.
Someone report this post so POg mods can take notes. They don't listen to me and anything against me is fair games.
Including sabotaging a game and sending Pms while game is ongoing to mess with my reads.
Or joining games by filthy were all his post contain Batm is a wolf or a bold vote of Batm or a red bold shot of Batm. Last 5 games in a row
Or chatty pushing me 100% of the games we played in the last year or two.
Seems excessive.
Then just check how many times I shot them or I matterfact ignored or cleared.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...ostcount=12187
26:2
When I came in we had what?

28?

This power is not THAT good for wolves, since 9/10 times it is wolves who are slacking.

If that was the Lion King game, I both concede that that was a pretty bad wolf team while telling you that you had it easy compared to the ****show that was that Alice game.

My reaction when I learned that in a field of ~30 players we had 2/3 wolfs that were not in the crosshairs or outed