Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

02-06-2017 , 04:49 PM
@SUB: When Anderson Cooper asked Trump if he sexually assaulted women, and he stalled a long time before answering no when pressed, he was cleary lying with intent. Some of his falsehoods are for sure delusions, but by no means all.
02-06-2017 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
The rest of what you posted didn't really make any sense, frankly.
Donald Trump is like a 3 year old in that he cannot tell the difference between truth and fiction. Thus he is incapable of lying.

He makes delusional statements that he genuinely believes to be true which is why he is able to say what he says with a straight face. Deceit requires mens rea. Trump doesn't have that when he talks because he actually thinks he's telling the truth.
02-06-2017 , 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
The rest of what you posted didn't really make any sense, frankly.
Actually, it does.

Trump is saying things that are not true. Think of like a 3-4 year old. They say things all the time that are incorrect. But they are unaware that what they are saying is not true. But you as an adult wouldn't think the 3 year old is lying. You understand that they are incapable of knowing what the truth is.

With Trump, it's basically accommodation/assimilation.

A 3 year old sees a dog and says "Doggie!" The parent says "Very good!" Then the kid sees a horse and says "Doggie!"The parent says, "No, that's a horsie!" The kid says "Horsie!" and the parent says "Very good!"

You wouldn't say the kid is lying. He just doesn't know.

Now try it with Trump. Pretty ****ing scary when you think about it.
02-06-2017 , 05:00 PM
Trump absolutely knows he is lying. He's just a narcissist who has very low self-esteem.
02-06-2017 , 05:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
@SUB: When Anderson Cooper asked Trump if he sexually assaulted women, and he stalled a long time before answering no when pressed, he was cleary lying with intent. Some of his falsehoods are for sure delusions, but by no means all.
Of course both of us are speculating on what's going on in Trump's mind. For all we know, he might have been taken aback by the question or had some kind of Alzheimer's moment. Maybe he had to think back and remember every girl he came onto and if they (in his mind) wanted to **** him.

I view him as more likely delusional and mentally unstable than a mentally stable liar. I'm honestly not sure which one is worse or if one is actually worse than the other. That matter may be purely academic when it comes to the decisions he makes and their impact.
02-06-2017 , 05:16 PM

Maybe FOX can trade an apology for a SB ring.
02-06-2017 , 05:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
Donald Trump is like a 3 year old in that he cannot tell the difference between truth and fiction. Thus he is incapable of lying.

He makes delusional statements that he genuinely believes to be true which is why he is able to say what he says with a straight face. Deceit requires mens rea. Trump doesn't have that when he talks because he actually thinks he's telling the truth.
You are delusional
02-06-2017 , 05:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
I don't think you can fairly call Trump a liar. Being a liar assumes that you know the truth but go against it anyway. To me Trump doesn't have the mental capacity to distinguish truth from fiction which would make lying impossible.

Liars lie because it serves a selfish purpose. But Trump makes foolish statements even when it isn't in his best interests. He just says what makes him feel good. That's not the hallmark of a liar. It's a hallmark of a mental patient.
in some instances ofc you are correct.

but he also flat out lies and knows hes doing all the effin time too.
02-06-2017 , 05:20 PM
All these things that baffle you guys can be explained by his narcissistic personality disorder. He is a textbook case.
02-06-2017 , 05:27 PM
LordJVK's opposition strategy is the worst.
02-06-2017 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
All these things that baffle you guys can be explained by his narcissistic personality disorder. He is a textbook case.
+1. This is why the allegations of 4D chess are wrong, and the allegations that he is knowingly lying are sort of missing the point. His lies are compulsive in the literal sense, because narcissists must perpetuate a certain perception of themselves.
02-06-2017 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NxtWrldChamp
He did say that.

Here is the quote
"All over Europe, it's happening," Trump said. "It's gotten to a point where it's not even being reported. And in many cases, the very, very dishonest press doesn't want to report it. They have their reasons and you understand that."
The hilarious irony here is that there are actually fewer terrorist victims now than there were in like the 70s in Europe, but people erroneously believe that there are MORE now because the 24-hour media sensationalizes the **** out of them.

02-06-2017 , 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kukraprout
That guy is arguing that liberals should use the same tactics that Bannon (allegedly) uses and try to convince Trumpkins with peer-reviewed articles. Yeah, let's keep arguing with him like he's serious!
O/U on the % of Trumpkins who know what "peer-reviewed" means? 5%?
02-06-2017 , 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
O/U on the % of Trumpkins who know what "peer-reviewed" means? 5%?
Snap take the under.
02-06-2017 , 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autocratic
+1. This is why the allegations of 4D chess are wrong, and the allegations that he is knowingly lying are sort of missing the point. His lies are compulsive in the literal sense, because narcissists must perpetuate a certain perception of themselves.
This is a good article that makes me question how much of a buffoon Trump really is, or if his buffoonery is being played expertly by Bannon to provide cover: https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/...n-munich-post/

Quote:
After the 1923 fiasco, Hitler served nine months of a five-year sentence for rebellion and pledged to stay out of politics. But his parliamentary party didn’t quit, and eventually Hitler had demonstrated enough neutral behavior (discounting the murders committed by the Nazi death squads not directly connected to him) that he was allowed to campaign again. Was it a mistake? Had he learned a lesson? As it turned out, Hitler used the tactics of bluff masterfully, at times giving the impression of being a feckless Chaplinesque clown, at other times a sleeping serpent, at others yet a trustworthy statesman. The Weimar establishment didn’t know what to do, so they pretended this was normal. They “normalized” him.

And so they allowed him and his party back onto the electoral lists, the beginning of the end. Democracy destroying itself democratically. By November 1932, his party had become the largest faction in the Reichstag, though not a majority. After that election though, it looked as if he’d passed his peak: his total vote had gone down. It looked like the right-wing parties had been savvy in bringing him in and “normalizing” him, making him a figurehead for their own advancement.

Instead, it was truly the stupidest move made in world politics within the memory of mankind. It took only a few months for the hopes of normalization to be crushed. As Sir Richard Evans, the leading British historian of the period has proven at painstaking length, the Reichstag Fire was not a Hitler plan to excuse a takeover through martial law. It had indeed been the work of a Dutch man, Marinus van der Lubbe. But Hitler, ruthlessly and savagely, took advantage of it, instituting martial law and crushing electoral democracy. There would have been another excuse. Once in power Hitler was going to go on maximizing it until the “final solution.”
And the happy ending:

Quote:
I had to search another Munich archive to find the very final issues of the Munich Post, but they were even more dispiriting than I could imagine. The paper went down fighting a lie, fighting Nazi murderers, refusing to normalize the Hitler regime.

A week after Hitler came to power on January 30, 1933, the Munich Post published their regular murder survey under the headline “Nazi Party Hands Dripping with Blood,” enumerating the bloody casualties: 18 dead, 34 wounded in street battles with the SA Stormtroopers.

These are the headlines that followed in daily succession:

“Germany Under the Hitler Regime: Political Murder and Terror”
“Blood Guilt of the Nazi Party”
“Germany Today: No Day Without Death”
“Brutal Terror in the Streets of Munich”
“Outlaws and Murderers in Power”
“People Allow Themselves to Be Intimidated”

The era of normalization had begun everywhere else, but the Munich Post resisted.

The Munich Post lost, yes. Soon their office was closed. Some of the journalists ended up in Dachau, some “disappeared.” But they’d won a victory for truth. A victory over normalization. They never stopped fighting the lies, big and small, and left a record of defiance that was heroic and inspirational. They discovered the truth about “endlösung” before most could have even imagined it. The truth is always worth knowing. Support your local journalist.
How many of today's journalists would stand their ground in a similar spot?
02-06-2017 , 05:53 PM
Go watch his interview where he talks himself into saying women who get abortions should be put in jail. You won't think he's a jedi master after that.

02-06-2017 , 05:54 PM
It's probably under 10 for gen pop. Don't think knowledge (even cursory) of the peer review process is any kind of indicator of intelligence.

ETA: Errr, except in the sense that it's correlated to possession of a higher ed degree.
02-06-2017 , 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Where in the audio is it stated? I'm not wasting 13 minutes.
In general Bannon funding "respectable" research and shopping it around to mainstream press is true, but overblown.
02-06-2017 , 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
The hilarious irony here is that there are actually fewer terrorist victims now than there were in like the 70s in Europe, but people erroneously believe that there are MORE now because the 24-hour media sensationalizes the **** out of them.
I think it's less about media coverage and more about the ethnicity of the terrorists. IRA, ETA, etc. were frequently painted as heroes in some circles. You could openly raise funds for them in polite society.
02-06-2017 , 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
This is a good article that makes me question how much of a buffoon Trump really is, or if his buffoonery is being played expertly by Bannon to provide cover: https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/...n-munich-post/
The thing is that narcissists are good at this sort of thing as a general rule. That is, they are good at manipulating the people around them into seeing the world through their preferred lens. Trump isn't "trying" to do anything strategic per se, but he's using the same manipulative tactics that would work better on an interpersonal level. In national politics the narrative is harder to control. What you are seeing is not him masterfully manipulating that narrative. It's him struggling to control it when people are able to shine a light on his dishonesty.

Narcissists are always surprisingly effective at manipulation from the perspective of those who are aware of the truth. I think I've said this before in so many words, but Trump has basically stumbled unwittingly into a narcissist's nightmare. He is in one of the few positions on Earth where people are both eager and able to pull back the veil, and his ability to control it is minimal. All of his lies and shenanigans stem from that reality.
02-06-2017 , 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
Donald Trump is like a 3 year old in that he cannot tell the difference between truth and fiction. Thus he is incapable of lying.

He makes delusional statements that he genuinely believes to be true which is why he is able to say what he says with a straight face. Deceit requires mens rea. Trump doesn't have that when he talks because he actually thinks he's telling the truth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
Actually, it does.

Trump is saying things that are not true. Think of like a 3-4 year old. They say things all the time that are incorrect. But they are unaware that what they are saying is not true. But you as an adult wouldn't think the 3 year old is lying. You understand that they are incapable of knowing what the truth is.

With Trump, it's basically accommodation/assimilation.

A 3 year old sees a dog and says "Doggie!" The parent says "Very good!" Then the kid sees a horse and says "Doggie!"The parent says, "No, that's a horsie!" The kid says "Horsie!" and the parent says "Very good!"

You wouldn't say the kid is lying. He just doesn't know.

Now try it with Trump. Pretty ****ing scary when you think about it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
Trump absolutely knows he is lying. He's just a narcissist who has very low self-esteem.
All these contradictions melt into air once you fully embrace the power of bull****:

Quote:
Trump doesn't deal much in lies per se. Trump deals in bull****. I'm turning into a broken record on the subject to some extent, but one more time: Trump deals in claim-like constructions which are not properly captured by the dichotomy of 'true' and 'false'. Not to say that in their resemblance to claims, the things he says don't frequently fail to correspond with reality - of course they do - but that's not the point.

You can see it live in his supporters on this forum, even. Probably the best example is DS' swastika thread. Some guy wanders in yelling BLATANTLY OBVIOUS FALSE FLAG etc. Only later does he realise, because I guess he didn't bother reading the OP at first, that it's a personal account of a thing that happened to DS, rather than DS sharing some news story about a thing that happened to some stranger. And the guy apologises. Says he didn't realise, goodness me it just wasn't appropriate. Had I known it had happened to YOU good sir, I should never have deployed my knee-jerk conspiraderp arglebargle.

The key to understanding it is that at no point did that guy sincerely believe "It was a false flag". Nor was he properly lying about believing that. That utterance simply has a shape appropriate to negating the implications, as he saw them, of DS' OP. Everything is emotive, everything is "Boo" and "Hurray".
02-06-2017 , 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
I don't think they support Trump though?
If you are looking for a smart, reasonable conservative who also supports DJT, you're gonna have a bad time.
02-06-2017 , 06:08 PM
to think bill oreilly turning against trump might be america's only path to fight deplorables
02-06-2017 , 06:11 PM
Nah, Bill will fall in line. He just got a little extemporaneous there.
02-06-2017 , 06:13 PM
didnt say he wouldnt

fox news people actually becoming honest journalists is the one thing that would end Trump's sanity and his cult.

If they turned against him his whole fake news claims (about everyone else) would fall apart.

*but I guess theyd only turn against him when they know he's done, so they're useless.

Last edited by Kirbynator; 02-06-2017 at 06:19 PM.

      
m