Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

07-21-2017 , 12:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Rosenstein isn't a hardcore Trumpkin. Check out that NYT interview yesterday where Trump refers to him as some dubious guy from Baltimore.
Trump Made Several Misleading Claims in Times Interview
Mr. Trump suggested that Mr. Rosenstein was from Baltimore and might have Democratic leanings because “there are very few Republicans in Baltimore, if any.” But Mr. Rosenstein grew up in Philadelphia and attended the University of Pennsylvania, Mr. Trump’s alma mater. He was appointed the United States attorney for Maryland, based in Baltimore, in 2005 by President George W. Bush, a Republican.
Donald just can't wrap his pea brain around someone pledging loyalty to some silly constitution rather than to his traitorous ass
07-21-2017 , 12:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplicitus
Two words: book deal.

I had seen six months in the administration mentioned as "good enough". He probably hung on to a **** job an extra three months to maximize value.
His fee would be enormous. Do it, Spicey!

I'd even settle for a tell all with the Times.
07-21-2017 , 12:21 PM
I guarantee he signed a big fat NDA
07-21-2017 , 12:22 PM
If Sessions is fired/resigns while the senate is in recess, and Trump makes a recess appointment to replace him, can that guy fire Mueller? Or does it still have to be Rosenstein?
07-21-2017 , 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdidd
I guarantee he signed a big fat NDA
And I guarantee it's illegal and unenforceable and that the publisher will contractually agree to defend any suit at its own expense.
07-21-2017 , 12:24 PM
Glad to see that scumbag go.
07-21-2017 , 12:24 PM
It's a long read that's more specific than the generalities we already know. Trump lost a ton of money and was in debt and then a lot of Russian money from dubious sources kept him afloat, offered him pretty sweet real estate deals, and he has a few shady connections with Russian mobsters that he can't seem to recall now

https://newrepublic.com/article/1435...rime-syndicate
07-21-2017 , 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
spicy's out
Quote:
Originally Posted by epcfast
Spicer has "quit"
RIP Spiceboy you will always be a hard man in a bush.
07-21-2017 , 12:30 PM
I will buy ten copies of Spiceys book if he spills the dirt
07-21-2017 , 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigt2k4
There's probably not many Republican people to choose from for Rosenstein's role, and many would be more dedicated to their work than partisanship. Someone close to Trump probably recommended him thinking Trump didn't actually have a lot to hide.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pwn_Master
Rosenstein's position had to be confirmed by the Senate and he was on the slightly less horribad Republican's list of guys who could sail through easily and provide a veneer of credibility to the Justice Department. Trump probably had little idea who he was or the importance role he was being appointed to and said sure go ahead, I've got my boy Sessions as AG and that is all I need to know.
I guess the pool of racist Trumpkin attorneys was not what I thought it would be. I figured that it was small, but not that small. I would have guessed there exist enough Sessions-type guys out there that he could have filled all the upper levels of the Justice Department.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Rosenstein isn't a hardcore Trumpkin. Check out that NYT interview yesterday where Trump refers to him as some dubious guy from Baltimore.
Trump's opinion now is obviously going to be different from what it was at the time he decided to appoint him. Obviously the guys vetting him ****ed up (from Trump's point of view).
07-21-2017 , 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplicitus
And I guarantee it's illegal and unenforceable and that the publisher will contractually agree to defend any suit at its own expense.
I hope you're right
07-21-2017 , 12:32 PM
Gotta admit Russia is GOAT for dumping a bunch of money into a a guy who was basically a devolving conman, and ending up with a hold on the POTUS. They must have really taken that Black Swan book to heart.
07-21-2017 , 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
I will buy ten copies of Spiceys book if he spills the dirt
I'll raise you, buy and gift a copy to every person I know that voted Trump
07-21-2017 , 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
RIP Spiceboy you will always be a hard man in a bush.
A-****ing-mong a bush!
07-21-2017 , 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
This is obviously the correct answer. Which is why I've been banging the "waste of Democrats time to focus too much on this" because you're either having to thread a very, very precisely needle to really drive Trump out of power and penalize the GOP; failing that, everyone decamps for partisan corners, perhaps some damage but nothing lasting.

The better issues are ones that are personal to people and threaten their livelihoods and well being. That's health care, not Trump scandals up to and including Russia.
My better soul hopes that treason (or something pretty damned close to it) will motivate the electorate that this thing might just be important.

Then again, the big problem is that democrats are utterly worthless in crafting an appropriate message that resonates.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
As a practical matter, I doubt that leaks will add much to the equation if Trump fires Mueller. For starters, I'm not convinced that Mueller or others on his team would leak a bunch of information to the press. And even if they did, the leaks would largely consist of Mueller or others on his team describing what the evidence seemed to show or what their findings might have been. That will be easy enough for many GOP supporters to wave away. It's very unlikely imo that anyone on Mueller's team would ship hard drives full of documents to the WaPo.
Given the structure of the team he's put together (to my limited knowledge here), these are old-school lockdown guys who don't leak. I doubt Mueller would have it any other way. They're "no commenting" to the NYT and WaPo on even tangential and fairly trivial matters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by simplicitus
We're playing this game in beginner mode, when Dvault and others are worried about what it would be like on hard mode. He's not the gopher from Caddy Shack--he's just a regular dumb gopher. Put some cheese in a trap and he'll snatch at it and get caught, easy peasy.
A bit slow-pony but I DON'T CARE.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Melkerson
Can someone explain to me why Rosenstein appointed Mueller in the first place? If Trump appointed him, then I think it's reasonable to assume he was a Trumpkin. Why would a Trumpkin pick someone who was going to go HAM on Trump?
Rosenstein is not a Trumpkin; he threatened to resign when Trump pulled the "Rod told me to fire Comey" line.

WaPo article:
Quote:
Robert S. Mueller III, a former prosecutor who served as the FBI director from 2001 to 2013, has agreed to take over the investigation as a special counsel, Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein announced. The move marks a concession by the Trump administration to Democratic demands for the investigation to be run independently of the Justice Department. Calls for a special counsel intensified after Trump fired FBI Director James B. Comey last week.


“In my capacity as acting attorney general I determined that it is in the public interest for me to exercise my authority and appoint a special counsel to assume responsibility for this matter,’’ Rosenstein said in a statement. “My decision is not a finding that crimes have been committed or that any prosecution is warranted. I have made no such determination. What I have determined is that based upon the unique circumstances the public interest requires me to place this investigation under the authority of a person who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command.”
Finally, there should be no uncertainty that Mueller is essentially apolitical. He actually was a possibility for FBI Director after Comey was fired.
07-21-2017 , 12:36 PM
WH is going crazy ATM. Bannon screaming Scaramucci gets the job over his dead body lol.
07-21-2017 , 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
Scaramucci is a huge piece of ****, but still hard to see how this was the final straw for the Spice Man.
Is there some sort of history between Spicey and Scaramucci? Why does Spicey dislike him?
07-21-2017 , 12:39 PM
How the F are we gonna come up with a nickname for Anthony Scaramucci? All is lost.
07-21-2017 , 12:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoltan
Finally, there should be no uncertainty that Mueller is essentially apolitical. He actually was a possibility for FBI Director after Comey was fired.
He was interviewed by Trump and Sessions the DAY BEFORE he got appointed a Special Counsel. And Trump is trying to paint his support for Mueller's integrity as a conflict of interest. Cra Cra.
07-21-2017 , 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
How the F are we gonna come up with a nickname for Anthony Scaramucci? All is lost.
The Scarecrow.
07-21-2017 , 12:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
WH is going crazy ATM. Bannon screaming Scaramucci gets the job over his dead body lol.
Where are you hearing this?
07-21-2017 , 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatkid
How the F are we gonna come up with a nickname for Anthony Scaramucci? All is lost.
Article says friends call him The Mooch
07-21-2017 , 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Where are you hearing this?
MSNBC. Hallie Jackson is there for the briefing. One source inside the house, one source outside the house.
07-21-2017 , 12:44 PM
Why wait for the book? Maybe one of the committees can invite him to testify.
07-21-2017 , 12:45 PM

      
m