garyfelice55/jumpalot containment thread - better late than never - Page 13 - Beginning Poker Questions

Two Plus Two Forums Poker Strategy Beginners and General Questions

garyfelice55/jumpalot containment thread - better late than never

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 13 of 15

First

3 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Last

Page 13 of 15

First

3 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Last

05-12-2016 , 10:56 AM

#301

wacker1913

self-banned

Join Date: Sep 2014 Posts: 1,915

Quote:

Originally Posted by garyfelice55

Yea That makes a lot of sense.
I am wondering how many of the "experts" who respond to questions here
even have a positive BB/100.
I am gonna guess probably less then 20% of them.

I think you are the best poker player in this forum

Quote

05-12-2016 , 12:05 PM

#302

King Spew

Just average

Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 15,792

Quote:

Originally Posted by garyfelice55

I am wondering how many of the "experts" who respond to questions here
even have a positive BB/100.

This seems to be a good time for you to move out of the Beginners Question area of 2+2. Try to find a place where they will respect your praises.

Quote

05-12-2016 , 02:12 PM

#303

otatop

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 12,721

Quote:

Originally Posted by garyfelice55

Yea That makes a lot of sense.
I am wondering how many of the "experts" who respond to questions here
even have a positive BB/100.
I am gonna guess probably less then 20% of them.

For as much as you dislike the posters and responses you get in this forum, you sure do ask a lot of questions.

Quote

05-12-2016 , 05:20 PM

#304

Kelvis

banned

Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 8,737

Quote:

Originally Posted by garyfelice55

Yea That makes a lot of sense.
I am wondering how many of the "experts" who respond to questions here
even have a positive BB/100.
I am gonna guess probably less then 20% of them.

I tried reading your post but I almost died from boredom. So instead here is a picture of the Teletubbies.

Spoiler:

Quote

05-12-2016 , 06:56 PM

#305

Bob148

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 12,073

Quote:

Originally Posted by garyfelice55

The Question then becomes is that a meaningful stat that translates into a team that will win more often then not.

In that case, no it's not a useful stat. You can have the best starting pitching in the world, but if your relievers suck then you're gonna end up blowing leads all the time. You might even have the lead for 8 innings on average, but if you always blow the lead in the ninth, you're screwed.

Quote

05-12-2016 , 07:08 PM

#306

denks

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 7,032

Confirmed thread has contracted blueboyaids

Quote

05-12-2016 , 07:12 PM

#307

squid face

ChatThreadPrez

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 11,730

Quote:

Originally Posted by garyfelice55

Yea That makes a lot of sense.
I am wondering how many of the "experts" who respond to questions here
even have a positive BB/100.
I am gonna guess probably less then 20% of them.

trolling skillz need some work

Quote

05-12-2016 , 07:21 PM

#308

AlienSpaceBat

table tilting animal

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 9,703

I'm merging this thread into the containment thread.

OP - don't create any more threads in BQ without prior approval from a BQ mod.

Quote

05-12-2016 , 08:13 PM

#309

TheDefiniteArticle

Indecisive

Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 14,125

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienSpaceBat

I'm merging this thread into the containment thread.

OP - don't create any more threads in BQ without prior approval from a BQ mod.

didn't you say you'd ban him last time?

Quote

05-12-2016 , 10:23 PM

#310

Cfoye

adept

Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 922

18% is 4.5-1 not 5.5-1. Flush draw on turn is about 4.22-1.

Quote

05-12-2016 , 10:28 PM

#311

King Spew

Just average

Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 15,792

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDefiniteArticle

didn't you say you'd ban him last time?

Then it becomes a game of Whack-A-Troll.

As a former mod....never a good result. You really hope that OP "gets it" and become a productive 2+2 poster.

Quote

05-13-2016 , 07:41 PM

#312

venice10

Referee

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 26,103

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDefiniteArticle

didn't you say you'd ban him last time?

Not my call in this forum, but I would say that Gary has modified his behavior enough to avoid being banned. If you are coming into this thread, you have no cause for complaint about him at this time.

Quote

05-16-2016 , 05:40 PM

#313

Evoxgsr96

self-banned

Join Date: Oct 2014 Posts: 2,137

Jolly good show Gary.

Seriously im laughing my butt off

Quote

05-30-2016 , 09:01 PM

#314

garyfelice55

banned

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 343

If I know I am making $ 13 a hour I am thinking that about 33 hands per hour is 100 hands.
Then three hours worth of play (same as 100 hands = 39 dollars)
IF
The structure of the game is 1/3 and NOT 1/2
my BB/100 would be 39 divided by 3 = 13 BB/100.
IF the structure were
1/2 the BB/100 would then be 19 and fractions.
Did I get that Right ?

Quote

05-30-2016 , 09:09 PM

#315

otatop

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 12,721

Didn't you already start a thread for this?

Anyway, I'll just paste my answer from that thread into this one:

Quote:

Originally Posted by otatop

The bb/100 formula is:
(winnings/bb)/(no of hands/100) (credit to this post)

($13/3)/(33/100)= 13.13 bb/100
($13/2)/(33/100)= 19.69 bb/100

So yes, you're correct.

Quote

05-30-2016 , 09:44 PM

#316

garyfelice55

banned

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 343

Quote:

Originally Posted by otatop

Didn't you already start a thread for this?

Anyway, I'll just paste my answer from that thread into this one:

($13/3)/(33/100)= 13.13 bb/100
($13/2)/(33/100)= 19.69 bb/100

So yes, you're correct.

ok thanks

Quote

05-30-2016 , 09:55 PM

#317

ArtyMcFly

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2014 Posts: 13,256

Off topic, but it's only just dawned on me just how sloooooww live poker must feel. To have to sit there for 3 hours (or more) to get dealt just 100 hands sounds like purgatory. /derail

Quote

05-30-2016 , 10:03 PM

#318

garyfelice55

banned

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 343

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArtyMcFly

Off topic, but it's only just dawned on me just how sloooooww live poker must feel. To have to sit there for 3 hours (or more) to get dealt just 100 hands sounds like purgatory. /derail

You're probably playing 2 and 3 games at a time and I would bet you're also facing players that aren't as soft.

Quote

05-30-2016 , 11:26 PM

#319

tiltninja

veteran

Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 2,937

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArtyMcFly

Off topic, but it's only just dawned on me just how sloooooww live poker must feel. To have to sit there for 3 hours (or more) to get dealt just 100 hands sounds like purgatory. /derail

also think about how well you can play with the extra time. when you're bored you can watch all the hands being played! you can even talk to people and have fun!

Quote

05-30-2016 , 11:33 PM

#320

WereBeer

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 10,776

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArtyMcFly

Off topic, but it's only just dawned on me just how sloooooww live poker must feel. To have to sit there for 3 hours (or more) to get dealt just 100 hands sounds like purgatory. /derail

This is exactly the aspect that prevents live games being flooded by online nitreg autists. So I consider it a huge benefit, albeit well disguised.

Quote

05-31-2016 , 01:31 AM

#321

squid face

ChatThreadPrez

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 11,730

there are ZERO live pros that I know that measure win in bb/100

we measure in in terms of $/hr

Quote

05-31-2016 , 02:44 PM

#322

garyfelice55

banned

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 343

Quote:

Originally Posted by squid face

there are ZERO live pros that I know that measure win in bb/100

we measure in in terms of $/hr

so what number is good and what number is crushing it ?
I guess it needs to be considered the level it is vs.
Since most of the world talks in BB/100
I am guessing over 14 is a crush and anything over 25 is either unattainable
and/or unrealistic.
I wonder how many players are Negative bb/100 (probably around 92% ?)

Quote

05-31-2016 , 04:59 PM

#323

squid face

ChatThreadPrez

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 11,730

I used to play on line prior to BF I spoke in terms of BB/100 back then. In live poker we speak either $/hr or bb/hr

at the 2/5 level I consider a crusher someone who wins 10bb+/hr (50 bux+ per hour)

solid grinders win at 30-35/hr (6-7bb/hr) at 2/5 imho

I only know of 1 long term crusher at the 1/2 level and that is wj94 and he absolutely obliterates the vegas 1/2 scene

Dream crusher personally knows multiple 1/2 and 1/3 grinders that do quite well

Quote

05-31-2016 , 06:11 PM

#324

ITT666

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 3,663

At $1/$2 $13/hour (6.5 bb's/hour) is a fine win rate. It's not crushing, but it's solid enough.

At $1/$3 $13/hour (4.33bb's/hour) is an ok win rate in the sense that you are profitable. I doubt anyone with this winrate is making huge mistakes frequently, but they are surely making mistakes. Could be they spew off due to tilt every now and again, or they are making some smaller fundamental mistakes.

Quote

06-01-2016 , 10:24 AM

#325

garyfelice55

banned

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 343

IS there a good way to improve play from specific positions ?
As an example after looking at all my stats
I am a pretty strong player from both the cut off and button I am just ok in small blind and I am getting slammed when in the Big Blind.
what is the best way to improve my play from the big blind

Quote

Page 13 of 15

First

3 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 13 of 15

First

3 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Last