Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2?

08-23-2021 , 11:50 AM
We need to clear this Canadian thing up. I personally have lived in 7 Canadian cities over the years and it is important that every one understands this:

Spoiler:
All Canadians look like this:


This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-23-2021 , 12:41 PM
All the Canadians I know talk real funny.

Spoiler:
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-23-2021 , 03:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Fish
Jair Bolsonaro confirmed new owner of 2+2.
That would be incredible. Then we would have him ranting in random threads about how reporting posts is for ***** (I do not condone this statement or the sentiment)
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-23-2021 , 06:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by R*R
We need to clear this Canadian thing up. I personally have lived in 7 Canadian cities over the years and it is important that every one understands this:

Take off ya hoser.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-23-2021 , 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerPlayingGamble
Take off eh, ya hoser.
FYP.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-23-2021 , 09:40 PM
Does any1 still have any respect for Mason at all now knowing the lengths he went to & is still trying to go to defending the wierdo creep PEDO that is 1 David Skalansky

As they both have tried to say "well enery1 knew about it all" just imagine what we don't know...
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-23-2021 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by YaBoyINthe604
Does any1 still have any respect for Mason at all now knowing the lengths he went to & is still trying to go to defending the wierdo creep PEDO that is 1 David Skalansky

As they both have tried to say "well enery1 knew about it all" just imagine what we don't know...
What age was the girl? From my understanding, she was 16. In NV, 16 is the age of consent, and it doesn't matter what age the other person is. It's creepy, but no laws were broken. After looking it up, I'm surprised to see that 2/3 of states are actually 16 (though some have Romeo and Juliet provisions for that age).
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 03:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Land O Lakes
What age was the girl? From my understanding, she was 16. In NV, 16 is the age of consent, and it doesn't matter what age the other person is. It's creepy, but no laws were broken. After looking it up, I'm surprised to see that 2/3 of states are actually 16 (though some have Romeo and Juliet provisions for that age).
No dude just no stop trying to justify this you creep!
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 04:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by YaBoyINthe604
No dude just no stop trying to justify this you creep!
Quoted for truth.

I'm glad this thread is steering back toward the topic that was the true draw. Let's keep this dumpster fire ablaze.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 04:01 AM
you act like sklansky hasn't been with hundreds or even thousands of women. it's not a far cry to assess this sample of 1 to be an anomaly.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 05:40 AM
When I read Sklansky’s Theory of Poker it blew my freaking mind!
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 07:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by YaBoyINthe604
Does any1 still have any respect for Mason at all now knowing the lengths he went to & is still trying to go to defending the wierdo creep PEDO that is 1 David Skalansky

As they both have tried to say "well enery1 knew about it all" just imagine what we don't know...
Do you have no idea what a pedophile actually is? Because this ain't it.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 08:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuma
you act like sklansky hasn't been with hundreds or even thousands of women. it's not a far cry to assess this sample of 1 to be an anomaly.
Exactly. Just like murderers meet hundreds or even thousands of people they don't murder.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 08:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by YaBoyINthe604
No dude just no stop trying to justify this you creep!
Pointing out that he broke no laws is not justifying anything. Since no laws were broken, it's all a personal opinion. I already stated what my personal opinion is, but apparently you missed it.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 09:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Land O Lakes
Pointing out that he broke no laws is not justifying anything. Since no laws were broken, it's all a personal opinion. I already stated what my personal opinion is, but apparently you missed it.
except quite literally several laws when he pushed someone to suicide during the ordeal
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 09:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theporkchop
except quite literally several laws when he pushed someone to suicide during the ordeal
That's a separate incident with a different person and isn't the current subject of the thread. I'm sure David has broken traffic laws as well, but I wasn't including those either when I said he broke no laws.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 10:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theporkchop
except quite literally several laws when he pushed someone to suicide during the ordeal
if someone were determined to make a website about my mother i might be compelled to chuck a brick through their bedroom window. that would be terrible on it's own. but i don't fault David for writing a maniacal letter to anyone that was trying to hurt his wife.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 10:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Land O Lakes
That's a separate incident with a different person and isn't the current subject of the thread. I'm sure David has broken traffic laws as well, but I wasn't including those either when I said he broke no laws.
Now I'm confused, because I thought we were talking about a sample of 1?
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 10:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuma
if someone were determined to make a website about my mother i might be compelled to chuck a brick through their bedroom window. that would be terrible on it's own. but i don't fault David for writing a maniacal letter to anyone that was trying to hurt his wife.
I don't know all the details of Brandi and her hustle, but David's OG style email is a perfect example of why the common advice is to let an incendiary email sit for a day or two and then reread it before deciding to send it. If he did that, then he should have waited longer, lol.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgiggity
Now I'm confused, because I thought we were talking about a sample of 1?
Sample of what? Brandi was like 25 or 26.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 11:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Land O Lakes
That's a separate incident with a different person and isn't the current subject of the thread. I'm sure David has broken traffic laws as well, but I wasn't including those either when I said he broke no laws.
except the bad act in question is the root of the crime

also by definition he couldve been charged for the situation under

18 USCS § 2422
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theporkchop
except the bad act in question is the root of the crime
Root of what crime?

Quote:
Originally Posted by theporkchop
also by definition he couldve been charged for the situation under

18 USCS § 2422
I am not a lawyer and I have no idea if David influenced her to cross state lines, but the statue you quote doesn't seem relevant because the sexual activity was legal for any person.

"to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense"
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Land O Lakes
Root of what crime?



I am not a lawyer and I have no idea if David influenced her to cross state lines, but the statue you quote doesn't seem relevant because the sexual activity was legal for any person.

"to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense"
note the key words

can be charged

he could've been charged under the argument she(any of them) were unable to consent especially in the main case when autism is thrown in the mix

would he be found guilty id lean no but it would depend on the area of the spectrum.

but even at not guilty he then would in fact be guilty of the crime previously mentioned because again it just needs the can be charged not found guilty
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 11:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theporkchop
note the key words

can be charged

he could've been charged under the argument she(any of them) were unable to consent especially in the main case when autism is thrown in the mix

would he be found guilty id lean no but it would depend on the area of the spectrum.

but even at not guilty he then would in fact be guilty of the crime previously mentioned because again it just needs the can be charged not found guilty
You can't take "can be charged" out of context and make it something it is not. It reads, "sex for which any person could be charged."

That means that if any other person could be charged for having sex with that person, then the person who coerced this person to cross state lines would have an additional charge.

That means if she came to NV to meet David and randomly banged some other 50yo she met at the supermarket and that 50yo can't be charged with a crime, then David can't be charged with coercion.
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote
08-24-2021 , 11:51 AM
it doesnt say any other it says any and by letter of the law(i should know i passed the bar) it counts


either way he's a slimeball so let's get this thread back on topic with more Jair Bolsonaro
This website has been purchased by us. What is the future of 2+2? Quote

      
m