Hi Everyone:

I need to come back to this post. There is nothing in the purchasing agreement like this. In fact, there is nothing relative to banning or unbanning anyone.

Perhaps PTLou thinks he was being funny. But what he posted is false.

Mason

Mason do you ever feel like you're business partners with Jared from subway?

I'm so proud.

No.

MM

Now that Mason is a "normal" user, are his post signatures still kosher?

You sound like you have some experience with this sort of thing. Ket's hope it's because you're a pharmacist

No, man. I’m pretty sure he’s American. Or from one of those island nations that people like to cruise to.

Okay, now you've gone too far.

F@&! this guy.

NO ONE says that word around me and lives to tell about it.

It was all fun and games and then you had to toss out the "i" word.
And it's not even a word!

I'm done. I'm out.
I thought we all had some respect for decency here, but now . . . just no.

Irregardless of what you may think, it actually is a word. I'll let my boys Merriam and Webster elaborate:

What you posted is ABSOLUTELY false. I know this for a fact and can prove it.

That's

You forgot to post this part of it:

That said, the bigger lesson from that paragraph, which keeps getting butchered in this thread, is punctuation goes inside of quotation marks - e.g., "slang," or "slang."

Not in "the UK", unless the entire sentence is a "quotation".

Dylan, 80, is accused by an anonymised woman, JC, of establishing “an emotional connection” with her to “lower her inhibitions with the object of sexually abusing her, which he did, coupled with the provision of drugs, alcohol and threats of physical violence, leaving her emotionally scarred and psychologically damaged to this day”.

“Prof Green estimated that if less than 0.8% of cattle carcasses had diclofenac it can cause this kind of crash,” Prakash says. “We sampled carcasses over 2,000 locations and found more than 11% had diclofenac.”

It said: “The Queen’s ‘recollections may vary’ comment ‘did not go unnoticed’ by the couple, who a close source said were ‘not surprised’ that full ownership was not taken. ‘Months later and little accountability has been taken’, a pal of Meghan added. ‘How can you move forward with that?”’

USA#1

What a fascinating thread.

I never knew this, thanks for sharing.

Finally, some meat and 'tators in this thread. Let's see it.

Wouldn't irregardless be a double negative and therefore mean regard?

Merriam-Webster defines irregardless as "nonstandard" but meaning the same as "regardless." "Many people find irregardless to be a nonsensical word, as the ir- prefix usually functions to indicates negation; however, in this case it appears to function as an intensifier

Irregardless, it is not proper English.

Why? Why did so many people decide to destroy this thread???

Consider it a social experiment of what happens with a minimally moderated thread.

Thread was better when it was Hookers & Predators

I have no idea what the Purchase Agreement said, but I am curious as to your proof. What is it?

Deciding requires thought, there was probably little and more likely no thought involved in how their derailing posts would affect this thread.