Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Garrett Adelstein Report on Likely Cheating on Hustler Casino Live Garrett Adelstein Report on Likely Cheating on Hustler Casino Live

10-08-2022 , 04:24 AM
She literally makes that decision with the J4 hand. Did you watch the video?
10-08-2022 , 04:26 AM
Quote:
In a post from a now deleted Twitter account, on 9/11 Sagbigsal asks: "How do you cheat in chess? Serious question lol"

This potentially incriminating tweet could suggest Bryan wanted to learn how to relay hole card information using the same systems people use cheat in chess.
Go to bed man.
10-08-2022 , 04:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HexBreaker
If the story about the filing cabinet is true, that is both pretty convincing and damning for Nick and Ryan. "Oh, the degenerate gambler who monitors our stream moved his filing cabinet in front of the camera pointed at him. Well, whatever."
yes i too check regularly to see if my employees have moved any furniture to block the cameras
10-08-2022 , 04:34 AM
The HCL production team, Robbie’s associates and backers are a group of con-artists, ex-felons, and degenerates.

IMO based on this alone, even without the shady J4 hand, makes it so that there is at least a 10% chance that cheating on the show has been considered or attempted if it has not already happened.

How lucrative is it to run the HCL stream? Does the show bring in a million a year? Running the show to have a cheating ring on the side would make sense if the show itself barely brings in revenue
10-08-2022 , 04:37 AM
Robbi’s response to Garret’s ‘report’:

https://mobile.twitter.com/RobbiJade...59450545545216
10-08-2022 , 04:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Ranger
She literally makes that decision with the J4 hand. Did you watch the video?
not sure if this is directed at me, but actually, the theory is that no she doesn't make that decision, it's made for her lol
10-08-2022 , 04:39 AM
GARRETT IS A COMPLETE HO...gman saying baseless claims against dgaf means he's not cheating...yet he has baseless claims against Robbi and is adamant shes cheating...what a hypocritical b1 tch....g is such a douchebag chad and I've thought this well before any of this. Playing in soft LA games printing money and everyone rides this b1 tches d 1 ck
10-08-2022 , 04:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrdegen00
GARRETT IS A COMPLETE HO...gman saying baseless claims against dgaf means he's not cheating...yet he has baseless claims against Robbi and is adamant shes cheating...what a hypocritical b1 tch....g is such a douchebag chad and I've thought this well before any of this. Playing in soft LA games printing money and everyone rides this b1 tches d 1 ck
are you okay?
10-08-2022 , 04:42 AM
I was in a "10% cheating" camp before and even though there's zero evidence presented in OPs post and everything being just circumstantial (plus some wrong transcripts too)... I don't know, it still moved a needle a bit for me towards cheating. The whole situation is just so bizarre.
10-08-2022 , 04:43 AM
So they hire a guy with a bunch of prior arrests, who is also a degenerate gambler, give him real-time access to the cards in a game with millions of dollars on the table, and they allow him to move his desk into a corner where it isn't visible to cameras.

And OP isn't questioning the integrity of the game as a whole. Action is too good.
10-08-2022 , 04:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickhuman
Charles and Robbi have a Ace Rothstein/Ginger thing going on, and Rip is like Jimmy Woods...

Charles prolly knew they were banging but this all becoming public has to be very humiliating for him..

maybe Robbi will be able to play these games on her own when they divorce and she gets half of hubbies ethereum.
When Charles Lew came onto Joey's stream Charles started off full of fire, threatening legal action. But the moment Joey brought up the suggestion Robbi and Rip had a connection Charles suddenly had the wind taken out of his sails, he instantly changed, and started taking the approach that something may have happened involving card cheating that he wasnt aware of, his whole behaviour suddenly changed.

Just guessing, it maybe that she has previous in the side relationships that he knows about, so realised the Rip thing may be true, and that she could have colluded with Rip. Certainly since that interview he has been very low profile, whereas before he was high profile and threatening.
10-08-2022 , 04:48 AM
If I was a gambling man, ahem, excuse me, I would probably wanna wager on the outcome of this investigation.

The big questions are, how do you officiate such wager and where can I place my bets?
10-08-2022 , 05:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by travv0
what, it is a big decision for her because she's playing off of queues a certain cowboy hatter is giving her across the table. she has no idea that jack high is a hand you can't do anything with ever which is the source of a couple notable hands
If she is getting signals why did she call flop and turn and even get to the river drawing dead? Oops...
10-08-2022 , 05:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Ramjet
If she is getting signals why did she call flop and turn and even get to the river drawing dead? Oops...
It's quite plausible if the signal is binary, in which case a flush draw could reasonably continue because it doesn't know it's drawing dead, just that it's behind.
10-08-2022 , 05:32 AM
One short question can show that your argument is wrong.

The signal system you assume has two limitations.

First, the signal does not carry a hand.

Secondly, if the winning rate is closer to 50% than a certain level, it does not send a signal to inform that fact.

The AQ hand of RIP's and Robbi's can only be explained if these two assumptions are established.

So when Robbi calls J high, what's the signal that Robbi is getting?

The signal would not have been delivered. So what should a cheater do?

Cheater will use a time chip and wait till signal. But if there is no signal, the cheater will fold.

The Cheater can safely suck up all your chips when the Cheater's signal is operating normally.

Your argument strongly blocks the possibility that you have been victimized by fraud.

It reminds me pre-flop all-in with AA, and 2 callers have AA, QQ. When Q appears on the flop, fool who wants A to appear on the turn and the river.

Stop crying and find your composure.
10-08-2022 , 05:40 AM
As a side note, if Robbi has an identical twin, as she claimed, does that mean they go to the same plastic surgeon?
10-08-2022 , 05:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
It's quite plausible if the signal is binary, in which case a flush draw could reasonably continue because it doesn't know it's drawing dead, just that it's behind.
She had no flush draw on the flop and her opponent had trips. Why would they call flop ?
10-08-2022 , 06:01 AM
Wow, I can’t believe people still use 2+2.

Is rapini still here to ruin it for people? Guy literally ruined what was such a wonderful experience for me to the point where I have not been back in years. Heard from a number of other people that he was just as bad to them.
10-08-2022 , 06:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Ramjet
Problem is we are needing to go extreme cheating situations where not only does she have access to RFID data but knows the showdowns as well. The far far more likely explanation is she just did a standard fish play.

If your claim is she is so dumb to cheat in such an obvious spot like the J4, then there must be at least some other blatant cheating spots, because she is so dumb. They don't exist. What is your plausible explanation for this? because it seems the cheat crew are totally ignoring this.
Earlier in the week, you and others were claiming there was no way any cheating could happen. That because of stones/postle, streams would be better managed, etc etc.

And told everyone to show you how it would even be possible at all to cheat. They would need someone on the inside....etc etc. That you wouldn't listen to anything else until that could be shown.


.........well, now you have a shitbag working behind the scenes who has access to the equipment. So, now it has been show that security is nowhere near as good as it would need to be, and that having someone on the inside is extremely possible.

Yet, you have moved your goal post again when the information you demanded ha surfaced.




Further, through information posted via Nik Airball that coincidentally RIP told him he was putting himself and Robbi into the game. He was conveniently "drunk" when he agreed to go on the show and take her with him......that he was concerned he wouldn't be able to get the money quick enough.

Then, magically, when they went to the cage with Nik, the wire "hadn't come through" and he wouldn't be able to play. So Nik loaned him the money.




These tactics are extremely common among conmen. There's always some circumstance that comes up and puts them in a spot they need help out of. If Nik or someone doesn't lend the money, they just don't show up and/or disappear.


This single event in an of itself isn't a smoking gun. However, no one seems to be able to show any reasonable way that Rip can afford to stake himself and another player for $175k.



There are just too many "coincidences" popping up around a group of people who coincidentally are involved in possible cheating.
10-08-2022 , 06:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReliableSource
It’s all so convenient….oh we caught Bryan palming 15k..but we don’t show footage…and nobody will press charges…oh well

annnd…oh Bryan moved an office cabinet..totally obstructing our control room camera weeks ago….we didn’t think much of it.

annnnd….Bryan sounded really really mad when Robbi gave Garrett his money back

Fall guy.
Still there is people not seeing the trees. How in the hell do you learn about Bryans actions and somehow turn it into a crazy counter conspiracy? When do reality come into the equation?
10-08-2022 , 06:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daedaluss
This movie is going to be amazing. Two thieves called Rip & Robbi steal from the Hustler casino while the internet starts an investigation. It'll be a mix between Don't **** with cats, Ocean's Eleven and the Big Short. I say Doug Polk should be played by Edward Norton, Nik Airball by Tim Dillon and Joey Ingram by Theo Von.
dont forget Angelina Jolie as Robbi
10-08-2022 , 06:17 AM
LIVE CASH GOAT
10-08-2022 , 06:20 AM
Except for one thing: why would she ever give the money back....DNegs is right, scammers don't do that.

Also, why choose J4 as such an obviously suspicious call, and not that far ahead...Ax of clubs would be far less suspicious. Even amateurs can see how odd a call that is, and then to give the money back?

Makes zero sense.

Is there a connection between Robbi and the other guys: NO doubt. The more likely reason: boobs.
10-08-2022 , 06:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkBucks
Earlier in the week, you and others were claiming there was no way any cheating could happen. That because of stones/postle, streams would be better managed, etc etc.

And told everyone to show you how it would even be possible at all to cheat. They would need someone on the inside....etc etc. That you wouldn't listen to anything else until that could be shown.


.........well, now you have a shitbag working behind the scenes who has access to the equipment. So, now it has been show that security is nowhere near as good as it would need to be, and that having someone on the inside is extremely possible.

Yet, you have moved your goal post again when the information you demanded ha surfaced.




Further, through information posted via Nik Airball that coincidentally RIP told him he was putting himself and Robbi into the game. He was conveniently "drunk" when he agreed to go on the show and take her with him......that he was concerned he wouldn't be able to get the money quick enough.

Then, magically, when they went to the cage with Nik, the wire "hadn't come through" and he wouldn't be able to play. So Nik loaned him the money.




These tactics are extremely common among conmen. There's always some circumstance that comes up and puts them in a spot they need help out of. If Nik or someone doesn't lend the money, they just don't show up and/or disappear.


This single event in an of itself isn't a smoking gun. However, no one seems to be able to show any reasonable way that Rip can afford to stake himself and another player for $175k.



There are just too many "coincidences" popping up around a group of people who coincidentally are involved in possible cheating.
One dodgy person working behind the scenes does not mean cheating is possible. That is what security measures are for. You are just making a huge logical assumption. Nothing I said has been changed. I never claimed it was not possible there was no dodgy people behind the scenes. I said cheating is extremely hard and there is no genuine evidence of it.
10-08-2022 , 06:33 AM
If they were cheating then Robbi and Rip are like the best actors in the ****ing world. I'm sticking to aneurysm-call combined with ridiculous circumstances and happenstance with the thief

srs

What's the betting line at?

      
m