Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times?

02-10-2014 , 01:48 AM
Haxton and Negreanu just bought in multiple times to level opponents and NVG, and make final table of $250,000 Boutique Challenge
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 02:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by camz2895
Pretty surprised DN says it's his own money considering the common belief that PS puts him in most events
Maybe he hasn't heard?
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 02:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bukafax
Clearly you are a moron who does not pay attention. When that shocking hair transformation happened he thanked it to some peanut butter mix he created. As time goes on the hair has thickened and became more full in the front. The signs of hair transplant. When he was lying about that he came off as quite truthful even though everything is against that.

http://www.pokernews.com/video/ept10...-hair-8202.htm

Just grew like a chia pet....
This is your example of him lying? He made it so outrageous that nobody could possibly think he was being serious.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 02:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by poofinger
This is your example of him lying? He made it so outrageous that nobody could possibly think he was being serious.
Then what was the necessity for his demeanour and explanation? DN is a joker through and through and he shows it. Yet when he said this, no playfulness. He even went as far as to explain it.

Again like I said I wish I knew what EPT video it was, but he was on the final table and somebody was shocked by his hair. Again he gave the same story. You think he decided I am going to go around and tell this outrageous story nobody will believe to every person I come across? No.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 03:23 AM
if fabian doesnt do something sweet the germans are going to be down a few million in Australia.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 03:42 AM
I probably would pay more than a 10% markup for Seidel or Ivey shares in one these. However, I am not sure how that is relevant. Suppose Haxton sold 100% of himself in $250K MTTs at a 10% markup. Then he makes $25K with no risk for a couple days work.

Presumably they are expecting to profit on these buyins in the long run. Just like if you bought into a bunch of Sunday majors. It is basically the same thing, but at much higher stakes.

This is the nature of high stake games cash or tournament. Not sure why people are upset about it. Maybe they are jealous.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 04:03 AM
ivey and durrr playing prop games

Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 04:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KansasCT
here for the lol wcgrider
How'd he do?
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 04:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KansasCT
ivey and durrr playing prop games
Gamblers gonna gamble. Sitting on a 500k bubble obviously not enough action...
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 06:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by betgo
I probably would pay more than a 10% markup for Seidel or Ivey shares in one these. However, I am not sure how that is relevant. Suppose Haxton sold 100% of himself in $250K MTTs at a 10% markup. Then he makes $25K with no risk for a couple days work.

Presumably they are expecting to profit on these buyins in the long run. Just like if you bought into a bunch of Sunday majors. It is basically the same thing, but at much higher stakes.

This is the nature of high stake games cash or tournament. Not sure why people are upset about it. Maybe they are jealous.
Quote for what the ****
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 08:46 AM
Some people itt, especially op, better never walk by a craps game. They might go into shock from all the gambling.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 08:54 AM
Daniel Negreanu ‏@RealKidPoker 7h
@daniel_shak it's neither good or bad. If there is a market for a format and event type then people should be free to play as they wish.

Daniel Negreanu ‏@RealKidPoker 7h
@SammyTheDentist @daniel_shak if people want to play $1 mill turbos with endless rebuys, that is their choice and should be free to do it.

Yet Daniel was on the committee to have rebuys gone from WSOP because it was "buying a bracelet"
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 09:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LVpokerPRO
Yet Daniel was on the committee to have rebuys gone from WSOP because it was "buying a bracelet"
U act as if DN has no history of being a hypocrite...
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 09:22 AM
Unlimited rebuys do take the most trivial statistic in poker (lifetime tournament winnings) and makes it even more meaningless.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 09:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LVpokerPRO
Daniel Negreanu ‏@RealKidPoker 7h
@daniel_shak it's neither good or bad. If there is a market for a format and event type then people should be free to play as they wish.

Daniel Negreanu ‏@RealKidPoker 7h
@SammyTheDentist @daniel_shak if people want to play $1 mill turbos with endless rebuys, that is their choice and should be free to do it.

Yet Daniel was on the committee to have rebuys gone from WSOP because it was "buying a bracelet"
That's a bracelet though. These guys are only playing for the money.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 09:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by betgo
I probably would pay more than a 10% markup for Seidel or Ivey shares in one these. However, I am not sure how that is relevant. Suppose Haxton sold 100% of himself in $250K MTTs at a 10% markup. Then he makes $25K with no risk for a couple days work.

Presumably they are expecting to profit on these buyins in the long run. Just like if you bought into a bunch of Sunday majors. It is basically the same thing, but at much higher stakes.

This is the nature of high stake games cash or tournament. Not sure why people are upset about it. Maybe they are jealous.
Hey, man, How many Sundays are there in a year? 52? And it's still very possible to brick majors during the whole year just because of variance. Now, how many 100k$+ tourneys are there per year? 7-8 tops? What kind of long run are we looking at here? 20-30 years?
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad1Lee
Hey, man, How many Sundays are there in a year? 52? And it's still very possible to brick majors during the whole year just because of variance. Now, how many 100k$+ tourneys are there per year? 7-8 tops? What kind of long run are we looking at here? 20-30 years?
That's why you need lots of money to play these or people who will back you in them.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 10:07 AM
Wow timex is on godmode. From shortest stack ~2bb to chip leader. Must be ****ing nice
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 10:11 AM
What's really sick is that Negreanu and Haxton, who must have set some sort of record in terms of buy in amounts for a single tourney (outside of 1drop) and have dropped $1.285 million and $1.135 million in buyins respectively during the Aussie Millions(including ME and $25k event) are both guaranteed to come out with a profit at this point...
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 10:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by evildeadalive
That's a bracelet though. These guys are only playing for the money.
I still don't see the difference...if there is a market for unlimited rebuys in a tournament then people should be able to play it. If you can't afford 10 rebuys or whatever then don't play.

Also, I still think wsop got rid of rebuy events because they can't take juice off rebuys and the play is super deep so it lasts longer...they'd rather have people re-enter take the extra rake every time
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 10:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdeep27
What's really sick is that Negreanu and Haxton, who must have set some sort of record in terms of buy in amounts for a single tourney (outside of 1drop) and have dropped $1.285 million and $1.135 million in buyins respectively during the Aussie Millions(including ME and $25k event) are both guaranteed to come out with a profit at this point...
I was thinking the same thing earlier. Nice for them!
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 11:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaniac
Do people really think Daniel is contracted for an unlimited, elastic budget to play whatever tournaments he wants? Or more likely he is paid x-amount per year and has to budget his own tournament play out of that amount?

I have no idea the terms of Daniel's deal, but logic would dictate that the reality is closer to the latter scenario (Stars pays him x-amount, he pays y-amount for his poker buyins).
This. He also probably has bonuses built into his contract for TV tables, GPI standings, etc.

Edit: It's also very unlikely that if his contract includes a buy in to a 100 or 250k buyin tournament that it wouldn't be Stars branded

Last edited by 2005; 02-10-2014 at 11:48 AM.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 01:20 PM
So despite the risky bankroll management, Dneg and Ike profited 550k and 1.5m, respectively, between the two SHR's they fired multiple bullets in. I know it's being results oriented, but I think you have to be in these circumstances. Don't think either of these guys would have been crippled financially had they not cashed at all. At this point I'd bet that they are both happy with their decision to reenter.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-10-2014 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kre8tive
So despite the risky bankroll management, Dneg and Ike profited 550k and 1.5m, respectively, between the two SHR's they fired multiple bullets in. I know it's being results oriented, but I think you have to be in these circumstances. Don't think either of these guys would have been crippled financially had they not cashed at all. At this point I'd bet that they are both happy with their decision to reenter.
Yeh, it's amazing how these guys throw away money like that.
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote
02-11-2014 , 12:51 AM
i have an important question. When people get hair plugs how does the barber avoid cutting the fake hair? /strat
Daniel Negreanu buying in 100k Aussie challenge 5 times and Isaac Haxton 6 times? Quote

      
m