Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Big News: PokerStars Purchases FTP(?) Cliffs in OP Last update 4/24 1:02PM PT Big News: PokerStars Purchases FTP(?) Cliffs in OP Last update 4/24 1:02PM PT

05-16-2012 , 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RikaKazak
Just have him take 5 seconds to post on twitter.

It'd explode his twitter (good for him) and verify your claim.
Ya I have tried to get in touch with him. When he responds I will ask him to verify and tweet or post it somewhere.
05-16-2012 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeyrulesall
This just tweeted by kevmath

@Kevmath: Received a message from a member of the poker media. Pocket Kings contacted them to do a running inventory of how much they owed. #Progress?
05-16-2012 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinamaniac
Ya I have tried to get in touch with him. When he responds I will ask him to verify and tweet or post it somewhere.
yes, please do. i'm very curious to see this.
05-16-2012 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinamaniac
I have been reassured that there is a 99.9% chance the announcement of the purchase of Full Tilt Poker by Pokerstars will take place by the end of the week or early next week at the latest like originally reported.
What odds are you willing to bet on this? If you are 99.9% sure are you willing to give me 10:1? I'll bet my $100 to your 1k. If Stars announces by the end of the month that they have bought FTP and that they will be paying back in full (with a date) you win, otherwise I win.
05-16-2012 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShipItYo
yeah im a bit confused about the kevmath tweet... why would pocket kings contact a poker media source to do a running inventory of how much they owed..? #confused
Probably because they need to pay people back in order to run business properly
05-16-2012 , 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinamaniac
Probably because they need to pay people back in order to run business properly
but shouldn't pocket kings have that kind of information readily available? not some random poker media source...
05-16-2012 , 02:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShipItYo
how does me asking how/where this todd guy can verify his claims make this thread drop "lower"? All I did was ask where/how this guy can verify anything. I've said a few times it's ridiculous to not let DF/Noah verify.

I seriously think you just quote random **** in this thread and then try your best to berate that person/post in every way possible because you're either bored or THAT big of a loser.
Wasn't saying you asking this dropped the thread lower. I was saying the chain of events was just ridiculous. Don't be so sensitive sunshine.
05-16-2012 , 02:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShipItYo
but shouldn't pocket kings have that kind of information readily available? not some random poker media source...
I'm sure they do but verification always helps if your making a payment to someone
05-16-2012 , 02:16 PM
05-16-2012 , 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zachvac
What odds are you willing to bet on this? If you are 99.9% sure are you willing to give me 10:1? I'll bet my $100 to your 1k. If Stars announces by the end of the month that they have bought FTP and that they will be paying back in full (with a date) you win, otherwise I win.
He already has, and presumably can get more action at 1:1, so I'm gonna guess your **** outta luck for 10:1
05-16-2012 , 02:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zachvac
What odds are you willing to bet on this? If you are 99.9% sure are you willing to give me 10:1? I'll bet my $100 to your 1k. If Stars announces by the end of the month that they have bought FTP and that they will be paying back in full (with a date) you win, otherwise I win.
as far as i understand it, chinamaniac doesn't even claim to know the content of the anouncement you want to bet on, he just knows 99,99% that there will be an anouncement.

maybe its just the anouncement for the next anouncement of the anouncement.
05-16-2012 , 02:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deej_0607
He already has, and presumably can get more action at 1:1, so I'm gonna guess your **** outta luck for 10:1
:this
05-16-2012 , 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deej_0607
He already has, and presumably can get more action at 1:1, so I'm gonna guess your **** outta luck for 10:1
Has anyone even confirmed to bet with him? I'd be a lot more confident in his info if he did. I actually have a $500 1:1 bet on his side of that bet so not like I don't think we'll see an announcement just trying to hedge.
05-16-2012 , 02:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidian
as far as i understand it, chinamaniac doesn't even claim to know the content of the anouncement you want to bet on, he just knows 99,99% that there will be an anouncement.

maybe its just the anouncement for the next anouncement of the anouncement.
Official announcement from Stars of the purchase/takeover which is huge (which will most likely include what else we need and want to hear)
05-16-2012 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zachvac
Has anyone even confirmed to bet with him? I'd be a lot more confident in his info if he did. I actually have a $500 1:1 bet on his side of that bet so not like I don't think we'll see an announcement just trying to hedge.
2 guys in this thread that wanted early action wanted to book, I offered to still book theres. Another guy booked with me PM but not official till he escrows to me

Booked a lot on Skype with random people I talk to.

Could have booked up to 50k but I don't have those type of funds ATM
05-16-2012 , 02:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by moki
I guess I disagree. Chinamaniac is posting information that he believes to be credible; if the information ends up being incorrect, that reflects on his source, not Chinamaniac.

The thing to keep in mind is that situations like this are very fluid, his source may actually be quite correct at this time, but the outcome may be different depending on how it all goes down.

At the very least, he's providing some information he believes to be credible... which is more than the poker press is doing. Regardless of the result, I'm glad he's sharing what he believes to be credible information.

Saying that his reputation depends on the result of a volatile situation that no one can predict seems silly.
The reason it's such a problem is that last time his "source" was someone pretending to be Scott Matusow. China was told several times that he wasn't conversing with Scott, and even if he was, Scott verified that he had no info about the situation.

Now China refuses to name his source. Do you see why he's seen as a bull**** artist by this point? People are saying that if nothing comes this week that he won't be credible, but as far as myself and many others are concerned, he has no credibility, and had no credibility even before his May 1st post.

If he should happen to get this one right, it's like I said before...he got lucky. It's real easy to guess every week that something will happen and claim a source but refuse to name it or any details. That doesn't mean that when he's finally right that he was credible the whole time.
05-16-2012 , 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by XaQ Morphy

Now China refuses to name his source.
ya I should just tell you right ?

I will have it verified by days end.
05-16-2012 , 02:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by XaQ Morphy
The reason it's such a problem is that last time his "source" was someone pretending to be Scott Matusow. China was told several times that he wasn't conversing with Scott, and even if he was, Scott verified that he had no info about the situation.

Now China refuses to name his source. Do you see why he's seen as a bull**** artist by this point? People are saying that if nothing comes this week that he won't be credible, but as far as myself and many others are concerned, he has no credibility, and had no credibility even before his May 1st post.

If he should happen to get this one right, it's like I said before...he got lucky. It's real easy to guess every week that something will happen and claim a source but refuse to name it or any details. That doesn't mean that when he's finally right that he was credible the whole time.

look at his avatar - he must be credible!
05-16-2012 , 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zachvac
Has anyone even confirmed to bet with him? I'd be a lot more confident in his info if he did. I actually have a $500 1:1 bet on his side of that bet so not like I don't think we'll see an announcement just trying to hedge.
No. No one itt has yet confirmed a bet with him.
05-16-2012 , 02:29 PM
First rule of the Con, the scam, or the level. Find out what people want the most or what they want to hear, then tell them you will get it for them! Serve grape kool aid on the side!
05-16-2012 , 02:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidian
look at his avatar - he must be credible!
I block avatars here. Way too annoying. I base my decision of his credibility on his posts. So far none of them have been credible.
05-16-2012 , 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zachvac
Has anyone even confirmed to bet with him? I'd be a lot more confident in his info if he did. I actually have a $500 1:1 bet on his side of that bet so not like I don't think we'll see an announcement just trying to hedge.
Are you trying to take chinas side?
05-16-2012 , 02:40 PM
there are several crapy pokernewssites also claiming an anouncement like igaming, egr,...

are these sites chinamaniacs source, is chinamanic their source or is the source a third person?
05-16-2012 , 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidian
there are several crapy pokernewssites also claiming an anouncement like igaming, egr,...

are these sites chinamaniacs source, is chinamanic their source or is the source a third person?
all of the above, i think
05-16-2012 , 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidian
there are several crapy pokernewssites also claiming an anouncement like igaming, egr,...

are these sites chinamaniacs source, is chinamanic their source or is the source a third person?
It's possible they copied and re-worded my writeup cause it was done 2 weeks before most of these.

But again also very possible sources are the same or similar.

I certainly didn't get any info from these sites because mine was published 1st

      
m