Im not doubting that you are the better player between the two. Your admission to winning two tournies on his account eliminates any doubts in my mind.

Fwiw up until today I thought it was two separate people on the accounts and from how this thread played out, assumed you were the better player.

My only posting itt before today was just pointing out the fact that just playing with you was a pretty flimsy basis to go on when vouching for you. I never doubted your story until today when you admitted to multi accounting.

You are actually mistaken. Srry

It might not be a big deal if you played a few hands while he was in bathroom or eating but you being the better player and his excuse is being tired, it crosses the line. It seems that your genuine belief is you did nothing wrong, but you did. You cheated. Not that hard to figure out.

how when he is next to me???? how is that multi accounting???

Earlier itt when trying to convey you were a better player than your bf, you stated you played and shipped two tournies on his account. I assumed you were the one making decisions. Now you say he was right next to you but you were still playing. I don't really understand why he wasnt playing. But you being a higher-skilled player, playing on another's account when the account owner is capable of playing, is cheating and against site rules. Im not trying to attack you, just stating the obvious. Imo you hurt your credibility when in an almost brag-post, you admitted to playing on account other than your own and shipping two tournies. I honestly find it hard to quantify any of your excuses as legitimate.

lol

i <3 you guys!!!

Are you as good at English as you are at poker?

sorry was i typing too fast??? sometimes i close my eyes when i type, gomenasai

I'm sure it's all because you always type too fast, no worries.

san diego eh...i have relatives at alpine

Are they really sarcastic as well?

do i sound like i was being sarcastic?

This girl is borderline illiterate. I'm having a hard time buying that she's some poker wiz who is better than her boyfriend.

Anyway, that doesn't really matter anymore.

Apparently my last post tilted her into admitting that she and her boyfriend share accounts, which is what they were accused of in the first place.

I don't give a sh-t which of the two is the better player. We now know that they trade off playing on his account, so that's pretty much all we needed to know.

If Merge security wasn't such a joke, we could actually get something done about this.

there is no girlfriend and boyfriend playing, simply 1 douchebag pretending

thread is a sick sick level

No you're right, what was I thinking ...

There must be a lot of multi accounters on Merge. I started playing on RPM about a month and a half ago, and one of my opponents have the 3rd SN since I started playing there. I'm 100% sure about this, because he's stats are similar, he's name is similar, and all three SN's have the same location, which is a small European country. This is just one example, there must be a lot more I didn't notice. I didn't report him, because he plays with -10% ROI, and he stops playing the old account once he has a new, so I don't really care.

^Keep in mind it is perfectly fine to have accounts on all the merge skins as long as they never play at same time (afaik you can only be logged into one client at a time).

This is probably the case. Now if you saw them in the same tourney or same cash games table then I would be concerned.

Pretty sure one of the merge reps actually posted that its ok to play more than one account in each tournament on different computers at the same time. I'll try find the post.

no

This is only the case for skin specific tournaments, such as a VIP freeroll solely for Lock players, and solely for Carbon players, you can use 2 laptops and play both.

Skin-specific = ok
Merge-wide = Not ok

It's also possible a Merge rep posted that it is ok to do this, but he is wrong, it's definitely not ok to "multi-enter" these events under different skins

Well, Merge appears to be able to act semi-responsibly sometimes?

According to OPR, neither of the Hollister accounts appear to have played anything but three freerolls between them since shortly after she admitted to multi-accounting on the 21st (play stops on the 22nd for real money tournaments) with REALLY regular play before that.

Accounts closed? Funds taken? Either of those would be positive signs for the security department, so hopefully it was one of those and not that they just decided to create a few more accounts to move to...

[ ]accounts closed