Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
Ugh - people like wil##### annoy me way more than the majority of religious people.
Wil, you certainly seem more hateful than the majority of religious people I know (Although obviously nowhere close to the extreme level of hate of 'religious extremists')
I can understand that. You may think I'm arrogant or intolerant of people with different views. I used to think that way. As I see more and more injustice in the world due to religious lines of thinking, I've evolved into ridiculing and mocking people who are overly religious. When I say overly, I mean that they let it influence their thoughts and opinions on what others can and should do with their lives.
You may dislike the way I think, but if you think the way I think is worse than the way religious people think something is wrong.
BTW I don't believe I'm all that hateful. I just don't stand for that crap anymore. It doesn't "deserve respect", and I don't care if they are "offended". **** them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjshabado
I can. I understand the deep seated need plus cultural influences that cause someone to be religious. And for the majority of religious people in a comfortable economic status - they'll go about their lives being a net positive to society probably the same as the average non-religious person.
But I don't really understand the need/joy/burning passion that some people have to try destroy other people's viewpoints. Especially of the majority of those people that aren't hurting society.
You're very moderate in your way of thinking. I'm not that moderate when it comes to this subject anymore. Too many people are enablers. They believe in things that are less extreme than what others believe, but they still believe in things that aren't true. Believing in things that aren't true enable others to believe in things that aren't true also - except they are more dangerous.
If someone believes there is a man in the sky who listens to their thoughts and prayers and sometimes answers them, then how can they judge against a person who may do something like faith healing for their child who has cancer? That child dies due to this behavior, yet they may or may not pass judgment on whether they should suffer some sort of criminal penalty. Why? They both believe in the same crap, except one believes it may save their child while the other goes to the doctor like a normal ****ing person.
It's so absurd it's mind-boggling.
Last edited by wil318466; 11-28-2014 at 10:02 AM.