Quote:
Originally Posted by TAG-NIT
Would 6-man really be that much harder multi-tabling or would it be worth the attempt in terms of volume goals? By my question I'm obviously not a mass tabler, but I am curious of the difference.
6 mans are much harder to multitable. The action comes around much faster, which causes trouble in 3 ways.
1st) Hands (and therefore actions) come around significantly faster than in FR games. Playing 20 6max tables is far harder than playing 20 FR tables.
2nd) The already shorthanded games get shorter even faster. A 6m game doesn't last longer than a FR game, in fact, it's shorter. On the flip side, it's shorthanded for longer. You spend much of a 6m sng being 3-5 handed which causes them to move even faster than the equivalent 9m.
3rd) Because the games are shorter, not only is exploiting opponents more important, but stealing blinds is more important (because they come around more often). If you try to steal more, you're playing more hands which causes you to make more decisions.
Players can only multitable up to the point where they have time to make all decisions necessary. 6m games force you to make more decisions and play more hands. They're possible to multitable, but due to speed and hand ranges needed to succeed in 6m they're much harder than multitabling FR.
--------
Lol I just wrote an essay on something that could have been answered in a sentence...