Fixed with the help of Zandry.

Go into pgAdmin > Databases > current database > Schemas > Public > Tables > Right click pokersites > View Data > View All Rows > Change "IPoker" to "iPoker" (Capital I to small i). > Save > Quit

Ok, I did this and now it works again. Thank you.

Will be a few more days unfortunately, but I am really close

Are you aware that you can use the stat "BB fold to steal" in TableScan? You can show the column in Configure > Advanced > Columns, and add it to fish definitions/color profiles/scoring/etc, that's basically the same right?

Would it be possible to add a PFR/VPIP stat? I think it'd be more useful for ranking tables than just VPIP

Question for anyone (PM if necessary): How much more useful do you find this than simply keeping a buddy list like the PTR one?

I ask bc I play mainly on stars, which doesn't allow datamining, so I assume that this program ranks tables purely on stats you have already collected on players. Is this correct?

Im still getting a lot of NaN's on the fastest mode and there is nothing wrong with my internet connection - as mentioned above i thought that this was the case.

I change dthe scan speed to fast and there are only a few NaN's.

Is this a good choice for a beginner in online poker playing microstakes? I have never actually used tracking software, do have Kaspersky installed.

When will the server side scanning be available?

wtf does kaspersky - an anti virus software - got to do with turbo table scan and teh internet pokers?

perfect - thanks a lot!

level?
4k post

in case this is not a level:

tablescan turbo is not a tracking software like holdemmanager or pokertracker!

tablescan turbo is meant for tableselection and needs an existing hand-database of holdemmanager or pokertracker on your computer.

kapersky doesnt have anything to do with it. so don't worry.

whoops, I'm in the wrong thread, thanks. If anyone has tracking software recommendations please feel free to PM me.

Join waiting list doesn't work anymore for me on FTP since I reinstalled my OS this week end.

unbearable with party at fastest and fast. No NaN's at medium.

I just DL'ed and played around with it for a short session, but it looks really, really, awesome!!!

While running pstars, HEM, and various other programs, it seemed to be a bit much on my system. I was thinking of getting a new comp anyway, but I wanted to know if anyone has amassed massive databases to go along with this.

How much can HEM really support (I realize this is not a HEM thread, but its related)?

I was thinking of running this on stars and ftp at the same time; if I have a fast computer will I still run into issues with HEM and/or this program itself if I want to have a DB of a couple million hands?


To Zandry: It would be really useful if the site had a quick tutorial video. I figured out the most rudimentary things like how to start scan and join waitlists, but I feel I'm missing out on a lot of valuable info.

@johnes:
once the hands are in the database, HM and TST are completely unrelated.
so the question is: does a 10million+ hands database slow down your computer?
and no, it doesn't. PostgreSQL handles huge databases pretty well, if you vacuum/analyze regularly. pretty much any dualcore CPU should be enough for your needs. if you really want to speed things up, buy a SSD harddrive (will cost $500 for 160gb). A good SSD will really really speed up all database-stuff. (my recommendation: Intel X25-M G2 Postville 160GB)

You're saying PFR divided by VPIP? I don't think I'm planning to add more stats right now, but it should be pretty easy to combine PFR and VPIP in your scoring rules or fish definitions

Yes that's correct TableScan will only read the stats from your personal database, but I think a lot of players on stars/FTP buy hands from hand-selling websites to supplement their database. Either way I think it can be pretty useful even without a big database, like to find tables with a small # of shortstackers, or # of multitablers(coming update). Or you can designate some players you don't want to play with as "regulars" and easily avoid them. Or you can click "Advanced" in the scan filter to set it up to quickly only scan the tables with a plr/flp > X and Waitinglist = 0

Once I release this next update server side scanning is my top priority

Is this is happening consistently every time you run FTP/TableScan? I have heard of a bug like this happening once or twice but in those cases it was fine after a restart of FTP and TST. Maybe you can try resetting your FTP lobby widgets to default. If you can't get it working please send me a msg on AIM/MSN/ICQ/Skype
AIM: ZandryTST
MSN: zandry@tablescanturbo.com
ICQ: 571846001
Skype: ZandryTST

Ok well I think when you say NaN you mean that the player's names are not being read in from the table, like if you select the table in TST it will be empty? I can improve this a little so it gives it another try reading the player list at "fastest", but this is based on the speed that the player list loads, which is based on your connection to the site, so maybe you have a bad connection to their servers for whatever reason, in which case the right solution would be to lower the selection speed in TableScan

Thanks!
HM/postgres can definitely handle huge databases. There shouldn't be any database-related lag from TableScan as it is reading from the cached stats table, which means even if a player has >100k hands in your database, all their stats are stored in <20-30 rows in your database.
And yes I agree I really need to make some tutorials badly, I will definitely be doing it soon

Hello,
when i scan tables on absolute poker i dont get any stats on players (NaN everywhere) i did change it to scan cereus network, it works fine on ipoker ( expekt poker).

I'm having some issues with not being able to click on the CONFIGURE tab while tables are being scanned. I want to add people to the BUDDY LIST but I can't do it while scanning, and if I hit CANCEL the entire scan has to start from the beginning.

I'm not sure exactly what the autoscan interval is: would changing this give me more time in which I can hit CONFIGURE? Is this just how often it re-scans to check for changes in tables?

Also, is it possible that in future versions you can pause the scan without having to completely negate all the time you've put in to scanning tables?
There appears to be a STOP AUTOSCAN button, but while the scan is going the button can't be clicked.

Autoscan = A Scan will be performed automatically every X seconds. X is the "autoscan interval".

The application gets stuck (doesn't respond anymore, and the scan doesn't complete) always after some random number of scans. PartyPoker + HEM. Also would be nice if it would join the wait list even though the table is not full at the time I hit space, because when I open & join multiple tables at once, by the time they open, the one spot is sometimes filled, and I end up with full table without me being on the waitlist. SpadeEye has this feature btw.

Ok, please send me a message on AIM/MSN/ICQ/Skype and I can check it out on teamviewer
AIM: ZandryTST
MSN: zandry@tablescanturbo.com
ICQ: 571846001
Skype: ZandryTST

There is a much easier way to add buddies, and it works during scan
Just select the player(s) you wan't to add and right click > Add Buddy
And yes, autoscan interval is the amount of time between scans. And I have added an option to the next version so autoscan will wait to start the next scan if the program is in focus

If you can add me on AIM/MSN/ICQ/Skype and let me know more about the freezing I would appreciate it. For the joining waitlist, you're saying it should click join waitlist in the party lobby even if the table is not full at the time and that will work?

You should add a "steal" stat. Useful (necessary) for scoring and fish definitions.

I strongly support the idea of adding a "PFR divided by VPIP" stat.
This would be very good to use for player scoring and fish definitions.
Right now you can't do anything like it because if you say something like "in full ring, VPIP over 24 is a fish", then a player with a VPIP of 25 and PFR of 6 surely is a fish, but a VPIP 24 and PFR 17 player likely is a successful LAG player you won't like as much as the other guy.

It's the gap between VPIP and PFR that makes him a fish in that case.

It gets more complicated when you have a category like "VPIP between 24 and 32". You can't just make make a rule saying (for instance) Player Type A with "VPIP 24-32, PFR 12-100" is better than Player Type B with "VPIP 24-32, PFR 0-12" because a 31/13 certainly is a much worse player than a 24/16, yet they both will be considered a "Type A" player.

With the "PFR divided by VPIP" you can accomplish complex scoring with MUCH fewer rules than you would need to accomplish the same right now. I'm not even sure you could achieve the same level of detailed scoring.
So please, add this.

(You could also do it as a percentage like "PFR/VPIP %". It might be more comfortable to enter 73 instead of 0.73 but that's a matter of taste, I suppose)