TableScan Turbo
01-07-2010
, 12:14 PM
Quote:
There is a much easier way to add buddies, and it works during scan
Just select the player(s) you wan't to add and right click > Add Buddy
And yes, autoscan interval is the amount of time between scans. And I have added an option to the next version so autoscan will wait to start the next scan if the program is in focus
There is a much easier way to add buddies, and it works during scan
Just select the player(s) you wan't to add and right click > Add Buddy
And yes, autoscan interval is the amount of time between scans. And I have added an option to the next version so autoscan will wait to start the next scan if the program is in focus
Well this leads me to another problem. I can only add buddies this way if I'm at the table bc it was one of the highest vpip or contained what tablescan deemed a "fish." Otherwise, I can't locate the players to rightclick on them.
Whenever I try to filter the tables by name the whole thing messes up; it will usually get at best through the "F's" and many times will only show the tables starting with "A." The scan seems to start over form the beginning, though I think sometimes it just stops as well.
Is there a way I can either fix this or a better way to locate all the tables where I'm currently sitting???
01-07-2010
, 01:07 PM
01-07-2010
, 02:44 PM
01-07-2010
, 09:20 PM
01-08-2010
, 12:51 PM
Quote:
I strongly support the idea of adding a "PFR divided by VPIP" stat.
This would be very good to use for player scoring and fish definitions.
Right now you can't do anything like it because if you say something like "in full ring, VPIP over 24 is a fish", then a player with a VPIP of 25 and PFR of 6 surely is a fish, but a VPIP 24 and PFR 17 player likely is a successful LAG player you won't like as much as the other guy.
It's the gap between VPIP and PFR that makes him a fish in that case.
It gets more complicated when you have a category like "VPIP between 24 and 32". You can't just make make a rule saying (for instance) Player Type A with "VPIP 24-32, PFR 12-100" is better than Player Type B with "VPIP 24-32, PFR 0-12" because a 31/13 certainly is a much worse player than a 24/16, yet they both will be considered a "Type A" player.
With the "PFR divided by VPIP" you can accomplish complex scoring with MUCH fewer rules than you would need to accomplish the same right now. I'm not even sure you could achieve the same level of detailed scoring.
So please, add this.
(You could also do it as a percentage like "PFR/VPIP %". It might be more comfortable to enter 73 instead of 0.73 but that's a matter of taste, I suppose)
This would be very good to use for player scoring and fish definitions.
Right now you can't do anything like it because if you say something like "in full ring, VPIP over 24 is a fish", then a player with a VPIP of 25 and PFR of 6 surely is a fish, but a VPIP 24 and PFR 17 player likely is a successful LAG player you won't like as much as the other guy.
It's the gap between VPIP and PFR that makes him a fish in that case.
It gets more complicated when you have a category like "VPIP between 24 and 32". You can't just make make a rule saying (for instance) Player Type A with "VPIP 24-32, PFR 12-100" is better than Player Type B with "VPIP 24-32, PFR 0-12" because a 31/13 certainly is a much worse player than a 24/16, yet they both will be considered a "Type A" player.
With the "PFR divided by VPIP" you can accomplish complex scoring with MUCH fewer rules than you would need to accomplish the same right now. I'm not even sure you could achieve the same level of detailed scoring.
So please, add this.
(You could also do it as a percentage like "PFR/VPIP %". It might be more comfortable to enter 73 instead of 0.73 but that's a matter of taste, I suppose)
Quote:
Well this leads me to another problem. I can only add buddies this way if I'm at the table bc it was one of the highest vpip or contained what tablescan deemed a "fish." Otherwise, I can't locate the players to rightclick on them.
Whenever I try to filter the tables by name the whole thing messes up; it will usually get at best through the "F's" and many times will only show the tables starting with "A." The scan seems to start over form the beginning, though I think sometimes it just stops as well.
Is there a way I can either fix this or a better way to locate all the tables where I'm currently sitting???
Whenever I try to filter the tables by name the whole thing messes up; it will usually get at best through the "F's" and many times will only show the tables starting with "A." The scan seems to start over form the beginning, though I think sometimes it just stops as well.
Is there a way I can either fix this or a better way to locate all the tables where I'm currently sitting???
Quote:
I think what he is really getting at (either way, it's what I'm getting at)
is that the OPEN TABLE command doesn't work nearly as efficiently as the JOIN WAITLIST one.
He wouldn't be having the problem if the table just opened up quickly in the first place; this should be towards the top of the fix-it list IMO.
Sorry about so many posts too, I'm just really excited and trying to immerse myself in the program and I'm also not very tech savvy for someone who spends so much time on his comp
is that the OPEN TABLE command doesn't work nearly as efficiently as the JOIN WAITLIST one.
He wouldn't be having the problem if the table just opened up quickly in the first place; this should be towards the top of the fix-it list IMO.
Sorry about so many posts too, I'm just really excited and trying to immerse myself in the program and I'm also not very tech savvy for someone who spends so much time on his comp
I don't really understand what you're saying here, sorting the tables in TST by name messes it up? Or in the poker lobby? Also, the tables you're currently sitting at are highlighted yellow, with bold text. You can make it sort them to the top or bottom in Configure > Advanced > Sorting. And I don't know what you mean about the open table not working as well as the join waitlist, I would think open table should work better, what site are you playing at?AIM: ZandryTST
MSN: zandry@tablescanturbo.com
ICQ: 571846001
Skype: ZandryTST
01-10-2010
, 08:51 PM
When the wide layout I suggested a while back is coming (it is coming, right?), could you make it so that you can have different (independent) columns setups for the "players at selected table" list and the players list?
I would like to keep the players list simple and have the "players at selected table" list more detailed.
This will save space (screen width) and thus will make for a cleaner and clearer setup.
I would like to keep the players list simple and have the "players at selected table" list more detailed.
This will save space (screen width) and thus will make for a cleaner and clearer setup.
Last edited by Respawn; 01-10-2010 at 09:04 PM.
01-11-2010
, 08:46 PM
Quote:
Yeah, attempt to steal. Please add this. This is probably needed as a column for the player list though. Very useful for heads up in conjunction with "BB fold to steal".
I agree. It is only needed for scoring and fish definitions. In the players list you can easily see their VPIP and PFR and interpret the values yourself.
I agree. It is only needed for scoring and fish definitions. In the players list you can easily see their VPIP and PFR and interpret the values yourself.
Quote:
When the wide layout I suggested a while back is coming (it is coming, right?), could you make it so that you can have different (independent) columns setups for the "players at selected table" list and the players list?
I would like to keep the players list simple and have the "players at selected table" list more detailed.
This will save space (screen width) and thus will make for a cleaner and clearer setup.
I would like to keep the players list simple and have the "players at selected table" list more detailed.
This will save space (screen width) and thus will make for a cleaner and clearer setup.
But I dont think you'll be disappointed with the next update As for allowing different column visibility in the "players at table" list, I may do that eventually but I will have to think about it a bit more, it'd actually be a decent amount of work to change it the way I have things set up currently, and I wonder if most people wouldn't find it confusing and prefer it the way it is nowAre you using the latest version 0.45h? It seems to be working fine for me, if you are and it's not working please send me a message on AIM/MSN/ICQ/Skype and I can look on teamviewer
AIM: ZandryTST
MSN: zandry@tablescanturbo.com
ICQ: 571846001
Skype: ZandryTST
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/45...e-help-587868/
I know I've said this a few times and still haven't released it yet but I am working on it almost non-stop and I am really pressed to get it out within the next 2-3 days
Go into pgAdmin > Databases > current database > Schemas > Public > Tables > Right click pokersites > View Data > View All Rows > Change "IPoker" to "iPoker" (Capital I to small i). > Save > Quit
This will not affect your HM or any other programs
01-11-2010
, 08:55 PM
Can someone tell me whether it is safe to use this on FTP?
I have heard of people getting accounts closed because of using things like pokertableratings, and I really don' t want to have that happen.
Thanks for responses
I have heard of people getting accounts closed because of using things like pokertableratings, and I really don' t want to have that happen.
Thanks for responses
Last edited by Johnes Benjamin; 01-11-2010 at 09:04 PM.
01-11-2010
, 09:32 PM
FTP-Doug confirmed it in a FTP answers thread a few months ago, here is the thread, its question #30http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...0-15-a-608665/
01-11-2010
, 11:24 PM
01-12-2010
, 03:10 PM
01-12-2010
, 04:32 PM
01-12-2010
, 08:15 PM
01-12-2010
, 08:50 PM