By the way, I would be interested how many of you who think SA should have been found not guilty also think Casey Anthony's verdict was justified?

By long shot i dont mean it s stupid , but one guy thinking it s possible is still a long shot and that picture of the serial killer on site could me some coincidence of a guy looking like him.
Still make way more sense than any story we have been told so far.

Insane NO..But imo he lacks judgement on watching human suffering/death in a video, & I am glad you agree

#Reasonabledoubt.

Funny you are not calling him sick? He said he has seen similar stuff before.

Smacc,

Morbid curiosity exists in all humans. It's why people slow down to look at traffic accidents, have open casket funerals, and watch emotional documentaries about death like Dear zachary or plenty of war docs. It's why people were glued to the TV during 9/11, and why people go to Holocaust museums.

I am glad you are dense enough to not realize it exists in everyone, but I think it is due to you being too busy trying to sit on an artifical throne of superiority. It makes you look silly, not normal.

I can guarantee if I were to post a link saying I found a pic of theresa's body before Avery burned it and labeled it as graphic and not safe for work you would click. Even after you watched a documentary on the subject and know what they were accused of doing, you would click on it.

Maybe instead of trying to act superior you should try to think about things from an objective point of view.


But please insinuate people are psychopaths more.

I agree that it does make more sense than SA.
John A Cameron got me hooked on a podcast I watched about this last nt so I thought I would post when it was still fresh in my memory & yes the Image of him standing in the court building behind the camera was creepy, so when I heard JC say that he done the same in the west memphis 3 I had to look further into E.W.E. & still am. This dude needs looking into imo & you just never know where that rabbit hole will go.

#reasonabledoubt.

source?

Smacc doesn't think I am a psycho. Hes just trying to attack me because he doesn't like my conclusion on the avery case, or he doesn't like the way I post. Either way, kind of a silly assumption to make about me based on what I said in the thread.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven...ote-chandler-6

Going by wiki, which sources a news article. not sure how accurate either are here.

Obviously, but I think it's more fun to break down how stupid he is being without simply saying how incredibly immature it is to effectively throw insults at a person because you dislike their opinion on a controversial court case. That would be a much shorter post, and I like arguing.

By all means call me dense all you want just because you think that some ppl don't want to watch morbid snuff movies. And stop changing the subject to accidents ect, that was not what we were arguing about in the 1st place.

#reasonableboubt
#reasonabledoubt
#reasonabledoubt

I don't even think you have a good grasp on what "reasonable" doubt is.

It's far from a change of subject. Have you ever watched the a video of 9/11? How many people died there? If you want to argue that there is a fundamental difference between watching thousamds of people be crushed by a falling builidng, jumping to a their desth, and being engulfed in flames, relative to watching someone get cut with an ice pick, than by all means go for it, I would love to hear the rationalization. But the reason most people don't watch the later and watch the first is because they are worried of becoming queezy, they just draw the line around certain deaths they are fine watching.

Did you watch the video of the reporter being shot? Budd Dywer? JFK assasination? Just because someone can stomach watching a video you can't doesn't make them more likely to be a psychopath.

How's that pedestal holding up?

If by "all" you mean "some" then you are correct.

Hmmm... I've never done any of those things, nor felt any desire to do so. Maybe I'm not human, though.

I would bet any amount of money I could prove that opposite(that you never have willing done something out of morbid curioisty) busto. Let me know. We can do a lie detector test or many other things.

Again stop changing the subject from accidents to actual MURDER.

Wut, snuff films are actual murder. JFK is actually murder. You never seen that? Again you are drawing an arbitrary line, is 3000 accidental deaths better than 1 murder? Maybe.

Never seen any war clips?

Edit: where does suicide rank? I watched a documentary on suicide at the golden gate bridge. Amy I 2x psychopath? I have also seen Budd Dywer suicide. Damn. Brb. Turning myself in.

i can't be the 1rd to notice this

I do not watch 9/11 material. I remember the day that I walked into my friends pub that day & will never ever forget it for the rest of my life, I can even remember the exact time, & I can honestly say it was the 1st time in my life I could not speak & I had a tear in my eye once the 2nd plane hit I had to look away until my friend told me that the building was falling down & at that exact moment we both walked out his place to go get supplies & we were both shocked by what we had seen.
I've only seen the movie JFK & 1 other doc on it, and I hate to admit it but I have to look away when the actual bullet hits in the doc cause you Know I'm dense.

#Reasonabledoubt

Nah your dense because you apply your world view to others and even go on to heavily imply people with stronger stomachs (basically what it builds down to) are worse people than you. It's not even an argument of relative or absolute morals. It's an argument of relative v absolute v smacc' moral.(aka it's absolute and you are perfect)

Your posts show a complete lack of understanding of differences in the ability for different people to view different things and have different reactions. But that doesn't make you dense, what makes you dense is that you take your view as correct and gospel.

Be that as it may, you still know it isn't inhuman to have morbid curiosity. It is actually quite common. It is no indication of someone being a sociopath.

It's generally theorized morbid curioisty comes from a desire to feel alive. It's somewhat comparable to people who a terminally ill, face with a grim fate report feeling more alive than ever.

If it makes you feel any better smacc I don't go around googling top 5 snuff films of 2015. I read about a thing and then feel a desire to watch it(which is the case with most people).

I can see that.. I also think it being taboo peeks peoples interest.

WOW-You asked my opinion on 9/11, JFC & some1 else, i gave you my answer.
YOU decided to jump to the defense of another poster itt who I said I would not be replying to & I had sound reason too.LOL & CCuster(you)even agreed.
Like you said you do like an argument.
I never implied that I was perfect or superior WOW, I didn't jump into someone else's argument.
I expressed my opinion to the poster who I replied to that IF he watched snuff movies(he did not disagree) I would not be interacting with him in a discussion about MaM & it was not because he thought SA & BD was guilty as I have replied to poorskillz etc itt, I have my reasons & the main 1 was admitting to watching actual snuff movies.
But yeah my morals are definitely better than yours, you have proved that 100%.

#Reasonabledoubt
CCuster's#Reasonabledoubt- as I know you believe SA&BD did not get a fair trial.
Is this #reasonable for you so as we can get back to the discussion about MaM?
If not PM me.

neither of those are true.