Quote:
Originally Posted by J0hny
You are right, but i think it's way too wide range to put him responsible for it.
If a guy robs a supermarket for some bread you can't say it was supermarket's fault that hey have so damn high prizes that people have to do crime to survive.
Everything is connected in this world, that doesn't make one instantly responsible for something imo.
This is a terrible analogy, seriously terrible.
In your case, the guy that robs the supermarket is KNOWINGLY robbing the supermarket. It's not the fault of one single person running meth.
Now, if Walt ran meth in this guys town, and the guy became a meth head only because Walt introduced blue meth in his town, and that guy got addicted and got divorced, lost his job, lost his house, and was living on the street poor, and THEN stole a loaf of bread, then you could argue that is Walt's fault as well.
The fact here: if Walt took charity from his old partner, he wouldn't be in a place where Skylar doesn't want an audit.
If Skylar cooked the books, and didn't fear Walt's prosecution, Ted doesn't end up in the hospital.
Mainly because she doesn't have 600,000 to bribe him with, or Saul to goon him up.