Quote:
Originally Posted by thebigeasy59
Smoak doesn't exactly have a track record of being good, and Colabello's entire history of success is pretty babip driven. Trading EE is bad, and that's why it didn't happen before he got 10-and-5. Talk of an EE trade is bordering on tarding up the thread.
Listen. I have read you posts. You are really knowledgeable about many organizational and statistical things. Me, not so much. I played organized and competitive baseball from 6 to 18. My knowledge is more around the fundamentals of the game than it is around the organizational aspects. I learn lots from you and Gary Wise et al about organizational and contract matters, etc..
As for your comment about talk of an EE trade tarding up the thread, get real. We all remember Wells getting traded when everyone on this thread felt strongly that he was literally untradeable. I know this is different, but his contract was seen to be unmoveable. Yet, it happened. Anything can happen. Hell, we could even land Donaldson for Lawrie in some strange world!!
The team is aging, that is clear. Other than probably Martin and Donaldson, there is no Jay who is untradeable, so talking that EE is tradeable is a perfectly acceptable opinion. The Dickey trade proved that even the best prospects are on the table if the deal is right.
It would be helpful if you shared a list of Jays along with EE who you think would not be traded this year under any circumstances. I am sincere. You seem to have a handle on these dealings.
Who would be on such a list along with EE?
PS. You say trading EE is bad, without even knowing what could come our way. How is that comment even logical?