Quote:
Originally Posted by Montecore
EV,
Thanks for the tip, but burning 270 or so calories while listening to a podcast seems fine to me. As an OLD, I think the lower impact is probably preferable to burning calories 66% faster (especially since I'm more concerned about total calories burned then the rate I'm burning them, and running for 45 minutes is not something I'm interested in doing no matter what my fitness level ends up being). If I add in some HITT it'll be on a bike, but walking is working out fine for now.
Oh yeah, the rate doesn't matter. I agree lower impact is better and total calories being burnt is the same difference. I dunno, it's just hard for me to be there that long on a treadmill knowing I could be more effective. If it's your preference, more power to you especially as long as you are hitting your total calories burnt each week. How much do you aim for?