Hi guys,
This post went to the 6-max NLHE before, by mistake, so I'm reproducing it exactly as I wrote it there.
I'm not a cash player (actually, I'm not a holdem player either...)but I wanted to do an experiment as my tournament results became a little fuzzy lately. Anyway, I wanted to do 10k hands at micro stakes and see how it goes. Surprisingly, I'm ahead after almost 12k hands:
What worries me the most though is my positional play, and even though I made some other important mistakes, I think I'm definitely doing something wrong on my button play:
I did these hands multiplaying 16 tables at a time, and I was not quite used to this sort of playing before (at most I multitabled 8 tourneys at once, and I cannot play more than that as I'm not capable of coping with the different structures, but for 2NL I'm OK with 16). So this lead to some mistakes, notably calling with kings on a dry board when I KNEW my nit opponent must have hit a set...I guess I still need to learn one or two things about multitabling before I can even consider myself a decent player.
I don't know if the winnings graph helps you analyze my play, but it certainly shows that I was a bit lucky as my real winnings are way greater than the EV correlated ones:
So I would REALLY appreciate it if someone with more experience than myself could take a look and give me some hints on what I may do to improve my game, or if someone can tell me if I'm doing something wrong.
And, the most important question: what would be a statistical significant sample size to conclude that one is a winning player and that he can beat the respective limit? I doubt 10k is sufficient enough (I was down after a third of that, I can easily see how this could have been the case for 10k hands). Would 50k do? 100k? More than that
?
Thanks a lot guys!