lol... these mother ****ers got me all happy for a sec then i realize this can't happen

I was able to reach 4,000SP during the "get paid weekend" last month just by 4-tabling NL200-400 (over 10 hours a day though). If you play NL1k or 8-table, 6,000SP shouldn't be a big problem.

unreal

I was referring to the "get rewards" bonus in the cashier...

lol at playing 8 tables on pacific

On the off-chance "Styris..." reads this thread: Stop berating the fish in chat you bellend

How many Fero0xx's are there? Played today with two of them at the same table, both were from the same country (Slovakia maybe).

any full ring action at pacific nl100 + nl200?

not really

there is just two i think. its weird they are both from the same country. FEROOOOOO

also, google image his name and this dashing fellow comes up.




niceeee

wait...
you google image pac's people?

you are right, at least he is not egosentric:

Dealer >> (Hand# 208110941) Kuchiki won $30, didn't show hand
Dealer >> (Hand# 208110948) scrotusD won $80, didn't show hand
NOMORETILT >> ahh the great kuch
Dealer >> (Hand# 208110971) Kuchiki won $30, didn't show hand
NOMORETILT >> why u ran yeasterday?
Dealer >> (Hand# 208110989) Kuchiki won $80, didn't show hand
Kuchiki >> had to o
Kuchiki >> go
Kuchiki >> u got quite lucky ;o
NOMORETILT >> mm
Dealer >> (Hand# 208111992) Kuchiki won $80, didn't show hand
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112036) Kuchiki won $80, didn't show hand
scrotusD >> kuch if i keep cutting out im leaving
scrotusD >> my internet is *** right now
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112062) Kuchiki won $30, didn't show hand
Kuchiki >> w/e
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112387) Kuchiki won $30, didn't show hand
Kuchiki >> hmmm
Kuchiki >> im running really good
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112407) scrotusD won $5,139 with Three-of-a-Kind Sixes
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112407) scrotusD won $3,871 with Three-of-a-Kind Sixes
scrotusD >> ul
Kuchiki >> u didnt really deserve to win this tho =(
Kuchiki >> considering u're such a huge HU nit
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112494) scrotusD won $199, didn't show hand
Kuchiki >> cant see u ever achieve a good winrate vs good players
scrotusD >> ive actually done quite well HU in my time
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112535) scrotusD won $449, didn't show hand
Kuchiki >> yeah playing set over set is tough
Kuchiki >> isnt it ?
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112608) scrotusD won $80, didn't show hand
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112630) Kuchiki won $80, didn't show hand
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112663) scrotusD won $80, didn't show hand
scrotusD >> 2nd and 5th last two years at WHUPC
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112684) scrotusD won $30, didn't show hand
Kuchiki >> ............
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112697) scrotusD won $80, didn't show hand
Kuchiki >> dat sure means a lot.......
Kuchiki >> r
Kuchiki >> ofl
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112715) Kuchiki won $80, didn't show hand
scrotusD >> why wouldnt it
scrotusD >> its HU
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112742) Kuchiki won $30, didn't show hand
scrotusD >> last time we had a HU session i took about 7 buyins off you at 10/20
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112757) Kuchiki won $80, didn't show hand
scrotusD >> I know you are running pretty *** but you are awful too
Kuchiki >> i never lost 7 buy ins vs anyone lol
Kuchiki >> im awful?
Kuchiki >> =(
Kuchiki >> even tho i win more than you ?
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112783) scrotusD won $80, didn't show hand
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112826) scrotusD won $30, didn't show hand
scrotusD >> you sure do buddy
Kuchiki >> you think i'm awful because i dont play
scrotusD >> hey get unstuck then talk *** please
Kuchiki >> by-the-book no mistake pre flop
Kuchiki >> ?
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112839) scrotusD won $209, didn't show hand
Dealer >>Didier78 just hit the Jackpot and won $136.46!
Kuchiki >> i think u dont know who u're talking too :P
Dealer >> (Hand# 208112888) scrotusD won $30, didn't show hand

tldr. Who cares about all this annoying ****... I'm not even sure if I had such useless conversations at school when I was 4 ... All this thread is so ****ing pathetic.


The only great thing about this thread is that it helped Yuv to make the pacific poker software a little bit better. Thanks to him and some non-******s regulars who post to suggest something. About this, I will take a shot!

- Auto post BB when I'm on the big blind feature
- Don't shuffle the name of the tables after each refresh in the lobby
- Auto rebuy option (It would be so easy to program, and so much better)
- When we use the shortcuts (F5, F6, F7), it would be great if it checks the "fold/check" button even if it's not our turn to act
- Delete the fast tables, or add a +15 secs timer, hard to 8 tables with the fast tables
- It's great to have ten seats on 6 max to choose the position, but it would be great to display 3 seats on the top on the table, and 3 seats on the bottom of the table. Sometimes there are 1 player on the left, 1 player on the right, 1 on the top, and 3 on the bottom, kind of tilting imo!


Thanks by advance !

lol. good thing i moved off this crappy site.. such morons on there

I play everywhere pretty much, except FTP, nice try though

I'm afraid the 888 staff no longer cares about us. I haven't seen Yuv posting here for months. Their software updated like half a year ago last time.

6 months ago some guy, not Yuv but some 888 soft developer, asked me what improvements I would like to see. We exchanged a couple of PMs. He finally thanked me and even gave me a free tournament ticket for cooperation. I was hoping that finally something was about to change with the software towards improvement. Nothing happened.

Thanks. Just as an FYI, these are very helpful. Not all the time we can implement them, as we have some bigger projects in development, but every version we try and fix some of these annoying small things that change a lot.

Just a couple of answers:

Regarding the fast tables, a time bank is fully operational (for a while), but we have issues with some old versions and this feature. We will be implementing it very soon.

Improved re-buy mechanism for cash games is coming up in the next version (a month away)

I'm not 100% sure, but i think the shuffling problem was fixed for the upcoming version. I'll check this to make sure.

Regarding the 6/10 seats tables - eventually, in the big project we're planning for next year, we will not have these tables any more (they will be, you know, 6 seats for 6 handed. Who would have thought..).

Because the majority of the resources are workign on this, I doubt we will make changes in this area in the meantime.

I will forward the rest of the request and see what we can do and when.

longer password, password change please..

I hope you do think the software improved in the last year or so.

It hasn't improved at all when it comes to the look & feel and user interface. This is something we are working on now.

As far as stability, I think we have moved quite a bit forward in the last year.

Nooooooooooooooooooo I'm sure most will agree that 10 seats for 6m is better as it gives the player more of a choice where they sit. I like to have the option of were I sit. This is really useful when there's some aggro shortstack playing push or fold poker, the last thing I want is for them to be to my left.

I hope you don't make the gameplay slower. That is the one thing I really love about pacific, if you want a timebank and 5 minutes per decision, just play on full tilt. Especially heads up.

QFT

One of the main reasons to play at the Pacific network.

hh

#2

Yuv, how far is FPP shop ?

I've noticed we now see showdown cards even when mucked. I'm not sure this is good. I guess the fish don't shee it anyhow so OK.
As for the 6-max tables actually being 6 seats-- like most everyone I like a choice of seats.

I've also noticed we now have have handhistory/HEM/PT support for PLO, but not O8.
The software team really have to learn to develop some generic classes. I say that as a 24 year IT professional. WTF are you guys doing with that SVC library?