Quote:
Originally Posted by Stake Monster
40bb in HEM? i'd love to see a screenshot of that. and I think it's foolish to think a good player who is able to beat up HS regs couldn't destroy a bad player. Unless he's dumb enough to not adjust his play properly..then he's not that good to begin with.
I'm probably not allowed to post the graph, but it's ~ 500K hands, 16.73BB aka 33.46bb/100 lifetime, 100% HU.
I'm pretty sure a high-stakes regular is going to have better winrate if next 500K hands all he does is bumhunts the same, but I meant if he plays standard "some % of bumhunt and some % of battling vs regulars" game, does he have better winrate vs fish than guys who only purely bumhunt and are really good at it? I mean, regulars might not do idiotic and super obvious/easily exploitable things like pot-pot-pot 3 streets with strong hand because usually they play other regulars and they just can't use such an obvious lines, but vs not thinking players this could work better than standard 2/3...
I'm not saying i'm correct, just a thought, hope you understood it better now