Dynasty Fantasy Baseball League Thread - Puzzles and Other Games Forum

Two Plus Two Forums Sports and Games Puzzles and Other Games

Dynasty Fantasy Baseball League Thread

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 1 of 242

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 11 21 51 101 201

Last

Page 1 of 242

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 11 21 51 101 201

Last

02-18-2011 , 09:26 PM

Ludovic Banhammer

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,975

In this thread, we put all things to do with the POG dynasty fantasy baseball league, including abuse and mockery.

participants:
Ludovic Banhammer
kongs
SarcasticRat
xxsooted
J.D.
BingoBango
bsball
wahoopride
la peste
ovrthetop111
TomVeil
manupod
Aries
mets

All off-season stuff can be found here:
http://pogbaseball.proboards.com/index.cgi

Quote

02-20-2011 , 01:50 PM

metsandfinsfan

banned

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 160,445

bump so it's in my subscriptions

Quote

02-20-2011 , 02:00 PM

TomVeil

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,374

Fear me, my team is 100% Royals at this point!

Quote

02-20-2011 , 02:04 PM

bsball8806

bff with birdman

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 47,384

i definitely just flushed 50 bucks down the toilet- but I will at least will have fun watching it swirl around

Quote

02-20-2011 , 02:13 PM

TomVeil

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,374

Better to lose it to me in 6 months than lose it to some random at the tables in 6 minutes?

Quote

02-20-2011 , 02:26 PM

metsandfinsfan

banned

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 160,445

Quote:

Originally Posted by bsball8806

i definitely just flushed 50 bucks down the toilet- but I will at least will have fun watching it swirl around

100 if you are laying out for me laying out for me, thats what she said

Quote

02-20-2011 , 07:15 PM

Ludovic Banhammer

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,975

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomVeil

Fear me, my team is 100% Royals at this point!

With luck, this will continue when we start sorting out the big leaguers too. I'm curious as to just how badly the Royals would do at 12 team roto.

Quote

02-20-2011 , 07:18 PM

Ludovic Banhammer

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,975

More seriously, I would like input on prize distribution, and on when to start the auction. There are threads in the general section of Proboards on this. If you haven't looked at them, please do, as I will eventually assume that anyone who hasn't said anything is happy with whatever we decide.

Quote

02-20-2011 , 07:30 PM

TomVeil

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ludovic Banhammer

With luck, this will continue when we start sorting out the big leaguers too. I'm curious as to just how badly the Royals would do at 12 team roto.

Can't be worse than they do in the MLB.

Quote

02-20-2011 , 07:33 PM

#10

TomVeil

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,374

If we have 14? I think we should do 60/30/10% I'm not opposed to giving 4th $50 for entry into next year either.

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:06 PM

#11

J.D.

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 17,749

I say pay top 3, 60/30/10 sounds good.

Also, havent read all the rules, but an interesting twist in a league I was in was going 4-12th (12 team league) then 3/2/1 for the rookie draft. kept potential tanking at bay.

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:07 PM

#12

TomVeil

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,374

I am down for that or a weighted lottery system for the 4-12 picks. In this format I don't think the drafting order will be a huge deal, since we have a minor league team too.

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:16 PM

#13

Ludovic Banhammer

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,975

I suggested 400/200/100, more because the numbers are neater than anything else.

I'm a little worried that people might tank, especially when there is a clear number one pick like Strasburg, who is major league ready at a level which impacts on a 14 team league, but then I do like the idea that the worst team gets the chance to get the best player, just to make it a little easier to rebuild.

One suggestion that was made on the Proboards thread was to have whoever was last having to pay an extra $50 into the next year's kitty. I suspect that would reduce tanking, but I wouldn't want to do that, unless everyone was happy with it.

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:17 PM

#14

metsandfinsfan

banned

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 160,445

id give 4th 50

350/200/100/50 - 1st still gets 50%

5-12 lottery -- but give 5 8 entries, 6 7 entries, etc

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:17 PM

#15

TomVeil

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,374

I'd suggest lottery then. Weight it and give all teams 4-12 a CHANCE for the top 3 picks.

I'd have to look into the numbers, but basically just like the NBA system.

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:18 PM

#16

TomVeil

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan

id give 4th 50

350/200/100/50 - 1st still gets 50%

5-12 lottery -- but give 5 8 entries, 6 7 entries, etc

I think 4th should at least pay for the next year as well.

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:20 PM

#17

J.D.

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 17,749

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomVeil

I am down for that or a weighted lottery system for the 4-12 picks. In this format I don't think the drafting order will be a huge deal, since we have a minor league team too.

Just to play devils advocate, in the last two years the #1 picks would have been Strasburg and Bryce Harper.....

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:21 PM

#18

wahoopride

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 39,874

if we just randed everyone that didnt make the $ that would work for me

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:23 PM

#19

TomVeil

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by J.D.

Just to play devils advocate, in the last two years the #1 picks would have been Strasburg and Bryce Harper.....

Yes, but we're also having a pretty robust system in place here as well already.

And I'm not sure how that's devil's advocate to a lottery

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:35 PM

#20

J.D.

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 17,749

I have no problems with a lottery system.

My point was more how in any league format a stud could affect your future, and why tanking needs to be dealt with.

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:36 PM

#21

TomVeil

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,374

Quote:

Originally Posted by J.D.

I have no problems with a lottery system.

My point was more how in any league format a stud could affect your future, and why tanking needs to be dealt with.

Oh. Yeah F tankers. I thought you were responding to a different post I made. Baseball drafts aren't like basketball or football where people are playing a year after they graduate. Sure there may be a stud or two every year, but even then it's rare for them to really contribute until they've been in the system 2 or 3 years.

Unless you drafted Royals, then they'll probably start the year with the club

Quote

02-20-2011 , 09:38 PM

#22

J.D.

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 17,749

The last two drafts are certainly out of the ordinary, can't argue with that.

Of course, Strasburg now wont be a force for 2-3 years anyways.

Quote

02-21-2011 , 11:24 AM

#23

AriesRam

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 14,512

Quote:

Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan

bump so it's in my subscriptions

Quote:

Originally Posted by bsball8806

i definitely just flushed 50 bucks down the toilet- but I will at least will have fun watching it swirl around

Quote:

Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan

id give 4th 50

350/200/100/50 - 1st still gets 50%

Quote:

Originally Posted by wahoopride

if we just randed everyone that didnt make the $ that would work for me

+4.

Quote

02-21-2011 , 11:28 AM

#24

AriesRam

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 14,512

Also, not sure where to ask on the other board, so

If we draft a minor leaguer who gets called up, do we HAVE to sign him to a rookie contract? It doesn't appear that way, but I can't tell for sure.

What are the implications for your salary cap if you don't sign him to a rookie contract during the season?

Also, are rookie contracts 3 years @ $1 per year or 3 years @ $3 per year?

Thanks.

Quote

02-21-2011 , 05:11 PM

#25

Ludovic Banhammer

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 3,975

Quote:

Originally Posted by AriesRam

No, you don't have to sign a player who gets called up. You can choose to, if you think he can contribute. However, once you give him a contract, you are stuck with it, if he's sent down or doesn't perform.

At the end of the season that he loses rookie eligibility, you have to decide whether to sign him to a rookie contract or release him.

If you don't sign a player, he earns no salary, and cannot be used - if you want him to play, you have to sign him.

Rookie contracts are 3 years at $3/year.

Quote

Page 1 of 242

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 11 21 51 101 201

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 1 of 242

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 11 21 51 101 201

Last