Quote:
Originally Posted by BeaucoupFish
I am comparing Skype to, say, the AIM client, which appears to be a security risk nightmare. I don't exactly know why, but sounds like it is easily hacked and you are not protected from malicious links in chat (is that about right?).
So is Skype safer to use from those perspectives, and/or what makes Pidgin better? Or are these always going to be a major security concern? Encryption of conversations is not important to me (since we don't have any control of the other party's environment).
Nice job anyway.
I can't claim that Pidgin is more secure than the AIM client, but Pidgin is not a glorified adware client so I can claim that much. AIM does have some features that could expose you. (e.g. Direct IM). I also can't claim that the Skype client is more secure than any other client. The security issues that arose with AIM (re: accounts being hacked by some superuser resetting passwords) were related to the AIM network and not necessarily the AIM client. I can't verify or deny the superuser claims, though.
I believe the fears over the AIM client being a huge security risk is a bit of selection bias (i.e. Those who use the AIM client are generally less informed than Pidgin users.) It's similar to what we see with McAfee on this forum.
Chat is a security concern if you're just clicking links willy nilly. There used to be chat viruses that would infect AIM profiles and start IMing people on your buddy list. These things would be prevented with a combination of Pidgin & NoScript.