'I don't deny climate change, I just don't think we should ever do anything about it, because Al Gore is lame, and international treaties are stupid, and I don't want to be on the same side as crusty liberals who care about things.'
Quote:
yeah, Im coming at it from a different perspective than the two "sides". I guess believing the science but not the cult of Al Gore having all the answers puts me in group 3, a Dempublican.
This, and basically everything posted by Thayer, is just embarrassing. You're not in group 3. You want to think you're in a group 3 because you think you're too cool for group 1. If you think MMCC is real, and think literally anything should be done to prevent it or slow it down, you're in group 1, with all the rest of us, and Al Gore, and the crusty libtard environmentalists.
The reason the discussion of what to actually do about MMCC never moves forward in America is because half the country won't even accept the premise.
Having established that nobody here actually denies climate change, why don't you guys suggest what you actually think should be done, beyond 'more efficiency' and 'whiny libtard tactics aren't working'?
At least wooderson had enough balls to actually take a position, even if the position was 'let all the poors in hot countries die because I have air conditioning'.