Quote:
Originally Posted by x_ROSH125_x
Artur Beterbiev seems like some kind of a beast. Saw him for the first time yesterday
He looks really good. Hoping we can get him vs Stevenson at some point, that would be a fun fight.
I think his defense is too weak for Ward/Kovalev, but who knows, that's why they fight the fights.
Quote:
I haven't seen Daniel Jacobs fight before. He's currently #2 at 160 and is fighting Golovkin in March. Is there any chance of an upset? There isn't a market yet on betfair.
I don't think there's much of a chance. Golovkin's chin is well tested and Jacobs isn't a hit and duck kind of fighter. Golovkin will tag him, and his chin isn't great.
Jacobs has good boxing skills and some power, but I don't think he's is the type of fighter with a real shot against GGG at 160lbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Consty
Whilst we're talking odds, interesting to see that Wlad is over 2/1 to beat big Josh.
I think it's Joshua's time. Wlad looked pretty bad vs Jennings, and even worse vs Fury. It's likely no coincidence, he's 40 years old and Joshua is too big to bully and too good to outsmart.
Povetkin and Pulev were just oversized, and Leapai and Pianetta were not in the same league skillwise.
The only hesitation is "Joshua hasn't fought many good opponents at this level" and "Joshua was rocked by Whyte and didn't look right for a few minutes." Those are not very big ifs in my book. We're seeing time and again, a solid eye test is worth a lot. Golovkin, Usyk, Gassiev, Crawford. Joshua looks more like them than the numerous busts. I'd say Parker can still go either way.
Last edited by ChicagoRy; 12-25-2016 at 02:28 AM.