Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS
View Poll Results: It's the Eastern Conference Finals; Do you know where your sister-in-law is?
MARRRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
19 41.30%
Yes
5 10.87%
No
4 8.70%
lol canada
15 32.61%
Most un-biased OP ever
4 8.70%
How many cups could a Kovalchuk win if a Kovalchuk could Kovalcup?
9 19.57%
lol flyers
18 39.13%
bastard
3 6.52%
THE New York Rangers
13 28.26%
Bible lied. There's more than one devil
8 17.39%

05-17-2012 , 10:22 AM
no, no one else does what torts does, because NHL coaches understand that part of the job is talking to the press, and not being a giant baby.

i mean, his bitchiness has produced some legendary press conferences, including this one which is pretty similar to last night's (NSFW): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AU8CJQiAycI
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 10:23 AM
nyc: that was def going in.

x: hmm...didn't think about that...was there a whistle between that and the handpass in our zone? if it wasn't there and back then it's like chaos theory and the butterfly flapping its wings lol.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xander
He's a baby. He chats it up when they win and acts like a child when they lose. Part of his job is addressing the media, but because he's such a little bitch he resorts to that nonsense when his team gets outplayed.
this is false.

he gives short press conferences when he wins too. he's less chipper but he also refuses to answer questions when we win lots too.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DcifrThs
i think as much sense PDO makes, it may overdo it a bit too. an example, the zubris accidental deflection vs. lundqvist. what % of goalies do you think are quick enough to butterfly and stop that while having 2-3 people to watch/think about? i think henrik clearly has a ton of skill.

and what does PDO say about the kings? or about the canadians in the 50s, islanders in the early 80s, and the oilers?

clearly there are exceptions to PDO and i dont think teams "run hot" over hundreds of games and win cup after cup. skill explains more of that than luck does.

ETA: i have no argument against that they got lucky to get the #1 seed. ofc they did. but they were still a top 2-3 seed team regardless. i think they did get lucky this playoff series as well (richard's last second goal, some lucky crossbars etc.) but not any more lucky than any other team currently in this spot (ex-the kings maybe. but they didn't play the caps/senators who i think played way better than expectation esp compared w/ kings competition vs. how they were expected to play)
There are exceptions to PDO, and that is where you find truly elite players and teams. There are a handful of goalies in the elite tier who can have an above average save % year in, year out. Lundqvist is able to consistently be above average. So can Thomas AND Rask. Luongo and Schneider also form a formidable pair.

The vast majority of goalies are average though. One year they might post a SV% of 930, the next year, 900.

The other portion of PDO is S%. That is much harder to be elite at, when looking at a team level. Going off memory I think that only Vancouver has been able to have an above average S% each and every year for the past 4 years.

PDO likes the Kings a lot. Why? Because it was low during the season. Now whether due to coaching or luck (likely a combination of the two) the Kings had an absolutely woeful S% this season. They finished the year 4th in Fenwick. If the bounces had been fair hey likely would have finished 4th overall.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 01:10 PM
The good thing about the Rangers losing is that we will get to see Torts-Brooks IV - The Ruckus At The Rock
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 01:22 PM
i like how anything anyone can talk about now is tortorella instead of the rangers getting stomped in 4 out of the 6 periods of this series
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:00 PM
Triumph - not sure if you were aware but each 1 game is 3 periods and it doesn't matter how many goals per period you score, but how many total goals you score in the duration of those 3 periods total

I just get the impression you never played hockey and therefore missed out on your hockey school lessons when you were 4 years old

but ya that's how hockey is played
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:08 PM
wtf?

and here i thought hockey games were decided on the 10-point must system, with best 2 out of 3 periods takes the game?

(shots directed towards the net obv most impressive to the judges)
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:10 PM
When Bettman retires and Driving Play takes over as commish, all games will be scored by FENWICK. And there are still 3 point games if there's a tie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xander
He's a baby. He chats it up when they win and acts like a child when they lose. Part of his job is addressing the media, but because he's such a little bitch he resorts to that nonsense when his team gets outplayed.
It's called strategic coaching & leading. It's actually a very high form of trolling, mastered by elite level coaches, CEOs and politicians. If you want to get far in life, you need to learn how to troll properly.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteGoose
When Bettman retires and Driving Play takes over as commish, all games will be scored by FENWICK. And there are still 3 point games if there's a tie
also, the outcomes of games can be appealed and overturned on the basis that a team ran hot/cold
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:24 PM
good lord has everyone's trolling just gotten super lazy since the outage or what

anyway, the point i was trying to make is that the devils have largely been able to set up shop in the rangers' end. just like they did with the flyers. rangers fans should be concerned and the media should be talking about it more.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumph36
i like how anything anyone can talk about now is tortorella instead of the rangers getting stomped in 4 out of the 6 periods of this series
I guess it seems like Tortorella is doing his job then...oh wait, Torts sucks, he's a baby, he's a bitch etc. sorry.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShimmyBasis
Just like Jeremy LIN, HageLIN = fraud.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutshot2
I guess it seems like Tortorella is doing his job then...oh wait, Torts sucks, he's a baby, he's a bitch etc. sorry.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwicemvp12
Just like Jeremy LIN, HageLIN = fraud.
apparently the 'Harvard Sucks' troll has made it to the internets hockey threads.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:41 PM
Nah, I'd suck if I had to drag around Gaborik until his ass was benched.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:42 PM
Michigan >>>>>>> Harvard
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShimmyBasis
Michigan >>>>>>> Harvard
#cmonnowson
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutshot2
I guess it seems like Tortorella is doing his job then...oh wait, Torts sucks, he's a baby, he's a bitch etc. sorry.
doing his job? Why do people think this? The players aren't reading the papers or watching NBCSN, why does it matter what the media are saying about the games?
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:47 PM
Oh yeah, I forgot about the PDO thing too. As usual Khaos stepped in with some expert poasting.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumph36
good lord has everyone's trolling just gotten super lazy since the outage or what

anyway, the point i was trying to make is that the devils have largely been able to set up shop in the rangers' end. just like they did with the flyers. rangers fans should be concerned and the media should be talking about it more.
This exactly, when the Devs lost game 1, I wasn't terrible upset, because game 1 played just like the Flyers series. The Devils dominated and lost a very few battles and took the L. You could tell they would come out guns blazing in Game 2 and they did. They overpowered NY and played a much better game than the Rangs did in game 1.

Bold prediction: Devils go back to Ny up 3-1
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 02:48 PM
I forgot the players were blacked out from all media coverage. Thanks for reminding me! Are they allowed to take questions after practice or is that off limits too?
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Bold prediction: Devils go back to Ny up 3-1
I'd be pretty surprised if this doesn't go 7, even if the Devils continued to outplay 2 out of 3 periods, the Rangers D + Henrik will also keep them in games and allow them to win. Although Triumph might argue this should be a 4-2 series right now.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-17-2012 , 04:45 PM
gotta love that line: "why don't you get the **** outta here brooksy"

i had not heard that before.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote

      
m